KONTRIBUSI TANAMAN ENERGI HUTAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PENDAPATAN PETANI KTH MUKTI BERKAH DESA MEKARSARI, SERANG
Abstract
Energy crop management by utilizing community forests can be a solution in overcoming climate change issues and can provide a source of income for farmers' economy. This study aims to analyze the management of energy crops in community forests and determine the contribution to household income of farmers generated from energy crops by utilizing community forests. The sampling method used a purposive sampling technique with 60 respondents from KTH Mukti Berkah farmers in Mekarsari Village, Cinangka District, Serang Regency, Banten Province. The results of the study showed that energy crop management in community forests carried out by KTH Mukti Berkah farmers includes land preparation, planting, maintenance, and harvesting. Energy crops located on community forest land are types of gamal plants and wood waste. The contribution of energy crops in community forests is 2.14% to the average net income of farmers and the projection of planting energy crops in community forests and derivative products (leaves and compost) from gamal plants have a contribution of 27.09% to the average net income of KTH Mukti Berkah farmers. Energy crop management by utilizing community forests contributes to the source of income for KTH Mukti Berkah farmers in Mekarsari Village.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Amin M, Syahrir, Junaedi. 2023. Analisis Potensi Daun Gamal (Gliricidia sepium) sebagai Pakan Kambing pada Penanaman Intercropping Lada dan Gamal. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis 6(1): 9-14. DOI: 10.21776/ub.jnt.2023.006.01.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jnt.2023.006.01.2
Daini, Ratna, Mastura M. 2020. Pengaruh Modal dan Luas Lahan terhadap Pendapatan Petani Kopi di Desa Lewa Jadi, Kecamatan Bandar, Kabupaten Bener Meriah. Journal of Islamic Accounting Research 2(2): 136-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52490/j-iscan.v2i2.940
Dulatif, Sutarmin H, Oksatriana D, Fadli AM, Kristinawati, Amaliyah EF. 2022. Optimasi Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Sektor Kehutanan Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Indonesia Rich 3(2): 100-109.
Fadhilah MN, Hero Y. 2022. Pengaruh Perubahan Kebijakan Kehutanan terhadap Pengurusan Hutan Rakyat di Provinsi Jawa Barat dan CDK Wilayah VI Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(3): 177-187. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.34833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.34833
Fasya HN. 2019. Kontribusi Hutan Rakyat Terhadap Pendapatan Rumah Tangga dan Persepsi Petani Terhadap Keberlanjutan Hutan Rakyat di Desa Sadeng, Kabupaten Bogor. Skripsi. Departemen Manajemen Hutan. Fakultas Kehutanan dan Lingkungan. IPB University. Bogor.
Gutteridge RC, Shelton HM. 1998. Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture. CAB International. Wallinford.
Hamdani FAU, Darusman D, Tiryana TT. 2015. Evaluasi Praktik Tebang Butuh di Hutan Rakyat Kabupaten Ciamis Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 2(1): 33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v2i1.10387
Hamzah H, Suharjito D, Istomo I. 2016. Efektifitas Kelembagaan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan pada Masyarakat Nagari Simanau, Kabupaten Solok. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 2(2): 116-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v2i2.10979
Hardiansyah G, Erianto E, Pranoto D, Haryono Z, Mahdi I. 2023. Upaya Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Melalui Penanaman MPTS di Dusun Mianas Dalam Kawasan Hutan Dengan Tujuan Khusus (KHDTK) Untan. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 4(4): 9505–9512. DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v4i4.20449.
Ibisono RAA, Kartodihardjo H. 2019. Kelembagaan Hutan Rakyat Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani Taruna Tani Desa Karyasari Kecamatan Leuwiliang Bogor. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(3): 226-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v4i3.25999
Irundu, Fatmawati. 2019. Potensi Hutan Rakyat sebagai Penghasil Pangan di Desa Paku Kabupaten Polman Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Hutan dan Masyarakat 11(1): 41-48. DOI: 10.24259/jhm.v11i1.5669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24259/jhm.v11i1.5669
Junengsih J, Putri EIK, Ismail A. 2017. Analisis Stakeholder dalam Pengelolaan DAS Citarum dan Limbah Industri. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(2): 112-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v4i2.22030
Kaswanto RL, Muttaqin T. 2013. Revitalisasi Pekarangan sebagai Lanskap Agroforestri Skala Mikro Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Agroforestri. Balai Penelitian Teknologi Agroforestri.
Kaswanto RL, Rahmafitria F, Mosyaftiani A, Wiyoga H. 2024. The Effect of Environmental Knowledge and Perceived Value on Visitor Experience in Forest Recreation. Media Konservasi 29(3): 419-424. DOI: 10.29244/medkon.29.3.419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.29.3.419
Kuswandari R 2013. Kontribusi Hutan Rakyat Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di Dusun Jeruk Legi, Desa Katongan, Kecamatan Nglipar, Kabupaten Gunungkidul). Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Musdi M, Hardjanto H, Sundawati L. 2020. Kontribusi Hutan Rakyat Terhadap Pendapatan Petani di Kecamatan Kabawo Kabupaten Muna. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan 2(2): 1-8. DOI: 10.55285/bonita.v2i2.493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55285/bonita.v2i2.493
Nurysyifa F, Kaswanto RL. 2021. Kelembagaan Program Citarum Harum dalam Pengelolaan Sub DAS Cirasea, Citarum Hulu. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 8(3): 121-135. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i3.28064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i3.28064
Oktoyoki H, Suharjito D, Saharuddin S. 2017. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan di Kerinci oleh Kelembagaan Adat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 3(1): 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v3i1.15235
Pramudita A, Suryanaji S. 2021. Analisis Penetapan Harga Kayu Jati Plus Perhutani Berdasarkan Stumpage Cost dan Willingness to Pay. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 8(2): 53-59. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i2.28140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i2.28140
Rahmafitria F, Kaswanto RL. 2024. The Role of Eco-attraction in the Intention to Conduct Low-Carbon Actions: A Study of Visitor Behavior in Urban Forests. International Journal of Tourism Cities 10(3): 881-904. DOI: 10.1108/IJTC-07-2023-0138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-07-2023-0138
Sunardi, Kaswanto RL, Sjaf S. 2020. Relationship between Plant Biodiversity and Carbon Stock in Rural Area of Cisadane Watershed. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 18(3): 610-616. DOI: 10.14710/jil.18.3.610-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.18.3.610-616
Supriatna I, Ekayani M, Anggraini E. 2017. Implikasi Perubahan Hutan Rakyat Menjadi Kawasan Lindung Bagi Petani. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(1): 48-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v4i1.20062
Suwasono S, Jayus J, Rosyadi MG, Erawantini F. 2022. Produksi pakan ternak dari limbah tongkol Jagung Guna Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Curahnongko–Jember Jawa Timur. Jurnal Dinamika Pengabdian Masyarakat 7(3).409-414. DOI: 10.25047/jdinamika.v7i3 3538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25047/j-dinamika.v7i3.3538
Copyright (c) 2025 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
