Dinamika Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Surabaya sebagai Kota Hijau <i>Green Open Space Dynamics in Surabaya as a Green City</i>

Syafazerlinda (1) , Alinda Fitriany Malik Zain (2) , Didit Okta Pribadi (3)
(1) Magister Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(2) Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia; Pusat Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah (P4W), Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Pusat Riset Ekonomi Perilaku dan Sirkuler (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia; Pusat Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah (P4W), Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

Surabaya is the capital of East Java Province and one of the Indonesian cities that has implemented the Green City Development Program (P2KH). Surabaya received the 2017 Global Green City Award from the UN-supported Global Forum on Human Settlements (GFHS). This study examines the dynamics of green open space in Surabaya through changes in land-use/land-cover area and in green open space structure. Land Use-Cover Changes (LUCC) analysis was used to identify changes in green open space area between 2001, 2011, and 2021. FRAGSTATS and Landscape Dynamic Typology (LDT) analyses were used to assess structural dynamics of green open space in 2011-2021, including tendencies toward fragmentation, aggregation, gain, and loss. The results show that built-up land continued to increase, while green open space and blue open space tended to decrease, although the rates of change were lower in 2011-2021 than in 2001-2011. The LDT analysis indicates that Surabaya's green open space simultaneously experienced gains and losses, while conversion from green open space to built-up land was associated with area loss and fragmentation in many locations. This study provides empirical input for urban green space planning and management in Surabaya.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Aguilar, R., Cristóbal‐Pérez, E. J., Balvino‐Olvera, F. J., Aguilar‐Aguilar, M., Aguirre‐Acosta, N., Ashworth, L., … Quesada, M. (2019). Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: a global synthesis. Ecology Letters, 22(7), 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13272

Arifin, T., Nur Amri, S., Rahmania, R., Yulius, Ramdhan, M., Chandra, H., … Kurnia, R. (2023). Forecasting land-use changes due to coastal city development on the peri-urban area in Makassar City, Indonesia. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 26(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.02.002

Babí Almenar, J., Bolowich, A., Elliot, T., Geneletti, D., Sonnemann, G., & Rugani, B. (2019). Assessing habitat loss, fragmentation and ecological connectivity in Luxembourg to support spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189(...), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.004

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. (2021). Kota Surabaya Dalam Angka 2021. Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistika.

Blau, M. L., Luz, F., & Panagopoulos, T. (2018). Urban river recovery inspired by nature-based solutions and biophilic design in Albufeira, Portugal. Land, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040141

Carpio, A. J., Oteros, J., Tortosa, F. S., & Guerrero-Casado, J. (2016). Land use and biodiversity patterns of the herpetofauna: The role of olive groves. Acta Oecologica, 70, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.12.007

Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Kota Surabaya. (2017). Kota Surabaya Raih Penghargaan Global Green City 2017 Dari PBB. Retrieved February 2, 2022, from http://dpm-ptsp.surabaya.go.id/v3/detailpost/kota-surabaya-raih-penghargaan-global-green-city-2017-dari-pbb

Handayani, H. H., Estoque, R. C., & Murayama, Y. (2018). Estimation of built-up and green volume using geospatial techniques: A case study of Surabaya, Indonesia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.017

Joga, N., & Ismaun, I. (2011). RTH 30%! Resolusi (Kota) Hijau. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2013). Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.017

Karanikola, P., Panagopoulos, T., Tampakis, S., Simoglou, G., & Tzelepi, A. (2023). Perceptions of urban green infrastructure in two contrasting municipalities of the metropolitan area of Athens, Greece. Nature-Based Solutions, 3(April), 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100063

Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., & Lindquist, E. (2015). Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 352, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional (ATR/BPN) Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 14 Tahun 2022 tentang Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau. Jakarta: Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional (ATR/BPN) Republik Indonesia.

Kurniati, A. C., & Nitivattananon, V. (2016). Factors influencing urban heat island in Surabaya, Indonesia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.07.006

Kusuma, R. D., Purnomo, E. P., & Kasiwi, A. N. (2020). Analisis upaya Kota Surabaya untuk mewujudkan kota hijau (Green City). Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(1), 13–27.

Lausch, A., Blaschke, T., Haase, D., Herzog, F., Syrbe, R. U., Tischendorf, L., & Walz, U. (2015). Understanding and quantifying landscape structure - A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics. Ecological Modelling, 295, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.018

Machado, R., Godinho, S., Pirnat, J., Neves, N., & Santos, P. (2018). Assessment of landscape composition and configuration via spatial metrics combination: conceptual framework proposal and method improvement. Landscape Research, 43(5), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1336757

McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. In General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

Singh, S. K., Pandey, A. C., & Singh, D. (2014). Land Use Fragmentation Analysis Using Remote Sensing and Fragstats BT - Remote Sensing Applications in Environmental Research (P. K. Srivastava, S. Mukherjee, M. Gupta, & T. Islam, Eds.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05906-8_9

Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., & Merriam, G. (1993). Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544927

Teckentrup, L., Kramer-Schadt, S., & Jeltsch, F. (2019). The risk of ignoring fear: underestimating the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 34(12), 2851–2868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00922-8

Xu, F., Wang, Y., Xiang, N., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2020). Uncovering the willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation: A survey of the capital area in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162(June), 105053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105053

Zheng, L., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Quantifying the spatial impact of landscape fragmentation on habitat quality: A multi-temporal dimensional comparison between the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin of China. Land Use Policy, 125(388), 106463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106463

Zheng, Z. W., & Chou, R. J. (2023). The impact and future of edible landscapes on sustainable urban development: A systematic review of the literature. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 84(August 2022), 127930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127930

Authors

Syafazerlinda
sherly_syafazerlinda@apps.ipb.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Alinda Fitriany Malik Zain
Didit Okta Pribadi
Author Biographies

Alinda Fitriany Malik Zain, Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia; Pusat Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah (P4W), Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia

 

 

 

Didit Okta Pribadi, Pusat Riset Ekonomi Perilaku dan Sirkuler (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia; Pusat Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah (P4W), Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia

 

 

Dinamika Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Surabaya sebagai Kota Hijau: Green Open Space Dynamics in Surabaya as a Green City. (2025). Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning (Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perdesaan), 9(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2025.9.3.242-252

Article Details

How to Cite

Dinamika Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Surabaya sebagai Kota Hijau: Green Open Space Dynamics in Surabaya as a Green City. (2025). Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning (Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perdesaan), 9(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2025.9.3.242-252