DEREGULASI KEBIJAKAN LARANGAN EKSPOR KAYU BULAT DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v13i1.71850Kata Kunci:
Aktor, Deregulasi, Diskursus, Kayu Bulat, Kebijakan, KepentinganAbstrak
Perumusan kebijakan bukan sekedar isu teknis dan informasi yang akurat dengan sasaran yang jelas, melainkan juga melibatkan pertentangan aktor-aktor yang terlibat di dalamnya. Penelitian bertujuan memahami proses usulan deregulasi kebijakan larangan ekspor kayu bulat, dengan: (1) menganalisis aktor dan jaringannya yang terlibat perdebatan pemikiran; (2) menganalisis diskursus yang digunakan oleh masing-masing aktor; dan (3) menganalisis kepentingan/politik setiap aktor. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menetapkan objek penelitian secara purposive. Data dan informasi yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan analisis isi dan analisis proses kebijakan pada tiga faktor utama yaitu diskursus/narasi, aktor/jaringan, dan politik/kepentingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa usulan deregulasi kebijakan larangan ekspor kayu bulat oleh Kementerian Kehutanan sampai dengan tahun 2026 ini belum berhasil diterima karena beberapa faktor, yaitu: (a) narasi yang diusung pihak kontra dalam berbagai forum diskusi belum berhasil mengubah keyakinan pihak yang pro kebijakan larangan ekspor kayu bulat; (b) aktor yang pro kebijakan larangan ekspor kayu bulat memiliki dukungan yang kuat dalam koalisi, meliputi pemerintah pusat (Kementerian Perindustrian, Kementerian Perdagangan), pengusaha pada sebagian besar asosiasi kayu hilir/lanjutan, akademisi, peneliti, LSM lingkungan; dan (c) pihak pro kebijakan larangan ekspor kayu bulat memiliki jaringan kuat yaitu pelaku usaha-asosiasi-kementerian terkait.
Unduhan
Referensi
Andriyanty R, Widyastutik. 2025. Kebijakan Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG): Bagaimana Pengaruhnya terhadap Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 12(2): 182-190. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i2.66225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i2.66225
Barbier EB, Rauscher M. 1998. Trade, tropical deforestation and policy interventions. Environ Resource Econ 4: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691933
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Statistik Indonesia 2018. Jakarta.
Bondansari, Widiatmaka, Machfud, Munibah K, Ambarwulan W. 2024. Kebijakan Menuju Kemandirian Beras di Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(1): 33-45. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i1.53470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i1.53470
Budiardjo M. 2015. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Creswell JW. 2016. Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitiatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran Terjemahan dari: Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4thed.). Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta
Deacon RT. 1995. Assessing The Relationship Between Government Policy and Deforestation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240114-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1001
Dean JM. 1995. Export Bans, Environment, and Developing Country Welfare. Review of International Economics 3(3): 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1995.tb00074.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1995.tb00074.x
Dean JM, Gangopadhyay S. 1997. Export Bans, Environmental Protection, and Unemployment. Review of Development Economics 1(3): 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00022
[Dit.PHPL] Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari, 2019. Statistika Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari, Kementerian Kehutanan. Jakarta.
Ekonomi.bisnis.com. 2018. KLHK: Kemendag sudah sejalan soal ekspor log. Diakses pada [7 Maret 2018], dari https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20180307/99/747332/klhk-kemendag-sudah-sejalan-soal-ekspor-log.
Fitzgerald B. 1986. An Analysis of Indonesian Trade Policies: Countertrade, Downstream Processing, Import Restrictions, and the Deletion Program [CPD discussion paper no.1986-22]. World Bank. Washington DC.
[FWI] Forest Watch Indonesia. 2003. Dampak Kebijakan Larangan Ekspor Kayu Bulat: Pada Periode 1985-1997 terhadap Sektor Kehutanan Indonesia. INTIP HUTAN. FWI. Bogor.
Hajer MA. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press. New York.
Industri.bisnis.com. 2017. Pemerintah Pertimbangkan Buka Keran Ekspor Kayu Log. Diakses pada [21 November 2017], dari http://industri.bisnis.com/read/20171121/99/711419/pemerintah-pertimbangkan-buka-keran-ekspor-kayu-log.
Industri.kontan.co.id. 2017. Pengusaha Kritik KLHK Soal Kran Ekspor Kayu Bulat. Diakses pada [21 November 2017], dari http://industri.kontan.co.id/news/pengusaha-kritik-klhk-soal-kran-ekspor-kayu-bulat.
Kalimantan.binsis.com. 2017. Kayu bulat: larangan ekspor berpotensi dicabut. Diakses pada [22 November 2017], dari http://kalimantan.bisnis.com/read/20171122/452/711380/kayu-bulat-larangan-ekspor-berpotensi-dicabut.
Kartodihardjo H. 2008. Diskursus dan Aktor dalam Pembuatan dan Implementasi Kebijakan Kehutanan: Masalah Kerangka Pendekatan Rasional (Discourses and Actors in the Forest Policy Formulation: Problems of Rational Framework). Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika XIV(1): 19–27. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jmht/article/view/2906/1888.
Kartodihardjo H. 2013. Masalah dan Kebijakan Pengusahaan Hutan Alam Produksi (Paper dipersiapkan untuk Direktorat Jenderal Bina Usaha Kehutanan Kementerian Kehutanan). APHI. Jakarta.
Kartodihardjo H. 2017. Analisis Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumber daya Alam: Diskursus-Politik-Aktor-Jaringan. Sajogyo Institute. Bogor.
Khan A, Kartodihardjo H, Soedomo S, Darusman D. 2010. Forestry Utilization Policy: A Discourse Analysis. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika XVI(2): 101–111. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jmht/article/view/2001.
Kishor N, Mani M, Constantino L. 2001. Economic and Environmental Benefits of Eliminating Log Export Bans The Case of Costa Rica. Working Paper WP/01/153). International Monetary Fund. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0378-5920.2004.00616.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451857153.001
[KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2019. Statistik Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2019. Pusdatin. Jakarta.
Manurung EGT. 1995. Economic Impacts of the Log Export Ban Policy on the Development of Forest Products Industries of Indonesia. Disertasi. University of Wisconsin. Wisconsin.
Manurung T, Buongiorno J. 1997. Effects of The Ban on Tropical Log Exports of Indonesia. Journal of World Forest Resources Management 8: 21–49.
Nurrochmat DR. 2017. Strategi Kebijakan Pembangunan Kehutanan dan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan (Naskah Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar IPB). IPB University. Bogor.
Nurrochmat DR, Darusman D, Ekayani M. 2016. Kebijakan Pembangunan Kehutanan dan Lingkungan. IPB Press. Bogor.
Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press. New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739
Parnala M, Siregar H, Hartoyo S. 2004. Dampak Kebijakan Larangan Ekspor Log terhadap Illegal Logging. Tesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Baker J. 1997. Trade Barriers in the Pacific Forest Sector: Who Wins and Who Loses. Contemporary Economic Policy 15(1): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00457.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00457.x
Resosudarmo BP, Yusuf AA. 2006. Is The Log Export Ban An Efficient Instrument for Economic Development and Environmental Protection? The Case of Indonesia. Asian Economic Papers 5(2): 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep.2006.5.2.75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep.2006.5.2.75
Sabatier PA. 2019. Theories of Policy Process (2nded.). Routledge. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689
Scoones A, Leach M, Mehta L, Waldman L. 2006. Understanding Policy Processes: A Review of IDS Research on The Environment. Institute of Development Studies. United Kingdom.
Sembiring BSM, Widyastutik. 2023. Simulasi Kebijakan Produksi dan Perdagangan Indonesia Terhadap Industri Gula Domestik. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10(2): 62-74. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i2.48375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i2.48375
Sidabutar HP. 1988. An Investigation of the Impacts of Domestic Log Processing and Log Export Restrictions on Indonesia’s Export Earning from Logs. Tesis. University of Washington. Seattle.
Sutton R. 1999. The Policy Process: An Overview. Chameleon Press Ltd. London.
Titsher S, Mayer M, Wodak R, Vetter E. 2009. Metode Analisis Teks dan Wacana (Terjemahan Ibrahim, 1sted.). Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Drajad Kurniadi, Hariadi Kartodihardjo, Bramasto Nugroho, Rufi’ie
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Cara Mengutip
