Enzymatic and Antibacterial Activity of Low-pH and Pepsin-Modified Freeze-Dried Lysozyme from Local Chicken Egg White

Syahrizal Nasution (1) , Eni Kusumaningtyas (2) , Didah Nur Faridah (3) , Zakiah Wulandari (1) , Harsi Dewantari Kusumaningrum (3)
(1) Department of Food Technology, Sumatera Institute of Technology, Lampung Selatan, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(2) Research Center for Veterinary Science, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong Science Center, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Division of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

The research aimed to isolate and modify lysozyme from local chicken egg white to improve the antibacterial activity of lysozyme hydrolysates, and to characterize the isolated and modified lysozyme. Lysozyme was isolated from local chicken egg white using an ion-exchange resin. The lysozyme isolate was then modified with pepsin in a low-pH solution, and the pepsin-modified samples were neutralized to pH 7 before testing. The enzymatic activity of lysozyme was measured spectro-photometrically using Micrococcus lysodeikticus. The antibacterial activity of lysozyme was tested using the microdilution method. The lysozyme was characterized by SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC. The yield of lysozyme isolate was 5.35±0.23% (n= 3) with a lysozyme concentration of 41.07±4.44 mg/g (n= 3). After dialysis, the lysozyme concentration was 143.24±8.32 mg/g (n= 3). The enzymatic activity of the lysozyme isolate was 4,778±1,835 unit/mg (n= 3). The modification of lysozyme improved its antibacterial activity by decreasing its MIC value from 6 mg/mL (or >6 mg/mL) to 3 mg/mL and increasing its antibacterial spectrum to include Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Escherichia coli. However, all low-pH treatments against E. coli reduced the MIC value only from >6 mg/mL to 6 mg/mL. The SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC profiles of the lysozyme isolate showed that it had the same molecular weight (MW) and retention time (RT) as the standard lysozyme, with values of approximately 14.70±0.43 kDa (n= 3) and 43.59±0.09 min (n= 3), respectively. The modification of lysozyme also affected its enzymatic activity and SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC profiles, explaining why the antibacterial activity increased.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abdou, A. M., Higashiguchi, S., Aboueleinin, A. M., Kim M., & Ibrahim, H. R. (2007). Antimicrobial peptides derived from hen egg lysozyme with inhibitory effect against Bacillus species. Food Control 18(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.09.010

Abeyrathne, E. D. N. S., Lee, H. Y., & Ahn, D. U. (2013). Sequential separation of lysozyme and ovalbumin from chicken egg white. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 33(4), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.4.501

Abeyrathne, E. D. N. S., Lee, H. Y., & Ahn, D. U. (2014). Sequential separation of lysozyme, ovomucin, ovotransferrin, and ovalbumin from egg white. Poultry Science, 93(4), 1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03403

Balouiri, M., Sadiki, M., & Ibnsouda, S. K. (2016). Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 6(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005

Biswas, A. A., Lee, S. S, Mamuad, L. L., Kim, S.-H., Choi, Y.-J., Bae, G.-S., Lee, K., Sung, H.-G., & Lee, S.-S. (2016). Use of lysozyme as a feed additive on in vitro rumen fermentation and methane emission. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 29(11), 1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0575

Carrillo, W., García-Ruiz, A., Recio, I., & Moreno-Arribas, M. V. (2014). Antibacterial activity of hen egg white lysozyme modified by heat and enzymatic treatments against oenological lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria. Journal of Food Protection, 77(10), 1732–1739. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-009

Carrillo, W., Lucio, A., Gaibor, J., Morales, D., & Vásquez, G. (2018). Isolation of antibacterial hydrolysates from hen egg white lysozyme and identification of antibacterial peptides. Journal of Medicinal Food, 21(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2017.0134

Carrillo, W., & Ramos, M. (2018). Identification of antimicrobial peptides of native and heated hydrolysates from hen egg white lysozyme. Journal of Medicinal Food, 21(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2017.0132

Carrillo, W., Tubon, J., & Vilcacundo, R. (2016). Isolation of hen egg white lysozyme by cation exchange chromatography, analysis of its digestibility and evaluation of the inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the zebrafish model. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 9(3), 345–349.

Cegielska-Radziejewska, R., Leśnierowski, G., & Kijowski, J. (2008). Properties and application of egg white lysozyme and its modified preparations – A review. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 58(1), 5–10.

Emami, F., Vatanara, A., Park, E. J., & Na, D. H. (2018). Drying technologies for the stability and bioavailability of biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics, 10(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030131

Ibrahim, H. R, Higashiguchi, S., Koketsu, M., Juneja, L. R., Yamamoto, T., Sugimoto, Y., & Aoki, T. (1996). Partially unfolded lysozyme at neutral pH agglutinates and kills Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria through a membrane damage mechanism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44(12), 3799–3806. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960133x

Kusumaningtyas, E., Sembiring, B. B. R., Andriani, Suwito, W., Endrawati, D., Widiyanti, P. M., Ariyanti, T., & Nasution, S. (2025). In vitro antimicrobial activity of modified lysozyme (Lys 90) and herbal extracts against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. Online Journal of Biological Sciences, 25(3), 815–823. https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2025.815.823

Kusumaningtyas, E., Widiastuti, R., Kusumaningrum, H. D., & Suhartono, M. T. (2016). Bioactivities and analysis of peptides of Sumbawa horse milk generated by Bacillus thuringiensis protease. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner, 21(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v21i4.1627

Kwon, J. I., Park, Y., Han, S. H., & Suh, H. J. (2017). Hydrolysate preparation with high content of 5-hydroxytryptophan from liquid egg protein and its sleep-potentiating effects. Food Science of Animal Resources, 36(5), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.5.646

Lee, D.-E., Jung, T.-H., Jo, Y.-N., Yun, S.-S., & Han, K.-S. (2019). Enzymatic hydrolysis of egg white protein exerts a hypotensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Food Science of Animal Resources, 39(6), 980–987. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e91

Lesnierowski, G., & Stangierski, J. (2018). What's new in chicken egg research and technology for human health promotion? – A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 71, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.022

Memarpoor-Yazdi, M., Asoodeh, A., & Chamani, J. (2012). A novel antioxidant and antimicrobial peptide from hen egg white lysozyme hydrolysates. Journal of Functional Foods, 4(1), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011.12.004

Mine, Y., Ma, F., & Lauriau, S. (2004). Antimicrobial peptides released by enzymatic hydrolysis of hen egg white lysozyme. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52(5), 1088–1094. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0345752

Nasution, S., Kusumaningtyas, E., Faridah, D. N., & Kusumaningrum, H. D. (2018). Lysozyme from chicken egg white as an antibacterial agent. Wartazoa, 28(4), 175–188.

Nasution, S., Faridah, D. N., Kusumaningtyas, E., Zakiah, W., & Kusumaningrum, H. D. (2019). Antibacterial activity and RP-HPLC characteristic of lysozyme from local chicken egg white after modification treatments. In Proceedings of the 2nd SEAFAST International Seminar (Vol. 1, pp. 84–88). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009979300840088

Nasution, S., Faridah, D. N., Kusumaningtyas, E., Zakiah, W., & Kusumaningrum, H. D. (2021). Profil SDS-PAGE dan aktivitas lisozim putih telur ayam lokal termodifikasi panas. Jurnal Pangan dan Agroindustri, 9(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpa.2021.009.01.7

Priyadarshini, S., & Kansal, V. K. (2002). Lysozyme activity in buffalo milk: Effect of lactation period, parity, mastitis, season in India, pH and milk processing heat treatment. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15(6), 895–899. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.895

Rao, S., Sun, J., Liu, Y., Zeng, H., Su, Y., & Yang, Y. (2012). ACE inhibitory peptides and antioxidant peptides derived from in vitro digestion hydrolysate of hen egg white lysozyme. Food Chemistry, 135(3), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.059

Rathnapala, E. C. N., Ahn, D. U., & Abeyrathne, E. D. N. S. (2021). Enzymatic hydrolysis of ovotransferrin and the functional properties of its hydrolysates. Food Science of Animal Resources, 41(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e19

Stevens, L. (1991). Egg white proteins. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry, 100(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(91)90076-P

Wulandari, Z. (2018). Karakteristik lisozim pada telur unggas lokal sebagai pemanis [Doctoral dissertation, IPB University]. IPB University Repository, Bogor, ID.

You, S.-J., Udenigwe, C. C., Aluko, R. E., & Wu, J. (2010). Multifunctional peptides from egg white lysozyme. Food Research International, 43(3), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.12.004

Authors

Syahrizal Nasution
syahrizal.nasution@tp.itera.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Eni Kusumaningtyas
Didah Nur Faridah
Zakiah Wulandari
Harsi Dewantari Kusumaningrum
Nasution, S., Kusumaningtyas, E., Faridah, D. N., Wulandari, Z., & Kusumaningrum, H. D. (2026). Enzymatic and Antibacterial Activity of Low-pH and Pepsin-Modified Freeze-Dried Lysozyme from Local Chicken Egg White. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Industri Pangan, 37(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2026.37.2.171

Article Details

How to Cite

Nasution, S., Kusumaningtyas, E., Faridah, D. N., Wulandari, Z., & Kusumaningrum, H. D. (2026). Enzymatic and Antibacterial Activity of Low-pH and Pepsin-Modified Freeze-Dried Lysozyme from Local Chicken Egg White. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Industri Pangan, 37(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2026.37.2.171