Pengembangan dan Validasi Metode Pengukuran Preferensi dan Pola Aktivitas Ruang Terbuka Sebelum dan Setelah Pandemi di Kampus ITB Ganesha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v17i2.61884Keywords:
activity patterns, campus open space, pandemic, preferences, questionnaireAbstract
Campus open spaces play an important role in supporting social interaction and creating an integrated campus environment. Their provision is adjusted to the function and needs of students for outdoor spaces. This study aims to develop a method used to measure student preferences and activity patterns in utilizing campus open spaces. This study focuses on the development and validation of methods for measuring student preferences and activity patterns in campus open spaces through the design of a questionnaire as a measurement instrument, in order to obtain results that can represent the overall pattern of campus open space utilization. The data used in the design and preparation of this questionnaire are the factors and indicators that form campus open spaces, which have been identified in previous studies. Data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires, to be analyzed using statistical tests in the next stage. Statistical tests were conducted to test the correlation between the function of open spaces, factors, and indicators of campus open spaces with the landscape elements that form them. Through this statistical test, elements that have a significant correlation in creating campus open spaces that are in accordance with student preferences can be identified. The results of this study include the methods used for data collection that can later be used in statistical tests, in order to gain further insight into the preferences and patterns of campus open space utilization by students.
Downloads
References
Abbasi A, Alalouch C, Bramley A. 2016. Open Space Quality in Deproved Urban Areas: User Perspektive and Use Pattern. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 216: 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.028
Agustin OD, Simangunsong N I, Kahim R. 2021. Penilaian Kualitas Estetika Visual Lanskap pada Koridor Jalan Raya Bandara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta, Tangerang, Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 13(2). https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v13i2.33324
Ayyubi MS, Arifin HS, Kaswanto RL. 2024. Rekomendasi Strategi Pengelolaan Lanskap Publik Ruang Terbuka Hijau dan Biru di Kota Bogor. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2):102-112. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.57137
Biddulph M. 1999. Bringing Vitality to A Campus Environment. Urban Design International 4(3-4): 153–166.
Do DT, Cheng Y, Shojai A, Chen Y. 2019. Public Park Behavior in Da Nang: An Investigation into How Open Space is Used. Higher Education Press 2095-2635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.05.006
Dwiyanti FG, Siregar IZ, Kaswanto RL, Raffiudin R, Priawandiputra W, Herdiyeni Y, Santoso N, Nurrochmat DR, Qayim I, Mardiana R, Putra H, Utami AD. 2024. Komitmen IPB sebagai Nature Positive Universities. Journal Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika 6(3): 953-958.
El-Darwish I. 2021. Enhancing Outdoor Campus Design by Utilizing Space Syntax Theory for Social Interaction Locations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.010
Esin N, Ozsoy A. 2003. Environmental Quality: Concepts, Contradictions, and Some Questions, Quality of Urban Life Policy Versus Practice. Edited by Nuran Zeren Gülersoy, Nur Esin, Ahsen Özsoy, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey 24-32
Febiola MF, Soelistyari HT, Alfian R. 2024. Analisis Tingkat Kenyamanan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik pada Taman Alun-Alun Merdeka Kota Malang. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 16(2). https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v16i2.50231
Firmansyah, Kusuma BN, Allo IPR, Khalid FAN, Ramadhanty BD. 2022. Comparative Literature Review of Student Preferences and Activity Patterns on the Use of Campus Open Space Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic At the ITB Ganesha Campus. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1318/1/012017
Foellmer J, Kistemann T, Anthonj C. 2021. Academic Greenspace and Well-Being Can Campus Landscape be Therapeutic? Evidence from A German University. Wellbeing, Space and Society Journal 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2020.100003
Hami A, Abdi B. 2019. Students Landscaping Preferences for Open Spaces for Their Campus Environment. Indoor and Built Environment 30 (1): 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X198872
Hanan H. 2013. Open Space As Meaningful Place for Student in ITB Campus. Procedia Sosial and Behaviour Sciences 85: 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.361
Hillier B. 1996. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. London: Space Syntax.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605
Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Payne SR, Fuller RA, Painter B, Gaston KJ. 2009. Green Space, Soundscape and Urban Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary, Empirical Study. Local Environment 14: 155-172.
Lau S, Gou Z, Liu Y. 2014. Healthy Campus by Open Space Design: Approaches and Guidelines. Frontiers of Architectural Research 3: 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006
Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E. 2008. How Many Species are There: Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology 36: 731-742.
Lu M, Fu J. 2019. Attention Restoration Space on A University Campus: Exploring Restorative Campus Design based on Environmental Preferences of Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142629
Matlooba F, Sulaiman A, Ali T, Shamsuddin S, Mardyya W. 2014. Sustaining Campuses through Physical Character the Role of Landscape. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 140: 282–290.
Nurrohimah I, Fatimah I S. 2022. Persepsi dan Preferensi Masyarakat terhadap Tingkat Kenyamanan Taman Merdeka Metro sebagai Ruang Interaksi Sosial di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 14 (01). doi: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v14i1.37680
Peker E, Ataöv A. 2019. Exploring the Ways in which Campus Open Space Design Influences Students Learning Experiences. Landscape Research.
Revilla MA, Saris WE, Krosnick JA. 2013. Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales. Sociological Methods and Research 43(1): 73-97.
Rodaway P. 1994. Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place. London: Routledge.
Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2016. Research Methods for Business a Skill Building Approach. John Wiley and Sons.
Smith T, Nelischer M, Perkins N. 1997. Quality of an Urban Community: a Framework for Understanding the Relationship between Quality and Physical Form. Landscape and Urban Planning 39(2-3): 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00055-8
Speake J, Edmondson S, Nawaz H. 2013. Everyday Encounters with Nature: Students Perceptions and Use of University Campus Green Spaces. Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 7(1): 21-31.
Wells M, Merriman T. 2002.The Outdoors and the Classroom. Parks and Recreation 37(3): 94-100.
Wratmann FM, Frick J, Kienast F, Hunziker M. 2021. Factors Influencing Visual Landscape Quality Perceived by the Public. Result From A National Survei. Landscape and Urban Planning 208: 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Firmansyah, Bintang Nidia Kusuma, Ira Prayuni Rante Allo, Endang Triningsih, Widiyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal. However, after the article is submitted and published in this journal, it is fully copyrighted by the Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia or JLI. If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author must obtain written permission from the copyright owner and give credit to the source in the article. Then, the writer or reader is allowed to copy, share, and redistribute articles/material in any form. But it must still include the appropriate source and credit because the article in this journal is licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
I. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
II. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
