STRATEGI PENGHIDUPAN KELOMPOK KEMITRAAN KONSERVASI DI TAMAN NASIONAL GUNUNG CIREMAI
Abstract
The change in function of the forest environment has an impact on the condition of community livelihood assets and a variety of livelihood strategies for communities around the forest. The livelihood system is defined as a household's ability to meet its daily needs within a sufficient level of income. This research aims to formulate appropriate strategies for developing sustainable livelihoods of family/ household members of the Conservation Partnership Groups in Gunung Ciremai National Park (TNGC). This research used a quantitative approach including livelihood asset analysis, Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats (SWOT) analysis and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) analysis. The results of the research show that The Palutungan Arban group has the highest human capital, social capital and physical capital, namely score of human capital 3.45, social capital 3.76 and physical capital 3.70, while the Cipeuteuy Agung Lestari group has natural capital scores of 3.73 and financial capital 3.80. The priority strategy of conservation partnership groups in TNGC is diversification strategy.
Metrics
Downloads
References
[KLHK]. 2022. Status Hutan & Kehutanan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta
Ayyubi MS, Arifin HS, Kaswanto RL. 2024. Rekomendasi Strategi Pengelolaan Lanskap Publik Ruang Terbuka Hijau dan Biru di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2): 102-112. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.57137
Batiran KB, Fisher MR, Verheijen B, Sirimorok N, Sahide MAK. 2023. Uprooting The Mosalaki: Changing Institutions and Livelihood Impacts at Kelimutu National Park. Forest and Society 7(2): 295-310. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i2.26464.
Belcher B, Kusters K. 2004. Non-Timber Forest Product Commercialisation: Development and Conservation Lessons. Forest Products, Livelihoods and Conservation Case Studies of Non-Timber Forest Product Systems. Center for International Forestry Research.
Cahyono SA, Lastiantoro CY. 2019. Konflik Tenurial di Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. Merangkai Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi. PT. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
DFID. 2001. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development. London.
Ekawati S. 2019. Model-model Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi. Merangkai Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi. PT. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Ellis F. 2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Fatem SM, Runtuboi YY, Micah R, Fisher MR, Sufi Y, Maryudi A, Sirimorok N. 2023. Conservation Policy, Indigeneity, and Changing Traditional Hunting Practices in West Papua. Forest and Society 7(2): 359-379.
Fitriana AF, Kaswanto RL, Nurhayati HSA. 2023. Strategi Manajemen Lanskap yang Dikembangkan pada Taman Kota di Kota Purwokerto. SPACE 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/JRS.2023.v10.i02.p09.
Hakim N, Murtilaksono K, Omo RO. 2016. Konflik Penggunaan Lahan di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak Kabupaten Lebak. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan : 128-138.
Humaedi MA, Nadzir I, Himmi SK, Astutik S, Tessa A, Andari RV. 2024. Changing Livelihoods, Development, and Cultural Practices: Reshaping Forests Among the Tau Taa Vana People. Forest and Society 8(1): 61-80.
Kaswanto RL, Nakagoshi N. 2014. Landscape Ecology-based Approach for Assessing Pekarangan Condition to Preserve Protected Area in West Java. Designing Low Carbon Societies in Landscapes 289-311.
Kumesan F, Ngangi CR, Tarore MLG, Pangemanan PA. 2015. Strategi Bertahan Hidup (Life Survival Strategy) Buruh Tani di Desa Tombatu Dua Utara Kecamatan Tombatu Utara. E-Journal Unsrat Cocos 6(16) doi.org/10.35791/cocos.v6i16.9125.
Masnur B, Rusdiyanto E, Munawir A. 2024. Analisis Strategi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Lingkungan karena Peningkatan Lahan Terbangun di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2): 124-130. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.56508.
Nurjannah S, Amzu E, Sunkar A. 2017. Peran Kawasan Bernilai Konservasi Tinggi Bagi Pelestarian Keanekaragaman Hayati di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 3(1): 68-77
Nurysyifa F, Kaswanto RL. 2021. Kelembagaan Program Citarum Harum dalam Pengelolaan Sub DAS Cirasea, Citarum Hulu. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 8(3): 121-135. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i3.28064.
Paramita A, Sundawati L, Nurrochmat DR. 2017. Strategi Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu di Zona Tradisional Taman Nasional Ujung Kulon. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(1): 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v4i1.20075.
Prabowo SA, Basuni S, Suharjito D. 2010. Konflik Tanpa Henti: Permukiman dalam Kawasan Taman Nasional Halimun Salak. JMHT 16(3): 137–142.
Purnomo A, Aristin NF. 2016. Community Based Tourism Development for Sustainable Livelihoods in Lumajang-Malang Jawa Timur. Int Conf Soc Sci Humanity (ICSSH) :1825–1832.
Purnomo R, Nurrochmat DR. 2017. Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Lahan Melalui Skema PHBM di Desa Tugu Utara, Kecamatan Cisarua, Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 3(1): 52-67. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jkebijakan/article/view/15236.
Putri EIK, Dharmawan AH, Pramudita D. 2017. Analisis Kelembagaan dan Peran Stakeholder dalam Perubahan Struktur Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(2): 96-111.
Qanitha M. 2023. Strategi Sustainable Livelihood Masyarakat Pasca Implementasi Izin Kemitraan Konservasi di Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung. Tesis. Program Studi Ilmu Pengelolaan Hutan. Sekolah Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ramdhan M, Arifin HS, Suharnoto Y, Tarigan SD. 2018. Penilaian Indeks Kota Ramah Air untuk Kota Bogor untuk Penyusunan Strategi Kebijakan. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 5(1): 27-38. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.28757.
Saleh SE. 2014. Strategi Penghidupan Penduduk Sekitar Danau Limboto Provinsi Gorontalo. Disertasi. Program Studi Administrasi Perkantoran. Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.
Santosa A. 2019. Gap Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi, Apa yang Harus Diubah?. Merangkai Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi. PT. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Sardjo S, Dharmawan AH, Darusman D, Wahyuni ES. 2022. The Agricultural Expansion in Conservation Areas: The Case of Gunung Halimun Salak National Park, West Java. Forest and Society 6(2): 742-762.
Scoones, I. 2001. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods A Framework for Analysis. Institute of Development Studies.
Solihin A, Nababan BO. 2017. Analisis Kelembagaan Kemitraan Usaha Perikanan Tangkap Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Implementasinya di Kabupaten Rembang. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(2): 158-173.
Wahyuni N, Kamsin D, Febianti E, Bimantara GI. 2020. Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix Pemasaran Air Minum dalam Kemasan. Performa: Media Ilmiah Teknik Industri 19(1): 39-48.
Walukow MI, Pangemanan SA. 2015. Developing Competitive Strategic Model Using Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Approach for Handicrafts Ceramic Industry in Pulutan, Minahasa Regency. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 211: 688–695. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.11.104.
White BNF. 1991. Economic Diversification and Agrarian Change in Rural Java 1900-1990. In the Shadow of Agriculture: Non-Farm Activities in Javanese Economy, Past and Present. Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam.
Wibisono RA, Kartodihardjo H. 2017. Kelembagaan Hutan Rakyat Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani Taruna Tani Desa Karyasari Kecamatan Leuwiliang Bogor. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(3): 226-238.
Widiono S, Wahyuni ES, Kolopaking LM, Satria A. 2024. Livelihood Diversity of Rural Communities Without Legal Access to Forest Resources: The Case of Kerinci Seblat National Park in Bengkulu Province. Forest and Society 8(1): 249-270.
Wijayanti R, Baiquni M, Harini R. 2016. Strategi Penghidupan Berkelanjutan Masyarakat Berbasis Aset di Sub DAS Pusur, DAS Bengawan Solo. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan 4(2): 133-152.
Wiratno, Sya’bani B, Nisaa’ Z, Sumidi, Ariyanto AC, Anggoro MD. 2022. 100+ Inovasi KSDAE. Direktorat Jenderal Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem. Jakarta.
Zen, LZ, Darusman D, Santoso N. 2015. Strategi Mata Pencaharian Masyarakat Berkelanjutan pada Ekosistem Mangrove di Wonorejo, Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 2(3): 230-242.
Copyright (c) 2024 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
