Desain Kelembagaan Usaha Hutan Rakyat untuk Mewujudkan Kelestarian Hutan dan Kelestarian Usaha dalam Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan Masyarakat Pedesaan

  • . Hardjanto
  • Yulius Hero
  • Soni Trison
Keywords: business sustainability, discourse, forest sustainability, institutional, people forest

Abstract

People forests in Java, have been around since 1950s, and it has been sustaining naturally following the market without any intervention. Nowadays, it keeps developing, with the increase in market demand and wood processing industry. People forest system consists of four sub-systems, those are: production, processing, marketing, and institutional sub-systems, which are simultaneously and dynamically interrelated in a system. The institutional sub-system requires collaborative arrangement that involves many parties. The objectives of the study were: 1) to identify knowledge, actors/networks, and interest/dynamic of people forest, 2) to analyze policy space of people forest management, and 3) to make a design of a people forest institution. The results showed that 1) The knowledge in people forest business came from families, neighbors, and government programs, 2) Actors of people forest agribusiness consisted of primary and secondary actors, 3) Cooperative relationship among actors of people forest business was mainly in the interest of gaining profit for each party,and 4) Institutional designs aimed at solving problems in policy space of people forest management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

. Hardjanto

Departemen Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680

Yulius Hero
Departemen Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680
Soni Trison
Departemen Manajemen Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680

References

Arts B, Buizer M. 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Journal Forest Policy and Economics. 11 (5-6): 340-347.

Fishcher F. 2003. Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as deliberative practice. In: M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, Editors, Deliberative Policy Analysis; Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hardjanto. 2003. Keragaan dan Pengembangan Usaha Kayu Rakyat Di Pulau Jawa. Disertasi. (Tidak dipublikasikan). Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hardjanto dan Trison S. 2010. Pengembangan Hutan Rakyat untuk Penyediaan Kayu Energi dalam Rangka Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hawitt S. 2009. Discourse analysis and public policy research. Centre for Rural Economy, New Castle University. Discussion Paper Series No. 24.

Howarth D. 2000. Discourse. Open University Press, Buckingham etcetera.

[IDS] Institute of Development Studies. 2006. Understanding Policy Processes: A Review of IDS research on the Environment. Knowledge, Technology and Society Team. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, Brighton.

Reckwitz A. 2002. Towards a theory of social practices. A Development in Culturist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory. 5 (2): 243-263.

Published
2014-08-23
How to Cite
Hardjanto., HeroY., & TrisonS. (2014). Desain Kelembagaan Usaha Hutan Rakyat untuk Mewujudkan Kelestarian Hutan dan Kelestarian Usaha dalam Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan Masyarakat Pedesaan. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 17(2), 103-107. Retrieved from https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/8323

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2