Pesantren’s Social Innovation in Driving Agriculture and Social Change in Village
Abstract
Pesantren are educational institutions that have strong social ties in local communities and some of them implement entrepreneurial activities in the agricultural sector. Therefore Pesantren have a big capacity as an agricultural movers and produce social innovation with the rural community. In the process of social change in the village, pesantren have the capacity in producing agents of change that encourage social innovation in the agricultural sector. This study aims to analyze the capacity of pesantren as an agricultural movers and create a new agricultural innovators in the process of social change in the village. The results of this study indicate that in the process of social change in the village, pesantren can accelerate social change in the village through the activities of social innovation in agriculture. In addition, the process of education activity by pesantren is able to create an graduate who are also new innovators in the community. In conclusion, pesantren are able to become agricultural movers and creator rural agents of change.
References
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2012. Kecamatan Rancabali dalam Angka. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Kecamatan Rancabali dalam Angka. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik [PENDIS KEMENAG]
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama. 2008. Statistik Data Pendidikan Islam Analisis 2008 [internet].[diakses 21 Januari 2019]. Tersedian pada http://www.pendis.kemenag.go.id.
Alderson, Keanon J. 2011. “The role of moral and spiritual capital in a social entrepreneur’s personal development: a brief review of the literature”. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 1(1), 21. doi:10.1504/ijsei.2011.039809
Amaliah, Ima., Tasya Aspirianti , Pupung Purnamasari. 2015. “The Impact of The Value of Islamic Job Satisfaction in Tasikmalaya West Java, Indonesia, Industrial Centre.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol 211:984-991;doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.131
Bagir, Zainal A. 2015. “The “Relation” Between Science and Religion in The Pluralistic Landscape of Today’s World”. By the Joint Publication Based of Zygon, Volume 50, no.2:403-417.
Breman, Jan. 2014. Keuntungan Kolonial dari Kerja Paksa: Sostem Priangandari Tanam Paksa Kopi di Jawa 1720-1870. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
Brown, Michelle and Beate Baltes. 2017. “The Relationship Between Social Change Involvement and Education”. Journal of Social Change. Vol. 9 Issue 1: 131-140; doi: 10.5590/JOSC.2017.09.1.13
Byerly, Robin T. 2013. “Business in Society: The Social Contract Revisted.” Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change. Vol. 10. No. 1, April, 4-20. Doi: 10.1179/1477963312Z.0000000002
Claudet, Joseph G. 2016. “Deconstructing the Breakthrough Leadership Thinking of Visionary Social Change Agents: Insights and Strategies for Leading Transformative Change from Four Case Studies.” Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 271-318. Doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2016.69023
Cels, Sanderijn., Jorrit De Jong, Frans Nauta. 2012. Agents of Change: Strategy and Tactics for Social Innovation. Washington DC (US): Brookings Institution Press
Cerf, M., MN Guillot., & P Olry. 2011. “Acting as a Change Agent in Supporting Sustainable Agriculture: How to Cope with New Professional Situations?” The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 7–19.doi:10 .1080/1389224x.2011.536340
Corte,Valentina D., Giovanna D Gaudio, Fabiana Sepe, & Giuseppina Zampaelli. 2017. “The Role and Implications of Values-based Leadership”. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change. Page 1-27; doi:19.1080/14779633.2017.1378453
Creswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain riset: Memilih diantara lima pendekatan. Lazuardi, penerjemah. Qudsy SZ, editor. Yogyakarta(ID): Pustaka Belajar. Terjemahan dari: Qualitative Inquiry & Research Designe: Choosing Among Five Appoaches, Third Edition
Denzin, Norman K and Yvonna Sessions Lincoln. 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Dariyanto, Fata BS, Abi, Rinaldi J, penerjemah; Qudsy SZ, editor. Yogyakarta(ID): Pustaka Belajar. Terjemahan dari: Handbook of Qualitative Research
Devine, Joe., Graham K. Brown, G. K., and Severine Deneulin. 2015. “Contesting the Boundaries of Religion in Social Mobilization”. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(1), 22–47. doi:10.1177/0973174115569035
Fatimatuzzahroh, Feti., Oekan S Abdoellah OS, Sunardi. 2015. “The Potential of Pesantren in Sustainable Rural Development”. International Multidisciplinary Journal. [INTERNET]. waktu unduh [2017 Januari 6]; Vol.3, No 2. 257-278. dapat di unduh di: http://www.researchgate.net/
Fitrianto, Achmad R. 2014. “Developing Entrepreneurial
Curriculum in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education: A Transformation Process.” Creative Education. 5-2090-2096, doi:10.4236/ce.2014.524232
Ganzin, Max., Gazi Islam and Roy Suddaby. 2019. “Spirituality and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Magical Thinking in Future-Oriented Sensemaking”. Organization Studies, 017084061881903. doi:10.1177/0170840618819035
Grice, Julie C., Anna Davies , Robert Patrick & Will Norman. 2012. Defining Social Innovation. Brussels(BE): European Commission – 7th Framework Programme
Hagen, Everett E. 1962. On the Theory of Social Change. Illinois (US): The Dorsey Press.
Handayani, Sri A. 2017. “Geliat Ekonomi Masyarakat Priangan Era Pemerintahan Hindia Belanda 1900-1942”. Lembaran Sejarah. Vol 13 no. 2. 221-234
Idris, Aida and Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati. 2013. “Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: Lessons from the Past.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. Vol. 4, No.3: 277-301; doi: 10/1080/19420676.2013.820779
Kassim S, Permata W. 2016. “Issues and Challanges if Financing the Poo: Case of Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil in Indonesia.” International Journal of Bank Marketing. Vol 34 Iss 2; doi: 10.1108/IJBM-01-2015-0007
Koch, Sarah F., Mattias Nordqvist, Sara Carter, and Erik Hunter. 2017. “Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 129– 166.doi:10.1177/1042258717732958
Kersten, Carool. 2009. “Indonesia’s New Muslim Intellectuals.” Religion Compass, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 3/6: 971–985, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00187.x
Kwon, Seok W., Colleen Heflin, and Martin Ruef. 2013. “Community Social Capital and Entrepreneurship.” American Sociological Review, 78(6), 980– 1008.doi:10.1177/0003122413506440
Krlev, Gorgi., Eva Bund, and Georg Mildenberger. 2014. “Measuring What Matters- Indicators of Social Innovativeness on National Level.” Published with License by Taylor & Francis. Information Suystems Managemenrt, 31: 200-224. doi:10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
Light, Ivan and Leo Paul Dana. 2013. “Boundaries of Social Capital in Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 603–624. doi:10.1111/etap.12016
Malim. 2014. “Revisiting Islamic Education: the case of Indonesisa,”. Journal for Multicultural Education,Vol. 8 Iss 4 pp; doi: 10.1108/JME-5-2014-0019
Mardyanto, Eko. 2015. “Manajemen Kewirausahaan Pondok
Pesantren Berbasis Agrobisnis (Studi Kasus di PP Mukmin Mandiri dan PP Nurul Karomah)”. Jurnal Fikroh. Vol. 9 No. 2 Januari 2016 pp. 109-218
May, Vanessa. 2011. “Self, Belonging and Social Change”. Sociology Journal, 45(3), 363- 378 doi:10.1177/0038038511399624
Muray, Robin., Julie Caulier Grice, Geoff Mulgan. 2010. The Open Book Of Social Innovation. London(GB):The Young Foundation.
Moor, Lori L., Dustin K Grabsch and Craig Rotter. 2010. “Using Achievement Motivation Theory to Explain Student Participation in Residential Leadership Learning Community”. Journal of Leadership Education. Volume 9, Issue-2: 22-34. Doi: 10.12806/V9/I2/RF2
Nawawi. 2006. “Sejarah dan Perkembangan Pesantren”. Jurnal Studi Islam dan Budaya IBDA. Vol. 4 No. 1 Jan-Jun 2006: 4-19
Neumeier, Stefan. 2016. “Social Innovation in Rural Development: Identyfing the key factors of success”. The Geographical Journal 2016. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12180
Ney, Steven., Markus Beckmann, Dorit Graebnitz, & Ava Mirkovic. 2017. “Social Entrepreneurs and Social Change: Tracing Impact of Social Entrepreneurship through idesas, structures and practices”. International Journal Entrepreneurial Venturing Vol. 6, No.1: 51-68’ doi: 10.1504/IJEV.2014.059405
Ong, James A. 2016. “Organic social change”. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 59–81. doi:10.1080/1600910x.2016.1256336
Ritchey, Jeff and Nurhaya Muchtar. 2014. Indonesian Pesantren and Community Social Change: Moderate Islam’s Use of Media and Technology for Nonformal , Community Based Education. Kansas(US): Kansas State University Libraries: New Prairie Press.
Sujimin, Lala M Kolopaking, Sofyan Sjaf. 2019. “Strategi Aksi Inovasi Pertanian Berbasis Pengembangan Masyarakat.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. Vol. 7 No. 1. 47-56. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v7i1.24441
Seo, Y Seok. 2014. “What Lies between the religious and The Secular: Education beyond the Human”. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Vol. 48, No.1: 86-89; doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12053
Sirry, Mun’im. 2010. “The Public Expression of Traditional Islam: The Pesantren and Civil Society in Post-Suharto Indonesia”. Published by Blacwell Publishing [Internet]. 19 Desember 2016. 60-73. Dapat di unduh di: https://www.academia.edu/1512766
Soemardjan, Selo. 1981. Perubahan Sosial di Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta(ID): Gadjah Mada University Press.
Stooffers, Jol., Agus Gunawan and Anne Kleefstra. 2018. “Social Entrepreneurships, An International Perspective”. Open Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 6. No. 10. Doi: 10.4326/jss.2018.610002.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1993. Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Alimandan, penerjemah. Tri Wibowo, editor. Jakarta (ID): Pranada Media Group. Terjemahan dari: The Sosiology of Social Change.
Tahir, Saidna Zulfiqar. 2015. “The Attitude of Santri and Ustadz Toward Multilingual Eduaction at Pesantren". International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 210-216
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. - Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).