EMISI ENERGI DAN KEBIJAKAN KENDARAAN LISTRIK: STUDI KOMPARASI ANTARA CHINA DAN INDONESIA

  • Muhammad Iqbal Al Qodri Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi, Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680
  • Widyastutik Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, IPB University Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680
Kata Kunci: Kendaraan listrik, Kebijakan kendaraan listrik, Kebijakan transportasi, Emisi, Studi komparasi

Abstrak

Negara China dan Indonesia termasuk negara dengan populasi besar dan penyumbang emisi karbon dioksida dunia. Salah satu langkah untuk mengurangi emisi melalui adopsi kebijakan kendaraan listrik. Tingkat penetrasi kendaraan listrik di China dan Indonesia dapat berbeda karena pendekatan kebijakan yang digunakan. Dalam penelitian ini, metode analisis yang digunakan adalah studi komparasi bilateral dengan tinjauan pustaka. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, negara China telah mengadopsi kebijakan kendaraan listrik sejak tahun 2001 yang disertai dengan program dan insentif berkelanjutan. Sedangkan, Indonesia baru berfokus pada kendaraan listrik, khususnya kendaraan bermotor listrik berbasis baterai sejak tahun 2019. Melalui pendekatan pasar (permintaan dan penawaran) serta pendekatan infrastruktur diperoleh kondisi kebijakan di China dan Indonesia yang berbeda, serta dapat digunakan sebagai tolak ukur pengambilan keputusan bagi pemerintah Indonesia. Implikasi kebijakan dari hasil analisis, yaitu peningkatan insentif moneter dan non moneter bagi produsen serta konsumen, peningkatan partisipasi pemerintah daerah, dan memperjelas langkah eksekusi peta jalan kendaraan listrik Indonesia.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.loading##

Unduh

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Referensi

Alqodri, M.I., Widyastutik. 2023. Low emission policies of G20 member countries and export performance of indonesian motor vehicles. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 12(1), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.12.1.2023.41-68.

Chen, Z., Fan, Z., Zhao, X. 2022. Toward supply side incentive: The impact of government schemes on a vehicle manufacturer's adoption of electric vehicles. International Transactions in Operational Research, 29(6), 3565-3591. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13133.

Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Banja, M., Olivier, J.G.J., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Vignati, E. 2021. GHG Emissions of All World Countries-2021 Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

[Gaikindo] Gabungan Industri Kendaraan Bermotor Indonesia. 2022. Mobil Listrik di RI Terjual 2.803 Unit, Wuling Air ev Paling Laris. https://www.gaikindo.or.id/mobil-listrik-di-ri-terjual-2-803-unit-wuling-air-ev-paling-laris/

He, J., Yin, W. 2021. Policy Analysis of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry Policy. Dalam Appolloni, A., Caracciolo, F., Ding, Z., Gogas, P., Huang, G., Nartea, G., Ngo, T., Striełkowski, W.Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (hlm. 3247-3252). Atlantis Press International B.V.

Huang, Y., Chen, Y. 2017. The Review of Technology Industry Policy about New Energy Vehicles in China since the New Century. Dalam Chan et al. Proceedings of the Advances in Materials, Machinery, Electrical Engineering (AMMEE 2017) (hlm. 616-623). Atlantis Press.

Hwang, S.K. 2015. Comparative study on electric vehicle policies between Korea and EU Countries. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 7(4), 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/927/1/012003.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2021. Share of low-carbon sources and coal in world electricity generation, 1971-2021.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2022a. Enhancing Indonesia’s Power System. https://www.iea.org/reports/enhancing-indonesias-power-system.

[IEA] International Energy Agency. 2022b. Global EV Outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2022.

Levay, P.Z., Drossinos, Y., Thiel, C. 2017. The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.054.

Li, W., Ruyin, L., Hong, C., Feiyu, C., Xiao, Z., Muyi, Y. 2019. Effect of policy incentives on the uptake of electric vehicles in China. Sustainability, 11(12), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123323.

Mock, P., Yang, Z. 2014. Driving Electrification: A Global Comparison Of Fiscal Incentive Policy For Electric Vehicles. Washington: International Council on Clean Transportation.

[NBS] National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2022. Statistical Bulletin of the National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China in 2022.

Nugroho, S.B., Zusman, E., Nakano, R., Takahashi, K., Koakutsu, K., Kaswanto, R.L., Arifin, N., Munandar, A., Arifin, H.S., Muchtar, M., Gomi, K. 2017a. The effect of prepaid electricity system on household energy consumption–the case of Bogor, Indonesia. Procedia Engineering, 198: 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.117.

Nugroho, S.B., Zusman, E., Nakano, R., Takahashi, K., Kaswanto, R.L., Arifin, H.S., Arifin, N., Munandar, A., Muchtar, M., Gomi, K., Fujita, T. 2017b. Exploring influential factors on transition process of vehicle ownership in developing asian city, a case study in Bogor City Indonesia. IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 674-679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317966.

Onofrei, M., Vatamanu, A.F., Cigu, E. 2022. The relationship between economic growth and CO2 Emissions in EU Countries: A cointegration analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.934885.

Palmer, K., Tate, J.E., Wadud, Z., Nellthorp, J. 2018. Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Applied Energy, 209, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.089.

Setiawan, I.C. 2019. Policy simulation of electricity-based vehicle utilization in Indonesia. Automotive Experiences, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.v2i1.2020.

Simbolon, A.M., Rusli, B., Candardewini. 2022. Kebijakan kendaraan listrik dalam perspektif pasar dan infrastruktur: studi reviu komparasi bilateral Korea Selatan dan Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 24(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.25104/jptd.v24i2.1943.

Spentzas, C.N. 1993. Towards an electric vehicle policy. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 14(23), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.1993.061828.

Risyani, I., Bahtiar, R. 2022. Estimasi nilai pajak emisi kendaraan angkutan kota di Kota Bogor. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 9(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.34830.

Wang, D., Li, Y. 2022. Measuring the policy effectiveness of China’s new-energy vehicle industry and its differential impact on supply and demand markets. Sustainability, 14(13), 8215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14138215.

Wang, G. Zhu, Q. 2022. Wuling Hongguang MINIEV: A New Breed of Chinese Automaker. Harvard Business School Publishing.

Xue, C., Huaguo, Z., Qunqi, W., Xueying, W., Xingbo, X. 2021. Impact of incentive policies and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle market share: A panel data analysis from the 20 countries. Sustainability, 13(5), 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052928.

Yao, X., Ma, S., Bai, Y., Ning J. 2022. When are new energy vehicle incentives effective? Empirical evidence from 88 pilot cities in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 165: 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.003.

Diterbitkan
2023-12-01
Bagian
Articles