Perbedaan Tekanan Mesin Cetak Pneumatik terhadap Kualitas Fisik Permen Ternak

The Pressure Differences in Pneumatic Machine on the Physical Quality of Cattle Candy

  • M A Rahman Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • D Suhendra Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Y L R E Nugrahini Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • I Taufik Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • R W Idayanti Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • T P Rahayu Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • N Hidayah Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar, Jl. Kapten Suparman 39 Magelang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Keywords: Phisical quality, cattle candy, pneumatic, pressure

Abstract

Cattle candy is made using a pneumatic machine, namely the pressure force generated by the air pressure coming from the compressor. This study aimed to examine the effects of different pressures in cattle feed supplement pneumatic machines on physical quality, including moisture content, density, durability, and specific gravity. The cattle candy was made from pollard (30%), brown rice bran (10%), molasses (35%), limestone (8%), salt (5%), premix (2%), urea (5%), white cement (2%) and turmeric flour (3%). The candy was made in a size of 1 kg with a diameter of 17 cm. The research design used a completely randomized design (CRD) which consisted of 4 treatments (pressure differences of 5, 6, 7 and 8 bars) with 5 replications. The results showed that the pressure difference of 5-8 bars did not affect the physical quality (moisture content, density, impact resistance, and specific gravity) of cattle candy. The candy had a range of moisture content, density, durability and the specific gravity of 0.88%-0.90%, 0.93-0.94 g cm-3, 99.94%-100.00%, and 1.21-1.29 g mL-1, respectively. The conclusion of this study was that the pressure of 5-8 bars had not changed the physical quality of cattle candy. The use of low pressure (5 bars) was enough to produce good-quality cattle candy.

Key words:        cattle candy, physical quality, pneumatic, pressure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhdiat, T, Widjaya N, Permana H, Christi RF & Suherna A. 2021. Pengaruh pemberian premix dalam ransum terhadap produksi dan kualitas susu sapi perah Friesian Holstein. Zootec, 41(2): 355-363

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (US): AOAC International.

Baihaqi B, Hendrawan AB & Usman MWJ. 2021. Analisis gerakan cylinder single acting pada alat peraga elektro pneumatik. Journal Mechanical Enginering, 10(10): 1-5

Bidura INPWS & Sudiastra IW. 2014. Pengaruh penggunaan pollard terfermentasi dengan ragi tape dalam ransum terhadap produksi telur ayam lohman brown. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 17(1): 4-9

Conover WJ. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. California (US): John Wiley and Sons.

Dewantari NR, Agustria NK, Besung & Sampurna P. 2016. Pengaruh pemberian mineral terhadap jumlah bakteri Escheria coli dan Coliform pada sapi bali dataran tinggi dan dataran rendah. Buletin Veteriner Udayana, 8(1): 71-78.

Goncalves AP, do Nascimento MCF, Ferreira FA, da Costa Gomes R. Manella M, Marino CT, de Abreu Demarchi JJA, & Rodrigues PHM. 2015. Slow release urea in supplement fed to beef steers. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 58(1): 22-30

Hadi NH, Wardhana H & Suryajaya. 2020. Pengaruh tekanan pada briket arang alaban ukuran partikel kecil. Risalah Fisika, 4(1): 19-26

Handayani IS, Tampoebolon BIM, Subrata A, Pujaningsih RI & Widiyanto. 2019. Evaluasi organoleptic multinutrien blok yang dibuat dengan menggunakan metode dingin pada perbedaan aras molases. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, 17(3): 64-68

Hartati SY. 2013. Khasiat kunyit sebagai obat tradisional dan manfaat lainnya. Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanaman Industri, 19(2): 5-9

Mubi AA, Kibon A & Mohammed D. 2013. Formulation and production of multinutrient blocks for ruminants in the guinea savanna region of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 4(3): 205-215

Nuningtyas YF, Ndaru PH & Huda AN. 2019. Pengaruh perbedaan molases sebagai penyusun urea molases blok (UMB) terhadap kualitas fisik pakan. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis, 2(1): 70-7

Parr A. 2011. Hydraulic and Pneumatic: A Technician’s and Engineer’s Guide Serves as Aguide. Manual Book. Oxford (US): United States of Kingdom. Elseveir.

Pratiwi AS, Situmeang RSS & Lestari SP. 2022. Rancang bangun alat pencetak biobriket campuran ampas teh tempurung kelapa ditinjau dari waktu karbonasi terhadap nilai kalor dan kadar air. Distilasi, 7(1): 8-17.

Pujaningsih RI, Prasetiyono BWHE, Mukodiningsih S, Tampoebolon BIM, & Utama CS. 2013. Kajian level kadar air dan ukuran partikel bahan pakan terhadap penampilan fisik wafer. Jurnal Agripet,13(1): 16-21.

Raza A, Saleem M, Anjum FM, Hussain S & Khan MR. 2018. Effect of drying temperature and drying time on physical and nutritional quality of apricot leather. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 42(3): e13566.

Septian MH, Bayuaji P, Sihite M, Aeni RN & Romadhon W. 2020. Pengaruh lama penyimpanan terhadap kadar air, sifat fisik, dan organoleptik bekatul beras merah. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis dan Ilmu Pakan, 2(4): 198-206

Setiowati R. & Tirono M. 2014. Pengaruh variasi tekanan pengepresan dan komposisi bahan terhadap sifat fisis briket arang. Jurnal Neutrino, 7(1): 23-31

Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). 2017. SNI 3148-2: 2017 Pakan Konsentrat - Bagian 2: Sapi Potong. Jakarta (ID): Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia.

Suryani E, Kartikasari LR, Astuti DA & Utami MM. 2021. Effect of giving mineral block candy on feed consumption and carcass quality of beef cattle. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1737(1): 012019

Steel RGD & Torrie JH 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Edisi ke-4. (Diterjemahkan oleh B. Sumantri). Jakarta (ID) : Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Susilawati I, Mansyur & Islami RZ. 2012. Penggunaan berbagai bahan pengikat terhadap kualitas fisik dan kimia pelet hijauan makanan ternak. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 12(1): 47-50.

Toharmat T, Nursasih E, Nazilah R, Hotimah N, Noerzihad TQ, Sigit NA & Retnani Y. 2006. Sifat fisik pakan kaya serat dan pengaruhnya terhadap konsumsi dan kecernaan nutrien ransum pada kambing. Media Peternakan, 29(1): 146-154.

Trisyulianti E, Suryahadi & Rakhma VN. 2003. Pengaruh penggunaan molases dan tepung gaplek sebagai perekat terhadap sifat fisik wafer ransum komplit. Media Peternakan, 26(2): 35-40.

Wahyono DN, Suwardi, Rakhman H & Hasanah H. 2021. Penyuluhan teknologi pengolahan permen sapi herbal dengan penambahan curcuma zedoaria di kelompok ternak limousin Jagur Desa Kemuning Lor Kabupaten Jember. Seminar Nasional Terapan Riset Inovatif, 7(3): 238-244.

Yanuartono K, Soedarmanto I, Nururrozi A, Purnamaningsih H & Raharjo S. 2019. Urea molasses multinutrien blok sebagai pakan tambahan pada ternak ruminansia. Jurnal Veteriner, 20(3): 445-451

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Mirza Aulia Rahman, D Suhendra, Y L R E Nugrahini, I Taufik, R W Idayanti, T P Rahayu, & N Hidayah. (2023). Perbedaan Tekanan Mesin Cetak Pneumatik terhadap Kualitas Fisik Permen Ternak: The Pressure Differences in Pneumatic Machine on the Physical Quality of Cattle Candy. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 21(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.21.2.137-142