SIGNIFIKANSI PENGEMBANGAN INDIKATOR PERTANIAN BERKELANJUTAN UNTUK MENGEVALUASI KINERJA PEMBANGUNAN PERTANIAN INDONESIA
Abstract
Pertanian berkelanjutan merupakan komponen penting dalam pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Pengukuran keberlanjutan pertanian mutlak dilakukan untuk lebih memahami kondisi saat ini, mengidentifikasi tren, menetapkan target, memantau kemajuan, dan membandingkan kinerja antar wilayah. Penelitian tentang keberlanjutan pertanian di Indonesia lebih banyak dilakukan pada level usaha tani atau lokal. Indonesia belum memiliki indikator pertanian berkelanjutan yang menjadi tolok ukur penilaian pertanian berkelanjutan pada level regional/provinsi/nasional. Hal ini disebabkan karena begitu kompleksnya penilaian yang perlu dilakukan untuk mendapatkan hasil yang baik untuk penilaian pada level regional dan nasional. Indikator yang dapat diukur mengenai kelestarian lingkungan pertanian, dengan tujuan meminimalkan dampak lingkungan dari pertanian, merupakan alat penting untuk membantu menggerakkan dunia menuju masa depan pangan yang berkelanjutan. Indikator memungkinkan pembuat kebijakan, petani, bisnis, dan masyarakat sipil untuk lebih memahami kondisi saat ini, mengidentifikasi trend, menetapkan target, memantau kemajuan, dan membandingkan kinerja antar wilayah dan negara.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Alexandratos, N. dan Bruinsma, J. 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12-03. Rome, FAO.
Beddington, J. 2010. Food security: contributions from science to a new and greener revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1537), 61-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0201
Bell, S., dan Morse, S. 2008. Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Earthscan.
Berardi, G., Green, R., Hammond, B. 2011. Stability, sustainability, and catastrophe: Applying resilience thinking to US agriculture. Human Ecology Review, 18(2).
Binder, C.R. dan Feola, G. 2013. Normative, systemic and procedural aspects: a review of indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. In Methods and Procedures for Building Sustainable Farming Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5003-6_4
Springer Netherlands, 33-46.
Conway, G.R. dan Barbier, E.B. 2013. After the green revolution: sustainable agriculture for development. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315066820
Conway, G.R. dan Pretty, J.N. 2013. Unwelcome harvest: agriculture and pollution. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315066844
Daly, H.E. 1990. Towards Some Operational Principals of Sustainable Development. Ecological Economics, 2(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R
Dantsis, T., Douma, C. 2010. A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol Indic 10(2):256–263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.007
Darnhofer, I., Fairweather, J., dan Moller, H. 2010. Assessing a farm's sustainability: insights from resilience thinking. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 8(3), 186-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0480
Dasgupta, S. dan Roy, I. 2011. Good agricultural Governance: A resource guide focused on smallholder crop production. FAO, Regional Office For Asia And The Pacific, Bangkok. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/ba0113e/ba0113e00.pdf
Deng, F., Liu, C. and Liang, X. 2017. Measurement of Regional Agricultural Sustainable Development System Based on Dissipative Structure Theory: A Case Study in Sichuan Province, China. Sustainability (9), 2047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112047
[DFID] Department for International Development-UK. Growth and poverty reduction: the role of agriculture. A DFID Policy Paper. London. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] https://www.odi.org/ events/2155-dfids-new-agricultural-policy-paper-growth-poverty-reduction-role-agriculture
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2013. Sustainability path way. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari: http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/en/
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2015. FAO and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4997e.pdf
Federico, G. 2005. Feeding the world: an economic history of agriculture, 1800-2000. Princeton University Press.
Figueira J, Greco S, dan Ehrgott M. (Eds.). 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (Vol. 78). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., dan Walker, B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment, 31(5), 437-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
Gerdessen, J.C. dan Pascucci, S. 2013. Data Envelopment Analysis of sustainability indicators of European agricultural systems at regional level Agricultural Systems 118 (2013)78–90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.004
[IAASTD] International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. 2009. Global report. Island Press, Washington, US. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari: http://www.une:org/dewa/agassessment/reports/IAASTD/EN/Agriculture%20at%20a%20Crossroads_Global%20Report%20(English).pdf
[IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
Jackson-Smith, D. 2010. Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., dan Leiserowitz, A.A. 2005. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment (Washington DC), 47(3), 8-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
Malett,a H.E. 2014. Land and farm production: Availability, use, and productivity of agricultural land in the world. Use, and Productivity of Agricultural Land in the World. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 September 4] Tersedia dari: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2484248 orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2484248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2484248
Munasinghe, M. 2009. Sustainable Development In Practice: Sustainomics Methodology and Applications. New York (USA): Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626777
Nambiar, K.K.M., Gupta, A.P., dan Qinglin, F., Lic, S. 2001. Biophysical, chemical and socio-economic indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability in the Chinese coastal zone. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87: 209–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00279-1
Nedea, P.S. 2012. The Evolving Concept of Sustainable Agriculture. Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, 18, 64-69.
Pope, J., Annandale, D. dan Morrison-Saunders, A. 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, 24(6), 595-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001
Poppe, K.J., Termeer, C.J.A.M. dan Slingerland, M. (Eds.). 2009. Transitions towards sustainable agriculture and food chains in peri-urban areas. Wageningen Academic Pub DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-688-5
Ray, D.K., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C., dan Foley, J.A. 2013. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLOS one, 8(6), e66428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
Sadok, W., Angevin, F., Bergez, J.É., Bockstaller, C., Colomb, B., Guichard, L., Doré, T. 2009. Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: Implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods – A review. In Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 753-767). The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_46
Schoolman, E.D., Guest, J.S., Bush, K.F., dan Bell, A.R. 2012. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability science, 7(1), 67-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z
Susarla, A. dan Nazareth, K. 2007. Sustainable development: An introduction. Internship Series, Volume 1. Centre for Environment Education. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 September 4] Tersedia dari: http://www.sayen.org/Volume-I.pdf
Sydorovych, O. dan Wossink, A. 2008. The meaning of agricultural sustainability: evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Agricultural Systems, 98(1), 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.001
Talukder, B. 2016. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Agricultural Sustainability Assessment. Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1838. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 September 4] Tersedia dari: http://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1838
Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Iosifidis, E., dan Kiosses, I. 2009. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energy Policy, 37(5), 1587-1600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.011
UN. 2012. Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20–22 June 2012. United Nations.
UNDP. 2012. International guidebook of environmental finance tools: A sectoral Approach, Protected areas, sustainable forest, sustainable agriculture, and pro-poor energy. Chapter 5: Sustainable Agriculture. UND: [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/environment-energy/environmental_finance/international-guidebook-of-environmental-finance-tools-.html
UNEP. 2002. Integrating environment and development: 1972–2002. Global Environment Outlook 3 (GEO-3): Past, Present and Future Perspectives. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Desember 4] Tersedia dari: http://web.unep.org/geo/assessments/global-assessments/global-environment-outlook-3
USAID. 2012. Building resilience to recurrent crisis: USAID policy and program guidance U.S. Agency for International Development. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 November 14] Tersedia dari: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pbaab061.pdf
Van Calker, K..J, Berentsen, B.M., Giesen, G.W.J., dan Huirne, R.B.M. 2008. Maximising sustainability of Dutch dairy farming systems for different stakeholders: A modelling approach. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 407-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.010
vanLoon, G.W., Patil, S.G., dan Hugar, L.B. 2005. Agricultural sustainability: strategies for assessment. SAGE Publications. New Delhi.
van Zeijl-Rozema, A. 2011. Regional sustainable development: Barriers in practice. [internet] [Diunduh 2017 Oktober 14] Tersedia dari: www.icis.unimaas.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Thesis-Van-Zeijl.pdf
WCED. 1987. Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
WDR. 2008. Agriculture for Development. World Development Report. The World Bank. Washington, DC. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf
[WEF] World Economic Forum. 2013. Special report: Building national resilience to global risks. [Diunduh 2017 Oktober 14] Tersedia dari http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2013.pdf
Welch, R.M. dan Graham, R.D. 2000. A new paradigm for world agriculture: productive, sustainable, nutritious, healthful food systems. Food & Nutrition Bulletin, 21(4), 361-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100404
[WIT] World Information Transfer. 2008. Famine: Natural or manmade, Special focus. World Ecological Report. World information transfer. [internet] [Diunduh 2018 Januari 4] Tersedia dari: http://worldinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/library/wer/english/2008_Winter_Vol_XX_no_4.pdf
[WWAP] World Water Assessment Programme. 2012. The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk. Paris. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002171/217175e.pdf
Zhen, L., Routray, J.K., Zoebisch, M.A., Chen, G., Xie, G. dan Cheng, S. 2005. Three dimensions of sustainability of farming practices in the North China Plain: a case study from Ningjin county of Shandong province, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105(3): 507–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.07.012
Zhen, L, Zoebisch, M.A., Chen, G., Feng, Z. 2006. Sustainability of farmers’ soil fertility management practices: a case study in the North China Plain. J Environ Manage 79(4):409–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.009
Copyright (c) 2022 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
