The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Social Forestry Business Development in FMU South Bandung, Indonesia
Article Sidebar
11 July 2024
2 January 2025
Abstract
Social forestry symbolizes a sustainable forest management strategy, where local communities are important in strengthening socio-economic aspects, namely welfare and environmental sustainability. Increasing community welfare depends on collective efforts of social forestry, regional regulations, institutional structures, and cooperative with various stakeholders. Subsequent analysis employed the stakeholder analysis model, which scrutinizes stakeholders' roles in natural resource management. The examination compares roles outlined in policy with stakeholders' actual engagement. Consequently, the research provides insights into how stakeholders contribute to social forestry business development based on two critical factors: interest and influence. Results indicate that stakeholders' roles and contributions are substantially influenced by policy, especially concerning their interests and impact on community business ventures in social forestry. Stakeholder analysis reveals that governmental bodies, as mandated by policy, predominantly occupy quadrant II, tasked with aiding community groups in advancing social forestry businesses. However, quadrant I also encompasses governmental entities, albeit with limited involvement in community group activities. QuadrantsIII and IV underscore the diverse roles stakeholders assume within their respective domains, reflecting their interests and influence on business development initiatives to empower the community and improve the livelihood. This research aims to formulate tactics to enhance stakeholder involvement in implementing nation policies for fostering social forestry enterprises within the FMU South Bandung. The tactics need support of each party, especially the social forestry regulation in developing the business and capacity agency in measurement of accessible market, business plan, valuable product and good forest institutions.
References
Djaenudin, D.; Oktaviani, R.; Hartoyo, S.; Dwiprabowo, H. Analisis Peluang Keberhasilan Penurunan Laju Deforestasi: Pendekatan Teori Transisi Hutan. J. Penelit. Sos. dan Ekon. Kehutan. 2018, 15, 15–29, doi:10.20886/jpsek.2018.15.1.15-29.
Kastanya; Dr. Marthina Tjoa, S.Hut, MP; Dr. Ir. Gun Mardiatmoko, MP; Dr. Fransina Latumahina, S.Hut MP; Iskar Bone S.Hut, MSi; Hendrik E.S; Aponno, S.Hut, Ms. KAJIAN DAMPAK PERHUTANAN SOSIAL WILAYAH MALUKU - PAPUA; Program Studi Manajemen Hutan PPs UNPATTI, 2018; ISBN 9786026013705.
Republik Indonesia Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial. 2021, 1–268.
Herawati; N., L.; M.R., B.; E., M. Merancang Masa Depan Perhutanan Sosial Di Provinsi Lampung: Dari Skenario Menuju Aksi. Merancang Masa Depan Perhutan. Sos. di Provinsi Lampung Dari skenario menuju aksi 2017, 1–8, doi:10.17528/cifor/006558.
Puspitasari, S.A.; Saragih, H.J.R.; Navalino, R.D.A.N. Perhutanan Sosial Dalam Mendukung Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dari Perspektif Ekonomi Pertahanan (Studi Pada Desa Pantai Bakti Kecamatan Muara Gembong Kabupaten Bekasi). J. Ekon. Pertahanan 2019, 5, 121–142.
Supriyanto, H.; Sudarmo, S.; Setyowati, K. Implementation of Social Forestry in Perum Perhutani Kph Telawa. J. Anal. Kebijak. Kehutan. 2021, 18, 31–43, doi:10.20886/jakk.2021.18.1.31-43.
Affandi, O.; Kartodihardjo, H.; Nugroho, B.; Ekawati, S. Institutional Analysis of Forest Governance after the Implementation of Law Number 23/2014 in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. For. Soc. 2021, 5, 304–325, doi:10.24259/fs.v5i2.8755.
Soleha, N. Sustainability Strategies and Stakeholders’ Influence in The Palm Oil Industry. J. Appl. Business, Tax. Econ. Res. 2022, 1, 494–505, doi:10.54408/jabter.v1i5.94.
Alviya, I.; Yosefi Suryandari, E.; Maryani, R.; Muttaqin, Z. Meningkatkan Peran Pemangku Kepentingan Dalam Pengelolaan Wilayah Hulu Daerah Aliran Sungai Ciliwung. J. Penelit. Sos. dan Ekon. Kehutan. 2016, 13, 121–134, doi:10.20886/jpsek.2016.13.2.121-134.
Lawasi, M.A. Sebagai Formula Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial Constructing Access , Assistance , and Innovation As a Community Empowerment Policy Formula in the Social. JIANA J. Ilmu Adm. Negara, Vol. 20, Nomor 3 Desember 2022 50-65 e-ISSN 2714-55881 | p-ISSN 1411-948X 2022, 20, 51–65.
Yeny, I.; Agustarini, R.; Heryati, Y. Analisis Para Pihak Dalam Kerja Sama Pengembangan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu Di Kabupaten Pasaman Barat. J. Anal. Kebijak. Kehutan. 2018, 15, 143–164.
Yavuz, F.; Baycan, T. Stakeholder-Based Decision Making in Integrated Watershed Management Using Swot and Analytic Hierarchy Process Combination. Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 2014, 6, 2–34, doi:10.13033/ijahp.v6i1.194.
Mundir Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif; Hasanah, H., Ed.; 1st ed.; STAIN Jember Press: Jember, 2013; ISBN 978-85-232-0700-7.
Reed, M.S.; Graves, A.; Dandy, N.; Posthumus, H.; Hubacek, K.; Morris, J.; Prell, C.; Quinn, C.H.; Stringer, L.C. Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90, 1933–1949, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
Brumbaugh, D.R.; Cruz, S. Stakeholder Involvement in Co-Management of Marine Protected Areas ? A Stakeholder Analysis for The Bahamas. Rep. to Nat. Conserv. North. Caribb. Program, Nassau, Bahamas 2018, 26, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.26085.50406.
Gusliana; Hanifah, M.; Andrikasmi, S. Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial Berkelanjutan Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Ekologis Di Provinsi Riau PENDAHULUAN Hutan Merupakan Karunia Dari Tuhan Yang Maha Esa Yang Memberikan Banyak Manfaat Bagi Kehidupan Manusia Di Dunia . Sebaliknya Manusia Seharus. J. Ilmu Huk. Fak. Huk. Univ. Riau 2022, 11, 299–316.
Tajuddin, T. The Importance of “Business Management” in Social Forestry Development in Production Forest. Bul. Eboni 2020, 2, 7–16, doi:10.20886/buleboni.5701.
Mekuria, W.; Haileslassie, A.; Tengberg, A.; Zazu, C. Stakeholders Interest and Influence and Their Interactions in Managing Natural Resources in Lake Hawassa Catchment, Ethiopia. Ecosyst. People 2021, 17, 87–107, doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1894238.
Mugwagwa, J.; Edwards, D.; de Haan, S. Assessing the Implementation and Influence of Policies That Support Research and Innovation Systems for Health: The Cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania. Heal. Res. Policy Syst. 2015, 13, 1–7, doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2.
Bloomfield, G.; Meli, P.; Brancalion, P.H.S.; Terris, E.; Guariguata, M.R.; Garen, E. Strategic Insights for Capacity Development on Forest Landscape Restoration: Implications for Addressing Global Commitments. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2019, 12, doi:10.1177/1940082919887589.
Sabatier, P.A. Theories of the Policy Process; 2019; ISBN 9781000607482.
Curșeu, P.L.; Schruijer, S.G. Stakeholder Diversity and the Comprehensiveness of Sustainability Decisions: The Role of Collaboration and Conflict. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 28, 114–120, doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.007.
Fitria, W.; Suharjito, D.; Ekawati, S. PERAN KESATUAN PENGELOLAAN HUTAN (KPH) DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PERHUTANAN SOSIAL (Studi Di KPH Produksi Kerinci, Provinsi Jambi Dan KPH Lindung Sijunjung, Provinsi Sumatera Barat). J. Anal. Kebijak. Kehutan. 2021, 18, 145–160, doi:10.20886/jakk.2021.18.2.145-160.
Raum, S. A Framework for Integrating Systematic Stakeholder Analysis in Ecosystem Services Research: Stakeholder Mapping for Forest Ecosystem Services in the UK. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 170–184, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.001.
Galudra, G. Focusing on Facilitation: Issues and Challenges of Capacity Development in Indonesia’S Social Forestry Reforms. For. Soc. 2019, 3, 133–136, doi:10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995.
Dhruba Bijaya, G.C.; Cheng, S.; Xu, Z.; Bhandari, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, X. Community Forestry and Livelihood in Nepal: A Review. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2016, 26, 1–12.
Báliková, K.; Korená Hillayová, M.; Dúbravská, B.; Bartalský, B.; Halaj, D.; Dobšinská, Z. Understanding the Role of Innovation Systems in PES Development: A Survey of Stakeholder Perspectives. Trees, For. People 2024, 15, doi:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100498.
Teder, M.; Kaimre, P. The Participation of Stakeholders in the Policy Processes and Their Satisfaction with Results: A Case of Estonian Forestry Policy. For. Policy Econ. 2018, 89, 54–62, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.05.007.
Lawlor, K.; Madeira, E.M.; Blockhus, J.; Ganz, D.J. Community Participation and Benefits in REDD+: A Review of Initial Outcomes and Lessons. Forests 2013, 4, 296–318, doi:10.3390/f4020296.
Ludvig, A.; Tahvanainen, V.; Dickson, A.; Evard, C.; Kurttila, M.; Cosovic, M.; Chapman, E.; Wilding, M.; Weiss, G. The Practice of Entrepreneurship in the Non-Wood Forest Products Sector: Support for Innovation on Private Forest Land. For. Policy Econ. 2016, 66, 31–37, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.007.
Sténs, A.; Bjärstig, T.; Nordström, E.M.; Sandström, C.; Fries, C.; Johansson, J. In the Eye of the Stakeholder: The Challenges of Governing Social Forest Values. Ambio 2016, 45, 87–99, doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0745-6.
Zikargae, M.H.; Woldearegay, A.G.; Skjerdal, T. Assessing the Roles of Stakeholders in Community Projects on Environmental Security and Livelihood of Impoverished Rural Society: A Nongovernmental Organization Implementation Strategy in Focus. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10987, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10987.
Laura H. Berry Stockholm Environment Institute 1 Making Space: How Public Participation Shapes Environmental Decision-Making. SEI Discuss. Br. 2019, 1, 1–8.
Abazović, D.; Mujkić, A. Political Will: A Short Introduction Case Study -Bosnia and Herzegovina; 2015; ISBN 9789958884412.
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
