Daya Saing Dan Komplementaritas Perdagangan Kayu Indonesia: Kasus Kawasan Asia-Pasifik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesia trades ten groups of wood in the Asia-Pacific region. Many forest industry problems occur during trade. Competition and interdependence in trade are research objectives. The research secondary data source is taken from UN Comtrade 2011-2021 and analyzed using the Export Similarity Index (ESI), Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), Trade Complementarity Index (TCI), and Intra-Industry Trade (IIT) methods. The research results show that the wood export trade between Indonesia and competing countries competes weakly with each other in the six partner countries. Indonesia is competitive in the products SITC 245 (fuel wood (excluding wood waste) and wood charcoal), SITC 248 (wood, simply worked, and railway sleepers of wood), SITC 251 (pulp and waste paper), SITC 634 (veneers, plywood, particle board, and other wood, worked, n.e.s.), SITC 635 (wood manufactures, n.e.s.), and SITC 641 (paper and paperboard). On the other hand, Indonesia and partner countries almost complement each other as trading partners in terms of exports and imports of wood. However, the integration of Indonesian wood trade with partner countries is considered weak. Products SITC 248 (wood, simply worked, and railway sleepers of wood), SITC 251 (pulp and waste paper), SITC 641 (paper and paperboard), and SITC 642 (paper and paperboard, cut to size or shape, and articles of paper or paperboard) are several product industries that have led to intra-industry trade. Policy recommendations are to utilize resources optimally, develop the wood processing industry to produce finished wood products, and improve the quality and standards of wood products in accordance with policies in trade cooperation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author submitting the manuscript must understand and agree that the copyright of the article manuscript must be submitted/transferred to the Journal Forum Agribisnis. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) International License in which the Author and Reader can copy and redistribute the material in any media or format, and remix, modify and build material for any purpose, but they must provide appropriate credit (citing articles or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate whether there is a change. If you mix, change, or create material, you must distribute your contribution under the same license as the original.
References
Austria, Myrna S. 2004. The Pattern of Intra-ASEAN Trade in the Priority Goods Sectors. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/priority_goods_sector.pdf. Diakses 17 Juli 2022.
Bacchetta M, Beverelli C, Cadot O, Fugazza M, Grether J-M, Helbie M, Nicita A, & Piermartini R. 2012. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. Jenewa (CHE): World Trade Organization.
Balassa, B. 1965. Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2): 99-123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
Barusman, M. Y. S. 2013. Daya Saing dan Kebijakan Ekonomi Internasional Kayu Lapis Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 3(2): 135-149. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/jmb.v3i2.599.
Benyamin, Rahardjo, Bambang Supriambodo, Imam Santoso, Hadi Siswoyo, David, Bambang Widyantoro, Soewarso, Erwansyah, Endro Siswoko, Irsyal Yasman, et al. 2019. Road Map Pembangunan Hutan Produksi Tahun 2019-2045. Asosiasi Pengusaha Hutan Indonesia. https://www.rimbawan.com/files/2020/05/Road-Map-APHI-2019-2045-Mobile_compressed.pdf. Diakses 21 Juli 2022.
Buturac, G., Mikulić, D., & Palić, P. 2019. Sources of Export Growth and Development of Manufacturing Industry: Empirical Evidence from Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1): 101-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1550003
.
Choi, C. B., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Resource Complementarity and International Joint Venture Performance in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(2): 561-576. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-011-9258-4.
Coşar, A. K., & Fajgelbaum, P. D. 2016. Internal Geography, International Trade, and Regional Specialization. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8(1): 24-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140145.
Dwiprabowo, H. 2009. Analisis Daya Saing Ekspor Panel-Panel Kayu Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 2(6): 151-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2009.6.2.%25p.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. Asia-Pacific Forests and Forestry to 2020: Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study II. https://www.fao.org. Diakses 10 November 2022.
Ghazoul, J., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J., & King, L. A. 2015. Conceptualizing Forest Degradation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30(10): 622-632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.001.
Gordeev, R. 2020. Comparative Advantages of Russian Forest Products on the Global Market. Forest Policy and Economics, 119(2020): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102286.
Grubel, H., & Lloyd, P. J. 1979. The Empirical Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade*. The Economic Record, 47(4): 494-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1971.tb00772.x.
He, M., Huang, Z., & Zhang, N. 2016. An Empirical Research on Agricultural Trade between China and “The Belt and Road” Countries: Competitiveness and Complementarity. Modern Economy, 7(14): 1671-1686. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.714147.
Hermans-Neumann, K., Gerstner, K., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Herold, M., Seppelt, R., & Wunder, S. 2016. Why Do Forest Products Become Less Available? A Pan-Tropical Comparison of Drivers of Forest-Resource Degradation. Environmental Research Letters, 11(12): 1-14. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125010.
Hoang, V. 2018. Assessing the Agricultural Trade Complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Countries. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 64(10): 464-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/253/2017-AGRICECON.
Huchet-Bourdon, M., Mouël, C. Le., & Vijil, M. 2017. The Relationship between Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Some New Insights on the Openness Measurement Issue. World Economy, 41(1): 1-18. DOI:10.1111/twec.12586.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023a. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by Australia in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 10 Juli 2023.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023b. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by China in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 18 Juli 2023.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023c. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by Japan in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 17 Juli 2023.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023d. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by Korea, Republic of in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 17 Juli 2023.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023e. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by New Zealand in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 20 Juli 2023.
[ITC] International Trade Center. 2023f. List of Supplying Markets for the Product Imported by United States of America in 2022 Product: 44 Wood and Articles of Wood; Wood Charcoal. https://www.trademap.org. Diakses 08 Juli 2023.
Krugman, P. R. 1987. Is Free Trade Passé? Economic Perspectives, 1(2): 131-144. DOI: 10.1257/jep.1.2.131.
Krugman PR, Obstfeld M, & Melitz MJ. 2012. International Economics: Theory & Policy. Ed ke-9. Boston (USA): Pearson Education.
Lingzhi, Z. 2021. Analysis on Trade Competitiveness and Trade Complementarity between Uzbekistan and the Member States of Eurasian Economic Union. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 7(2): 7-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.72.2001.
Liu, C., Xu, J., & Zhang, H. 2020. Competitiveness or Complementarity? A Dynamic Network Analysis of International Agri-Trade along the Belt and Road. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 13(2): 349-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09307-5.
Los, B., Timmer, M. P., & Vries, G. J. de. 2015. How Global are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation. Journal of Regional Science, 55(1): 66-92. DOI: 10.1111/jors.12121.
Lowe, A. J., Dormontt, E. E., Bowie, M. J., Degen, B., Gardner, S., Thomas, D., Clarke, C., Rimbawanto, A., Wiedenhoeft, A., Yin, Y., et al. 2016. Opportunities for Improved Transparency in the Timber Trade through Scientific Verification. Bioscience, 66(11): 990-998. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw129.
Lubis, A. 2013. Daya Saing, Kinerja Perdagangan, dan Dampak Liberalisasi Produk Kehutanan. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 7(1): 37-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v7i1.99.
Michaely, Michael. 1996. Trade Preferential Agreements in Latin America. Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/934301468773398976/pdf/multi0page.pdf. Diakses 23 Oktober 2023.
Midgley, S. J., Stevens, P. R., & Arnold, R. J. 2017. Hidden Assets: Asia’s Smallholder Wood Resources and Their Contribution to Supply Chains of Commercial Wood. Australian Forestry, 80(1): 10-25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2017.1280750.
Mutaqin, D. J., Nurhayani, F. O., & Rahayu, N. H. 2022. Performa Industri Hutan Kayu dan Strategi Pemulihan Pascapandemi Covid-19. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(1): 48-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i1.111.
Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Nurfatriani, F., Indrajaya, Y., Yuwati, T. W., Ekawati, S., Salminah, M., Gunawan, H., Subarudi, S., Sallata, M. K., Allo, M. K., et al. 2022. Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services from Indonesia’s Remaining Forests. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19): 1-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912124.
Plummer MG, Cheong D, & Hamanaka S. 2010. Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements. Metro Manila (PHL): Asian Development Bank.
Rannikko, P., & Salmi, P. 2018. Towards Neo-Productivism? – Finnish Paths in the Use of Forest and Sea. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(3): 625-643. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12195.
Saltarelli, F., Cimini, V., Tacchella, A., Zaccaria, A., & Cristelli, M. 2020. Is Export a Probe for Domestic Production? Frontiers of Physics, 8(180): 1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00180.
Salvatore D. 2013. International Economics. Ed ke-11. New Jersey (USA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Saragih, W. A., Krisnamurthi, B., & Tinaprilla, N. 2017. Titik Kritis Produksi Minyak Sawit Berkelanjutan di PT. XYZ. Forum Agribisnis : Agribusiness Forum, 7(2): 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.7.2.191-211.
Sawyer, W. C., Sprinkle, R. L., & Tochkov, K. 2010. Patterns and Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 21(5): 485-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2010.04.001.
Song, L., Wang, H., Song, W., & Yang, C. 2022. Integration Level and Influencing Factors’ Analysis of Forest Product Market Based on the Mathematical Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022: 1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9650328.
Sopacua, R. I., Fariyanti, A., & Burhanuddin. 2020. Penentuan Prioritas Jenis Agroindustri Kelapa di Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. Forum Agribisnis : Agribusiness Forum, 10(1): 68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.10.1.68-78.
Sultanuzzaman, M. R., Fan, H., Mohamued, E. A., Hossain, M. I., & Islam, M. A. 2019. Effects of Export and Technology on Economic Growth: Selected Emerging Asian Economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1): 2515-2531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1650656.
Sunardi, D., Oktaviani, R., & Novianti, T. 2014. Analisis Daya Saing dan Faktor Penentu Ekspor Komoditas Unggulan Indonesia ke Organisasi Kerjasama Islam (OKI). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 3(2): 95-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.3.2.2014.95-110.
Suparmono, Suandana, E., & Ilmas, F. 2022. Determining Competitiveness of Indonesian Export Commodities Using Revealed Comparative Analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 23(1): 66-80. DOI: 10.18196/jesp.v23i1.13557.
Sylviani, & Hadi, S. 2000. Perkembangan Import Kayu dari Beberapa Industri di Indonesia. Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan, 18(3): 153-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20886/jphh.2000.18.3.153-162.
Tahir, M., & Azid, T. 2015. The Relationship between International Trade Openness and Economic Growth in the Developing Economies Some New Dimensions. Journal of Chinese Economic Foreign Trade Studies, 8(2): 123-139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-02-2015-0004.
[UN Comtrade] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2023. Trade Data. https://comtradeplus.un.org. Diakses 12 Agustus 2023.
Yamamoto, Y., Takeuchi, K., & Shinkuma, T. 2014. Is There a Price Premium for Certified Wood? Empirical Evidence from Log Auction Data in Japan. Forest Policy and Economics, 38(2014): 168-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.002.
Zahonogo, P. 2017. Trade and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Trade, 3(1/2): 41-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2017.02.001.