Pengaruh Informasi Produk dan Harga terhadap Urutan Kesukaan Produk Susu Cokelat Siap Minum pada Konsumen Anak-Anak

  • Dede Robiatul Adawiyah Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Amalia Rakhmadani Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Lince Lince PT Nutrifood Indonesia, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Keywords: children panelist, hedonic rank test, LSD rank, milk chocolate

Abstract

Milk consumption in Indonesia decreased from 3.53 in 2020 to 2.72 kg per capita per year in 2021, prompting the food industry to enhance their products to increase milk consumption and gain a wider market. The hedonic ranking test requires panelists to rank the samples from most preferred to least preferred. Studies on food preferences have involved children to obtain accurate data for child consumers. This research aimed to determine the effect of price and product form information on the preference for chocolate milk products among children consumers. The samples consisted of four chocolate milk products in powder and ready-to-drink forms from two producers. The study recruited 120 children (46 boys and 74 girls aged 10-12 years) from schools in Jabodetabek. The hedonic ranking test method was used in three presentation types: (1) blind test (without additional information) 1 and 2, (2) price test, and (3) price test with product form information. Data analysis involved the Friedman test and LSD rank. Results indicated that the blind test 1, blind test 2, and price test showed a significant difference in preference at a significance level of 0.05. However, the price test with product form information did not demonstrate any significant differences in preferences, although some samples changed their ranking, specifically ready-to-drink milk. The milk drink with the lowest price was ranked 2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auf MAA, Meddour H, Saoula O, Majid AHA. 2018. Consumer buying behaviour: The roles of price, motivation, perceived culture importance, and religious orientation. J Bus Retail Manag Res 12(4): 177-186. DOI: 10.24052/JBRMR/V12IS04/ART-18.

Augustin MA, Margetts CL. 2003. Powdered Milk: Milk powders in the marketplace. 4694-4702. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition (Second Edition), Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00 955-X.

Chen AW, Resurreccion AVA, Paguio LP. 1996. Age appropriate hedonic scales to measure food preferences of young children. J Sens Stud 11(2): 141-163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1996.tb00038.x.

Joshua D, Padmalia M. 2016. Pengaruh kualitas produk dan harga terhadap keputusan pembelian konsumen. J Entrepreneur Entrepreneurship 5(1): 27-32. DOI: 10.37715/jee.v5i1.384.

Keefer HM, Sipple LR, Carter BG, Barbano DM, Drake MA. 2022. Children’s perceptions of fluid milk with varying levels of milkfat. J Dairy Sci 105(4): 3004-3018. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20826.

[Kementan] Kementrian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. 2021. Kementan berkomitmen kembangkan produksi susu segar dalam negeri. https://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id/berita/1340-kementanberkomitmen-kembangkan-produksi-susu-segar-dalam-negeri.

Kozak M, Cliff MA. 2013. Systematic comparison of hedonic ranking and rating methods demonstrates few practical differences. J Food Sci 78(8): 1257–1263. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12173.

Kurniawati T, Irawan B, Prasodjo A. 2019. Analisis pengaruh kualitas pelayanan, harga, dan brand image terhadap kepuasan konsumen restoran pizza hut cabang Jember. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi 6(2): 147-151. DOI: 10.19184/ejeba.v6i2.11159.

Lawless HT, Heymann H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principle and Practice. New York (US): Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5. ISBN: 978-1-4419-6487-8.

McCarthy KS, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2017. Milk fat threshold determination and the effect of milk fat content on consumer preference for fluid milk. J Dairy Sci 100(3): 1702-1711. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11417.

Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT. 2016. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Boca Raton (FL) New York: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b19493. ISBN: 97804291 95150.

Prakoso B. 2020. Analisis LSD Rank dan R-index pada Uji Ranking Hedonik untuk Produk Minuman Rasa Jeruk. [Skripsi]. Bogor: Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Putri EV, Prasmatiwi FE, Adawiyah R. 2015. Permintaan dan kepuasan konsumen rumah tangga dalam mengonsumsi susu bubuk di Bandar Lampung. J Ilmu-ilmu Agribisnis 3(4): 402–408.

Saraswati LGG, Suamba IK, Parining N. 2015. Faktor-faktor yang berperan dalam kepuasan konsumen mengonsumsi produk susu dancow instant enriched di kota Denpasar. E-J Agribisnis Agrowisata 4(4): 213-220.

Sihotang MK. 2020. Pengaruh harga dan kualitas produk terhadap keputusan pembelian produk (studi kasus pada konsumen produk PT. HNI HPAI). Triangle J Manag Accounting, Econom Bus 1(2): 399-413.

Sipple LR, Barbano DM, Drake MA. 2020. Invited review: Maintaining and growing fluid milk consumption by children in school lunch programs in the United States. J Dairy Sci 103(9): 7639-7654. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18216.

Ostwald C, Adhikari K, Mohan A. 2022. Effect of front-of-package labels on consumer product evaluation and preferences. Curr Res Food Sci 5: 131-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.016.

Vie A, Gulli D, O’mahony M. 1991. Alterntive hedonic measures. J Food Sci 56(1): 1–5. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1365-2621.1991.tb07960.x

Wichchukit S, O’Mahony M. 2014. The 9-point hedonic scale and hedonic ranking in food science: some reappraisals and alternatives. J Sci Food Agric 95(11): 2167–2178. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6993.

Published
2023-04-14
How to Cite
AdawiyahD. R., RakhmadaniA., & LinceL. (2023). Pengaruh Informasi Produk dan Harga terhadap Urutan Kesukaan Produk Susu Cokelat Siap Minum pada Konsumen Anak-Anak. Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmpi.2023.10.1.1
Section
Research Paper