Kinerja Pengolahan dan Karakteristik Fisikomia Total Mixed Ration (TMR) dengan Metode Pengawetan Hijauan Berbeda

Processing Performance and Physicochemical Characteristics of Total Mixed Ration with Different Forage Preservation Methods

Authors

  • N N Barkah Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • EB Laconi Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • M Hasan Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • HA Sukria Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Y Retnani Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • I Wijayanti Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.24.2.107-118

Keywords:

complete feed, napier grass, preservation technique, production process, processing performance

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the processing performance and physicochemical characteristics of total mixed ration (TMR) prepared using napier grass with different preservation methods. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three treatments and four blocks based on production time was employed, consisting of P1 = fresh napier grass, P2 = napier grass silage, and P3 = napier grass hay. The forage was processed using a chopper to obtain a particle size distribution consisting of 30% particles at 5 cm and 70% particles at 3 cm, and subsequently formulated into TMR containing 30% forage and 70% concentrate on a dry matter basis. The results showed that chopping particle size had a highly significant effect on forage loss during the chopping process (p<0.01). Different forage preservation methods had highly significant effects on dry matter content and TMR cost (p<0.01), and significant effects on the particle size distribution of forage and TMR and forage texture (p<0.05). The calculated nutrient composition of TMR varied among preservation methods, with ash, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) contents ranging from 7.95%–9.54%, 16.79%–17.85%, 3.31%–3.58%, 22.79%–25.19%, and 45.65%–47.66%, respectively, on a dry matter basis. These findings indicate that forage preservation methods influenced the processing performance, physical characteristics, and chemical composition-related attributes of TMR. It can be comcluded that the selection of an appropriate forage preservation method is important for achieving efficient TMR processing, desirable physicochemical characteristics, adequate nutrient composition, and economical TMR production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[BSN] Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2024. SNI 7785:2024 Mesin Pencacah Hijauan Pakan Ternak Syarat Mutu dan Metode Uji. Jakarta (ID): Badan Standardisasi Nasional

Aman & Harsita PA. 2019. Tiga pilar usaha ternak: breeding, feeding and management. Jurnal Sains Peternakan. 14(4):431–439. doi:10.31186/jspi.id.14.4.431-439.

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Ed ke-18. Gaithersburg (US): AOAC International.

Bueno AVI, Lazzari G, Jobim CC & Daniel JLP. 2020. Ensiling total mixed ration for ruminants: a review. Agronomy. 10:879. doi:10.3390/agronomy10060879.

Ardian A, Wikantara AA, Aditya ZA & Kusdiyarto P. 2024. Performance analysis of the fabricated animal feed mixer machine. Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology. 5(2):85–93. doi.org/10.21831/jeatech.v5i2.73308.

Banu M, Supratman H & Hidayati YA. 2020. The effect of various additive materials on physical quality and silage chemical rice chemistry (Zea mays L.). Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran. 19(2):6. doi.org/10.24198/jit.v19i2.22840.

Chanpla M, Kullavanijaya P, Janejadkarn A & Chavalparit O. 2017. Effect of harvesting age and performance evaluation on biogasification from Napier grass in separated stages process. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22:1–6. doi:10.1007/s12205-017-1164-y.

Despal, Permana IG, Safarina & Tatra AJ. 2011. Penggunaan berbagai sumber karbohidrat terlarut air untuk meningkatkan kualitas silase daun rami. Media Peternakan. 34(1):69–76. doi:10.5398/medpet.2011.34.1.69.

Dimaiwat MI, Belen GCC, Reyes FCC & Angeles AA. 2018. Analysis of feed mixer efficiencies of commercial feed manufacturers in

the Philippines from 2012 to 2016. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 44(2):103–110.

Dumadi EH, Abdullah L & Sukria HA. 2021. Kualitas hijauan rumput gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) berbeda tipe pertumbuhan: review kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan. 19(1):6–13. doi:10.29244/jintp.19.1.6-13.

Heriyanto ESG & Rahmadianto F. 2026. Perancangan mesin pengaduk pakan ternak dengan sirip model cakar untuk hasil pengadukan yang merata. Jurnal Mesin Material Manufaktur dan Energi. 6(1):84–90. doi:10.47549/jmmme.v6i1.16029.

Hediawan F, Cakra IGLO & Trisnadewi AA.AS. 2024. Kandungan nutrien silase rumput gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) dengan penambahan tepung daun gamal (Gliricidia sepium) pada level berbeda. Pastura: Jurnal Ilmu Tumbuhan Pakan Ternak. 14(1): 45–51.

Herrmann C, Prochnow A & Heiermann M. 2011. Influence of chopping length on capacities, labour time requirement and costs in the harvest and ensiling chain of maize. Biosystems Engineering. 110(3), 310–320. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.09.004

Irawati E, Purnamasari E & Arsyad F. 2019. Kualitas fisik dan nutrisi silase eceng gondok (Eichhornia crassipes) dengan lama fermentasi yang berbeda. Jurnal Peternakan. 16(1):18–24. doi:10.24014/jupet.v16i1.3679.

Juanda & Yuniar. 2018. Kualitas biskuit berbahan dasar hay petai cina dan rumput gajah sebagai bahan pakan ternak ruminansia. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan. 6:7–13.

Kamal A & Bandri S. 2023. Analisa pengaruh ketidakseimbangan tegangan motor induksi 3 fasa menggunakan MATLAB Simulink. Rang Teknik Journal. 6(2):167–175. doi:10.31869/rtj.v6i2.4154.

Kearl LC. 1982. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries. Logan (US): International Feedstuffs Institute, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University.

Kilic A. 1984. Silo Yemi (Silage Feed). Izmir (TR): Bilgehan Press.

Kurniati D, Hidayati N & Kurnadi B. 2021. Efek perbedaan teknik pengeringan terhadap kualitas hay rumput odot. Maduranch: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 6(1):9–14. doi:10.53712/maduranch.v6i1.1067.

Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ & Schmidt RJ. 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(5):4020–4033. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13909.

Kononoff PJ, Heinrichs AJ & Buckmaster DR. 2003. Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. Journal of Dairy Science. 86(5):1577–1587. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73773-4.

Lamid M, Wahjuni RS & Nurhajati T. 2016. Pengolahan silase dari hay (hay lase) sebagai bank pakan hijauan dengan konsentrat untuk penggemukan sapi potong di Kecamatan Arosbaya. Jurnal Agroveteriner. 5(1):74–80.

Landupari M, Foekh AHB & Utami KB. 2020. Pembuatan silase rumput gajah odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) dengan penambahan berbagai dosis molasses. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. 22(2):249–253. doi:10.25077/jpi.22.2.249-253.2020.

Lammers BP, Buckmaster D &, Heinrichs AJ. 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science. 79(5):922–928. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76442-1.

Martins LF, Cueva SF, Wasson DE, Silvestre T, Stepanchenko N, Hile ML & Hristov AN. 2024. Separate offering of forages and concentrates to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 107(7):4587–4604. doi:10.3168/jds.2023-24261.

McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA & Wilkinson RG. 2022. Animal Nutrition. Ed ke-8. Singapore (SG): Pearson.

McEllhlary RR. 1994. Feed Manufacturing Technology IV. Arlington (US): American Feed Industry Association Inc.

Panjaitan U. 2020. Perancangan mesin pencacah rumput multifungsi dengan metode VDI 2221. Presisi: Jurnal Teknik Mesin. 22(1):65–78.

Piran Filho FA, Bragatto JM, Parra CS & et al. 2023. Physical effectiveness of corn silage fractions stratified with the Penn State Particle Separator for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 106(9): 6041–6059. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-23063.

Daniel JLP. 2023. Physical effectiveness of corn silage fractions. Journal of Dairy Science. 106:6041–6059. doi:10.3168/jds.2022-23063.

Putra MS, Ali U, Muwakhid B. 2021. Pengaruh penggunaan konsentrat dalam pakan total mixed ration terhadap kandungan lemak, laktosa, dan solid non fat susu segar sapi PFH. Jurnal Dinamika Rekasatwa. 4(2):252–256.

Rasuli N, Wibowo DN, Taufik M. 2022. Kajian kualitas silase rumput gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) dengan penambahan lamtoro (Leucaena leucocephala), dedak, dan jagung giling. Jurnal Agrisistem. 18(1):28–34. doi:10.52625/j-agr.v18i1.223.

Rustiyana E, Liman, Fathul F. 2016. Pengaruh substitusi rumput gajah (Pennisetum purpureum) dengan pelepah daun sawit terhadap kecernaan protein kasar dan kecernaan serat kasar pada kambing. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu. 4(2):161–165.

Santi RK, Fatmasari D, Widyawati SD, Suprayogi WPS. 2012. Kualitas dan nilai kecernaan in vitro silase batang pisang dengan penambahan beberapa akselerator. Tropical Animal Husbandry. 1(1):15–23.

Santosa. 2017. Aplikasi Keteknikan Pertanian untuk Budidaya Padi. Padang (ID): Penerbit Erka dan CV Rumahkayu Pustaka Utama.

Santosa, Putri I, Fauzi FF. 2024. Analisis tekno-ekonomi mesin pencacah hijauan (chopper) tipe vertikal di Kelompok Tani Harapan Sejahtera Aie Pacah dengan perlakuan ragam bahan uji. GreenTech: Revolutionizing Agro-Industrial Engineering for Sustainable Agriculture. 1(1):1–38. doi:10.25077/greentech.v1i1.1.

Sari NN, Salim II, Achmad MM. 2018. Uji kinerja dan analisis biaya mesin pencacah pakan ternak (chopper). Jurnal AgriTechno. 11(2):113–120. doi:10.20956/at.v11i2.115.

Sarwanto D, Wasito. 2023. Produktivitas rumput gajah kerdil pada berbagai sistem penanaman. Jurnal Zootek. 43(1):80–86.

Sadarman, Juliantoni J, Febrina D, Prastyo AB, Fazly M, Qomariyah N. 2024. Transformasi silase: profil terbaru rumput odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) dan dedak padi dengan penggunaan sirup afkir. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis. 7(1):58–67. doi:10.21776/ub.jnt.2024.007.01.7.

Savoie, P., Tremblay, D., Theriault, R., Wauthy, J.-M., & Vigneault, C. (1989). Forage chopping energy vs. length of cut. Transactions of the ASAE. 32(2):437–442. doi: 10.13031/2013.31022

Setyaningsih D, Apriyantono A, Sari MP. 2010. Analisis Sensori untuk Industri Pangan dan Agro. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.

Sianturi TL, Saparin, Rodiawan, Setiawan Y, Wijianti ES. 2025. Modifikasi mesin pencacah rumput gajah menghasilkan bahan baku kompos. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Terapan. 3(1):145–149. doi:10.33504/jitt.v3i1.337.

Singleton VL, Rossi JA. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 16:144–158.

Sofyan A, Widyastuti Y, Utomo R, Yusiati LM. 2017. Improving physico-chemical characteristics and palatability of king grass (Pennisetum hybrid) silage by inoculation of Lactobacillus plantarum saccharomyces cerevisiae consortia and addition of rice bran. Buletin Peternakan. 41(1):61–71. doi:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i1.12980.

Tessalonika O, Hernaman I, Rusmana D. 2026. Pengaruh berbagai imbangan EM4 dan molasses dalam pembuatan dedak padi fermentasi terhadap kualitasnya. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu. 14(1):173–185. doi:10.23960/jipt.v14i1.p173-185.

Wati WS, Mashudi, Irsyammawati A. 2018. Kualitas silase rumput odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott) dengan penambahan Lactobacillus plantarum dan molasses pada waktu inkubasi yang berbeda. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis. 1(1):45–53.

Wiguna IA, Patty CW, Fredriksz S. 2024. Kualitas fisik silase jerami padi dengan penambahan dosis EM4 yang berbeda sebagai pakan ternak ruminansia. Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech. 3(1):127–133. doi:10.30598/j.agrosilvopasture-tech.2024.3.1.127.

Yuvita D, Mustabi J, Asriany A. 2021. Pengujian karakteristik dan kandungan lemak kasar silase pakan komplit yang berbahan dasar eceng gondok (Eichhornia crassipes) dengan lama fermentasi yang berbeda. Buletin Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak. 14(2):14–27. doi:10.20956/bnmt.v14i2.12550.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Kinerja Pengolahan dan Karakteristik Fisikomia Total Mixed Ration (TMR) dengan Metode Pengawetan Hijauan Berbeda: Processing Performance and Physicochemical Characteristics of Total Mixed Ration with Different Forage Preservation Methods. (2026). Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 24(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.24.2.107-118