ENHANCHING MENTORSHIP FOR SMALL FOOD BUSINESS: ROLE OF INTERACTION FREQUENCY ON ENTREPRENEURIAL EFFORT AND COMMITMENT

Authors

  • Qamariyah Nurdin Study Program of Agro-Industrial Engineering, Graduate School, IPB University
  • Meika Syahbana Rusli Study Program of Agro-Industrial Engineering, Graduate School, IPB University
  • Indah Yuliasih Study Program of Agro-Industrial Engineering, Graduate School, IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2025.35.2.136

Abstract

Small food businesses often face challenges due to limited resources and capacity, making it difficult to maintain consistent effort and achieve long-term goals. Effective mentorship has emerged as a crucial solution. Small food businesses often face challenges due to limited resources and capacity, making it difficult to maintain consistent effort and achieve long-term goals. Effective mentorship has emerged as a crucial solution. This research examined the direct impact of interaction frequency on entrepreneurial effort and its influence on task completion and venture goal commitment within the context of small food businesses. The study also considers the moderating roles of mentor attitude, entrepreneurial experience, and business profile. Data were collected from 111 small food industry owners in Indonesia using the Experience Sampling Methodology through longitudinal diary studies. The findings demonstrate that frequent mentor-mentee interactions significantly enhance entrepreneurial effort, leading to improved task completion. However, effort did not have a significant direct effect on venture goal commitment. This might be attributed to factors such as perceived steady progress and the entrepreneur's belief in achieving the goals. Moderation analysis reveals that entrepreneurial experience and business profile significantly moderate the relationship between interaction frequency and effort, while mentor attitude does not. These findings highlight the importance of maximising interaction frequency with mentors to improve business performance. Mentorship programs should be tailored to the entrepreneur's experience level and the business's profile. Instead of a one-size-fits-all approach, mentorship formats and materials should be adjusted based on the business's developmental stage.

Keywords: mentor-mentee interaction frequency, entrepreneurial effort, small food businesses, mentorship

 

References

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2020. Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2020. Jakarta: BPS RI.
Ayoobzadeh M. 2019. The impact of frequency of contact on protégé mentoring outcomes: The moderating effects of protégé general self-efficacy and face-to-face interaction. Human Resource Development International. 22(4):385–404.
Baum JR, Locke EA. 2004. The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(4):587–598.
Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Maksimovic V. 2005. Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does size matter?. Journal of Finance. 60(1): 137–177.
Cardon MS, Wincent J, Singh J, Drnovsek M. 2009. The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review. 34(3):511–532.
Carter NM, Gartner WB, Reynolds PD. 2020. Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing. 11(3): 151–166.
Cassar G. 2014. Industry and startup experience on entrepreneur forecast performance in new firms. Journal of Business Venturing. 29(1):137–151.
Chiodi V, Montes‐Rojas G. 2022. Mentoring as a dose treatment: Frequency matters—Evidence from a French mentoring programme. LABOUR. 36:145–166.
de Janasz SC, Sullivan SE. 2004. Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 64(2): 263–283.
Depken D, Zeman C. 2018. Small business challenges and the triple bottom line, TBL: Needs assessment in a Midwest State, U.S.A. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 135: 44–50.
Eby LT de T, Allen TD, Hoffman BJ, Baranik LE, Sauer JB, Baldwin S, Morrison MA, Kinkade KM, Maher CP, Curtis S, Evans SC. 2013. An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin. 139(2):441–476.
Fisher CD, To ML. 2012. Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 33(7):865–877.
Foo MD, Uy MA, Baron RA. 2009. How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94(4):1086–1094.
Gielnik MM, Spitzmuller M, Schmitt A, Klemann DK, Frese M. 2015. “I put in effort, therefore I am passionate”: Investigating the path from effort to passion in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal. 58(4):1012–1031.
Glendoh SH. 2001. Pembinaan dan pengembangan usaha kecil. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 3(1):1-13.
Grossman JB, Rhodes JE. 2002. The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology. 30(2):199–219.
Hayward MLA, Forster WR, Sarasvathy SD, Fredrickson BL. 2010. Beyond hubris: How highly confident entrepreneurs rebound to venture again. Journal of Business Venturing. 25(6): 569–578.
Kar B, Sarangi S. 2020. Factors of small business mentoring and practices. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal. 47(2): 104–114.
Khan YK, Kasuma J, Ali A. 2022. The challenges of small and medium businesses in managing human capital towards SMEs performance – A qualitative study. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting. 15(1): 311–343.
Khursanaliyev B, Solidjonov D. 2024. Foresight, innovation strategies, and technological guideline for turning a small business into a corporation. Di dalam: E3S Web of Conferences 538, 02015. International Scientific-Practical Conference; EDP Sciences.
Laffineur C, Dubard Barbosa S, Fayolle A, Montmartin B. 2019. The unshackled entrepreneur: Occupational determinants of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of Business Venturing. 35:1–25.
Markman G, Gianiodis PT, Phan PH, Balkin DB. 2005. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Social Science Research Network. 20:241–263.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. 2018. Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
O’Sullivan K, Mulligan R, Kuster M, Smith R, Hannon C. 2017. A college focused mentoring programme for students in socio-economically disadvantaged schools: The impact of mentoring relationship and frequency on college-going confidence, application efficacy and aspirations. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. 19(2):113–141.
Osabohien R, Worgwu H, Abdulaziz M. 2024. Mentorship and innovation as drivers of entrepreneurship performance in Africa’s largest economy. Social Enterprise Journal. 20(1): 76-90.
Rizun N, Revina A, Meister VG. 2021. Analyzing content of tasks in business process management. Blending task execution and organization perspectives. Computers in Industry. 130:1-24.
Seo E, Patall EA, Henderson MD, Steingut RR. 2017. The effects of goal origin and implementation intentions on goal commitment, effort, and performance. The Journal of Experimental Education. 86(3):386–401.
Smith KG, Baum JR, Locke EA. 2001. A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal. 44(2):292–303.
Spencer R. 2007. “I just feel safe with him”: Emotional closeness in male youth mentoring relationships. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 8(3):185–198.
Steelman LA, Levy PE, Snell AF. 2004. The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(1): 165–184.
St-Jean E, Audet J. 2009. The role of mentoring in the learning development of the novice entrepreneur. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 8(1): 119–140.
Tambunan T. 2019. Development of micro, small, and medium enterprises and their constraints: A story from Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business. 34(3): 51–72.
Trevelyan R. 2011. Self‐regulation and effort in entrepreneurial tasks. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 17(1):39–63.
Uy MA, Foo M-D, Ilies R. 2015. Perceived progress variability and entrepreneurial effort intensity: The moderating role of venture goal commitment. Journal of Business Venturing. 30(3):375–389.
Wu A, Song D, Yang Y. 2019. Untangling the effects of entrepreneurial opportunity on the performance of peasant entrepreneurship: The moderating roles of entrepreneurial effort and regional poverty level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 32(1-2):112–133.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

ENHANCHING MENTORSHIP FOR SMALL FOOD BUSINESS: ROLE OF INTERACTION FREQUENCY ON ENTREPRENEURIAL EFFORT AND COMMITMENT. (2025). Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 35(2), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2025.35.2.136