Faktor-Faktor Pendorong Adopsi dan Potensi Ekonomi Biogas dari Limbah Ternak Sapi Perah di Hulu DAS Citarum

Febby Rizali Nur Rury; Akhmad Fauzi; Ahyar Ismail

doi:10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v18i1.56013

Authors

Febby Rizali Nur Rury
Akhmad Fauzi
Ahyar Ismail

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v18i1.56013

Keywords:

dairy waste, biogas, multinomial logistic regression, extended CBA

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Dairy farming also produces manure as a by-product that has the potential to pollute the environment. Biogas from dairy waste is one of the solution to prevent pollution. However, some of the dairy farmers in the upstream Citarum watershed did not manage their waste and dispose it into the waterways. This study aims to identify factors that influence farmers' decisions to manage, stop managing or not managing dairy waste, and to estimate the potential costs and benefits of biogas processing. This study was conducted in February to August 2017 at Tarumajaya, Kertasari Sub-District of Bandung Regency. The method used was Multinomial Logistic Regression and Extended Cost-Benefit Analysis. The study showed that determinant factors that influence farmers’ tendency to manage dairy waste were fostering to the farmers (0,023), age (0,035), social pressure from the surrounding community (0,045), and membership in farmer groups (0,051). The Net-Present Value of biogas processing reached 5.298.340.449 IDR, and Net-B/C Ratio of 1,60.

Keyword: dairy waste, biogas, multinomial logistic regression, extended CBA

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Boardman, A. E., Greenberd, D., Vining, A. & Weimer, D., 2009. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concept and Practice. 4th penyunt. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Boyle, K. J. et al., 1994. An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(1), pp. 64-83.
Carson, R. T. & Mitchell, R. C., 1993. The Value Of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness To Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimable Quality Water. Water Resources Research, 29(7), pp. 2445-2454.
Cuéllar, A. D. & Webber, M. E., 2008. Cow Power: The Energy and Emissions Benefits of Converting Manure to Biogas. Environmental Research Letter, pp. 1-8.
Engler, C. R., Jordan, E. R., McFarland, M. J. & Lacewell, R. D., 1999. Economics and environmental impact of biogas production as a manure management strategy. Texas, Texas A & M University, College Station, pp. 109-114.
Fauzi, A., 2014. Valuasi Ekonomi dan Penilaian Kerusakan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Bogor: IPB Press.
Harahap, F. M., Apandi & Ginting, S., 1978. Teknologi Gasbio. Bandung: Pusat Teknologi Pembangungan Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Haryati, T., 2006. Biogas: Limbah Peternakan yang Menjadi Sumber Energi Alternatif. WARTAZOA, Volume 16 No.3, pp. 160-169.
Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S., 2000. Applied Logistic Regression: 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Kanagawa: IGES, Japan..
Juanda, B., 2009. Ekonometrika: Pemodelan dan Pendugaan. Bogor: IPB Press.
Kementerian Pertanian RI, 2016. Statistik Pertanian 2016. Jakarta (ID): Pusdatin Kementan RI.
Lam, J. & Heedge, F. T., 2011. Domestic Biogas Compact Course: Technology and Mass-Dissemination Experiences from Asia. Oldenburg: Oldenburg University.
Parikesit, Takeouchi, K., Tsunekawa, A. & Abdoellah, O. S., 2005. Resource analysis of small-scale dairy production system in an Indonesian village - a case study. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Volume 105, pp. 541-554.
Sihombing, D., 2000. Teknik Pengolahan Limbah Kegiatan/Usaha Peternakan. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian Lingkungan Hidup Lembaga Penelitian Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Widodo, T. W. & Hendriadi, A., 2005. Development of Biogas Processing for Small Scale Farm in Indonesia.. Proceeding of International Seminar on Biogas Technology for Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development, pp. 1-7.
Widodo, T. W. & Takumoto, O., n.d. Suggestion on Utilization of Feces at Large Scale Cattle Farm and Improvment of Environment. pp. 1-11.
Wilkinson, K. G., 2011. Rewiew a comparison of the drivers influencing adoption of on-farm anaerobic digestion in Germany and Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy, Volume 32, pp. 1613-1622.