Mekanisme Kemitraan dan Determinan Pemilihan Pola Kemitraan Usahaternak Ayam Broiler di Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat

  • Ujang Sehabudin Departemen Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan, FEM, IPB University
  • Warcito Warcito Pusat Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia, LPPM, IPB University
  • Muhammad Taufan Iskandar Departemen Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan, FEM IPB University
  • Yayan Hadiyat Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Pakuan, Bogor
Keywords: livestock business income, logit model, makloon pattern, PIR pattern

Abstract

The broiler industry is the livestock industry with the highest development compared to other livestock industries. The structure of the broiler industry, which is oligopoly in nature, causes the bargaining position of livestock companies, especially integrator companies, to be very large in determining input and output prices. In contrast with broiler breeders. Farmers face production risks, as well as input and output price risks. The partnership between livestock companies and breeders is one of the efforts to overcome the problems faced by breeders. The aims of this study were (1) to find out the mechanism of broiler farming partnerships, and (2) Analyze the determinants of selecting contract farming through the nucleus-plasma scheme (PIR) (PIR) or Makloon pattern. The research was located in Sukabumi Regency, which is a broiler production center in West Java Province. The research samples were PIR and Makloon breeders with 30 farmers each, who were PT. X (PIR pattern) and PT. Y (Macloon pattern). Data analysis using the Logit Model. The results of the study show that there are differences in the partnership mechanism between the PIR pattern and the Makloon pattern, especially the provision and cost of financing the main production facilities and operational costs, as well as the components of livestock business income. Livestock income and broiler chicken population are significant determinants in choosing a partnership pattern, but with different parameter signs, the PIR pattern is positive and the Makloon pattern is negative. This means that the higher the broiler livestock business income, the farmer tends to choose the PIR pattern, conversely if the livestock population is getting bigger, the breeder tends to choose the Makloon pattern

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basuki, A. 2017. Regresi Logistik: Bahan Ajar Ekonometrika. Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Populasi Ayam broiler menurut Provinsi (Ekor) 2018-2020. https://www.bps.go.id.
Farayola, C.O., I.A. Adedeji, P.O. Popoola, S.A. Amao. 2013. Determinants of participation of small scale commercial poultry farmers in agricultural insurance scheme in Kwara State, Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 1, No. 5, 96-100.
Hamzah, N.A., B. Kaur, N.H. Kamarulzaman. 2015. The Impact of Public Assisted contract farming programmes in Malaysia. Journal of Agribusiness Marketing Vol. 7 (2015): 1-15.
Hosmer, D.W., S. Lemeshow. 2000. Regresi logistik terapan: Edisi kedua. John Willey & Son, Inc: New York.
Illahi, N.M.A., I. Novita, dan S. Masithoh. 2019. Analisis pendapatan peternakan ayam broiler pola kemitraan di Kecamatan Nang-gung Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Agribisains. 5(2): 17-28.
Kumar, S. dan SR. Panigrahy. 2016. Farmers perspective towards existing poultry contract farming pola in Anand District of Gujarat. Economic Affairs 61(4): 741-746.
Masdar, A.S. dan Yunasaf. 2010. Kemitraan bidang perunggasan dan pengaruhnya terhadap pendapatan peternak. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. Bandung (ID): Universitas Padjajaran.
Murthy, M., S.B. Madhuri. 2013. A case study on suguna poultry production through contract farming in Andhra Pradesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review. 2(5): 58-68.
Nguyen, A.T., J. Dzator, A. Nadolny. 2015. Does contract farming improve productivity and income of farmers? A review of theory and evidence. The Journal of Developing Areas. 49(6): 531-538.
Notonegoro. 2010. Politik Hukum dan Pembangunan Agraria di Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): CV. Pancuran Tujuh.
Olagunju, F.I., R.O. Babatunde. 2011. Impact of credit on poultry productivity in South-Western Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Agri-cultural and Biological Science 6 (10): 58-65.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 1997 tentang Kemitraan.
Poojitha, S. 2018. A study on problems faced by contract broiler poultry farmers. International Journal of Research in Humanities. Vol. 6 (2018): 111-116.
Rehber, E. 2007. Contract Farming: Theory and Practice. The Icfai University Press, India.
Rokhman, M.S. 2012. Perbandingan antara model logit dan probit sebagai regresi untuk peubah respon kategori. Universitas Pancasakti, Tegal.
Sally, L. 2015. Under Contract: Comparative and Relative Risk in Livestock Production Contracts. International Master of Science in Rural Development from Ghent University (Belgium), Agrocampus Ouest (France), Humboldt University of Berlin (Germany), the Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovakia) and University of Pisa (Italy) in collaboration with Wageningen University (The Netherlands).
Salman, K., W.M. Ashagidigbi dan K.T. Jabar. 2010. Correlate of risk aversion among poultry egg farmers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Rural Economics and Development 19: 1-15.
Sasidhar, P.V.K. and M. Suvedi. 2015. Intergrated contract broiler farming: an evaluation case study in India.
Sumarno, B. Hartono, B.A. Nugroho, H.D. Utami. 2013. Farmers’ motivation in partnership farming system of broiler industry in East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 4(10).
Sriboonchitta, S., dan A. Wiboonpongse. 2005. Analysis of contract farming in Thailand. CMU Journal 4(3).
Published
2023-09-30
How to Cite
SehabudinU., WarcitoW., IskandarM. T., & HadiyatY. (2023). Mekanisme Kemitraan dan Determinan Pemilihan Pola Kemitraan Usahaternak Ayam Broiler di Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat. MANAJEMEN IKM: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, 18(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.29244/mikm.18.1.18-28
Section
Vol. 18 No. 1