Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) Meal Inclusion and Lactic Acid Bacteria Supplementation on the Performance of IPB D1 Chickens

  • R G Sakinah Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • W Hermana
  • Nahrowi
  • M Ridla IPB University
Keywords: antinutrient, chicken health, probiotic, soybean meal, substitute

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of including jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) meal in the ration and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supplementation on the performance and carcass yield of IPB D1 chickens. Jack bean meal (JBM) contains a high-energy, protein-rich feed ingredient that can substitute soybean meal, though it contains antinutrients such as hydrocyanic acid. Pre-treating jack beans through soaking and peeling reduces these antinutrients, allowing JBM to replace up to 20% of the diet. The inclusion of exogenous enzymes like protease can further enhance nutrient absorption and broiler health. The study involved 240 IPB D1 chickens, divided into four groups: control feed without LAB (J0L0), control feed with LAB (J0L1), treatment feed without LAB (J1L0), and treatment feed with LAB (J1L1). Feed intake, body weight gain (BWG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were measured weekly from weeks 3 to 9, and carcass yields were evaluated at the end of the study. Results showed significant variations (p<0.05) in weekly feed intake, BWG, and FCR across the treatments. Chickens fed JBM had lower (p<0.05) feed intake and BWG but these improved with LAB supplementation. FCR values improved significantly (p<0.05) with LAB supplementation in both control and treatment feeds. Carcass yield analysis indicated that LAB supplementation led to higher (p<0.05) final body weight and carcass yield, while JBM inclusion resulted in lower values (p<0.05). The study concludes that while JBM can negatively affect chicken performance due to antinutrients, LAB supplementation can mitigate these effects, enhancing both performance and carcass yield. In addition, probiotics are beneficial in poultry diets, counteracting antinutritional factors in feed ingredients like Jack bean meal.

Key words: antinutrient, chicken health, probiotic, soybean meal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alifianty OF, Ridla M, Nahrowi, Martin RSH & Akhadiarto S. 2023. Optimization of Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis L.) processing to reduce hydrogen cyanide content and enhance broiler chicken performance: a potential alternative to soybeans in poultry feed. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 35: #68. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd35/8/3568hmri.html

Arise AK, Malomo SA, Cynthia CI, Aliyu NA & Arise RO. 2022. Influence of processing methods on the antinutrients, morphology, and in-vitro protein digestibility of jack bean. Food Chemistry Advances. 1: 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2022.100078

Arsène MMJ, Davares AKL, Viktorovna PI, Andreevna SL, Sarra S, Khelifi I & Sergueïevna DM. 2022. The public health issue of antibiotic residues in food and feed: Causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Veterinary World. 15(3): 662–671. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.662-671

Farhadi D & Hosseini S. 2014. Comparison of broiler performance in two conventional and environmentally controlled modern broiler houses at tropics. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research. 2(3): 190-196. http://archives.gjasr.com/index.php/GJASR/article/view/46/164

Fikriandi S, Sumiati & Mutia R. 2024. Utilization of Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) meal as a substitute for soybean meal in diet of laying hens. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 36: #5. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd36/1/3605bedd.html

Habib MFA, Murtini S, Cyrilla L, Arief I, Mutia R. & Sumantri C. 2020. Performa pertumbuhan ayam ipb-d1 pada perlakuan pakan dan manajemen pemeliharaan yang berbeda. Jurnal Agripet. 20(2): 177-186. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v20i2.16375

Julendra H, Sofyan A, Istiqomah L, Karimy MF, Abinawanto & Yasman. 2021. Intestinal morphology, energy availability, and growth performance of broilers treated with the combination of probiotic and inulin. Tropical Animal Science Journal. 44(1): 39-48. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2021.44.1.39

Kaya Y, Erten T, Vurmaz M, İspirli H, Şimşek Ö, & Dertli E. 2022. Comparison of the probiotic characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) isolated from sourdough and infant feces. Food Bioscience. 47: 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101722

Khairati N, Ridla M, Hermana W & Nahrowi. 2024. Impact of diets incorporating Black Soldier Fly larvae meal and lactic acid bacteria-supplemented drinking water on the health profile and performance of IPB D1 chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 36: #35. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd36/4/3635hmri.html

Khwairakpam R, Singh RKJ, Singh RK, & Singh M. 2018. Weekly assessment of growth performance of broilers fed diet supplemented with garlic and turmeric powder and their combination. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(2): 1373-1381. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.166.

Mahardhika BP, Ridla M, Mutia R, Yuliana I, & Naja M. 2021. Utilization of Jack Bean Seed (Canavalia ensiformis) with Treatments of Protease Enzyme Fed to Broiler in Starter Period. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 31(3): 201–210. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2021.031.03.03

Mahardhika B, Ridla M, Mutia R, Febriani S, & Purbaya A. 2023. The evaluation of the use of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) and protease enzyme on the broiler diet with the different level of protein. Livestock and Animal Research. 21(2): 69-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/lar.v21i2.63459.

Mohammed MS & Ameen QA. 2023. Comparative study among local chickens with two strains for some performance traits. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 21(2): 330-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2023.181839.

Mutia R, Ridla M & Hermana W. 2024. Physical and nutritional properties of jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis L.) meal: A prospective alternative ingredient for poultry feed. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1359, 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1359/1/012101.

Nurhayu A, Ishak ABL, Sariubang M & Ella A. 2021. The production performance and meat quality of Kampung Unggul Balitbangtan (KUB) chicken fed with food containing Indigofera meal. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 828: 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/828/1/012008.

Palupi R, Lubis FNL, Pratama ANT & Muhakka. 2023. Effects of Lactobacillus-fermented feed on production performance and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Journal of World Poultry Research. 13(1): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2023.14

Rehman A, Arif M, Sajjad N, Al-Ghadi MQ, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Alhimaidi AR, Elnesr SS, Almutairi BO, Amran RA, Hussein EOS & Swelum AA. 2020. Dietary effect of probiotics and prebiotics on broiler performance, carcass, and immunity. Poultry Science. 99(12): 6946-6953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.043.

Sari RM & Akbar SA. 2019. The influence of lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus casei on the performance of broilers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 347: 012069. https://doi.org/1088/1755-1315/347/1/012069

Siddiqui SA, Toppi V & Syiffah L. 2024. A comparative review on Ayam Cemani chicken - A comparison with the most common chicken species in terms of nutritional values, LCA, price and consumer acceptance. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 56(4): 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-03980-6

Sinurat AP, Haryati T, Herliatika A, & Pratiwi N. 2022. Performances of KUB chickens fed diets with different nutrient densities and BS4 enzyme supplementation. Tropical Animal Science Journal. 45(1): 73-83. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2022.45.1.73

Sjofjan O, Adli DN, Harahap RP, Jayanegara A, Utama DT & Seruni AP. 2021. The effects of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts as probiotics on the growth performance, relative organ weight, blood parameters, and immune responses of broiler: A meta-analysis. F1000Research. 10: 183. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51219.3

Sudarman A, Jayanti A & Mutia R. 2018. Utilization of Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) meal as a substitute for soybean meal in idet for broiler reared for 35 days. Buletin Peternakan. 42(1): 8-14. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.24772

Sutedja AM, Ito A, Yanase E, Batubara I, Fardiaz D & Lioe HN. 2022. Influence of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis (L) DC) milk processing on bioactive compounds and its antioxidant activity. Food Science and Technology. 42: e11521. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.11521

Tavaniello S, Fatica A, Palazzo M, Zejnelhoxha S, Wu M, Marco LD, Salimei E & Maiorano G. 2022. Carcass and meat quality traits of medium-growing broiler chickens fed soybean or pea bean and raised under semi-intensive conditions. Animals. 12(20): 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202849

Yusuf D, Kholifaturrohmah R, Nurcholis M, Setiarto RHB, Anggadhania L & Sulistiani. 2023. Potential of white jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis L. DC) Kefir as a microencapsulated antioxidant. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science. 28(4): 453–462. https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.4.453

Published
2024-08-31
How to Cite
SakinahR. G., HermanaW., NahrowiN., & RidlaM. (2024). Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis) Meal Inclusion and Lactic Acid Bacteria Supplementation on the Performance of IPB D1 Chickens. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 22(2), 79-84. Retrieved from https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalintp/article/view/56409

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>