Persepsi dan Tantangan Sertifikasi Perikanan Berkelanjutan oleh Perusahaan Pengolahan Produk Perikanan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jmpi.2025.12.2.188Keywords:
aquaculture, blue food, certification, perceptionAbstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) reflect a commitment to utilizing natural resources for human well-being. This includes efforts to promote a sustainable food system, including fishery products known as blue food. Sustainable aquaculture certification is important to ensure that products come from responsible sources, considering aspects of food safety, environment, animal welfare, and social responsibility. This study aims to assess the perception of companies towards the certification, including knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and challenges in sustainable aquaculture certification. The survey was conducted on thirty respondents from aquaculture processing companies, divided into fifteen certified companies and fifteen uncertified companies. Certified companies showed good knowledge and attitude percentage scores (100%), and good behavior (93.3%). Meanwhile, uncertified companies had good knowledge (80%) and attitude (93.3%), but lower behavior (73.3%). This shows a behavioral gap in the uncertified group, even though they have a positive attitude towards sustainability certification. Significant correlations (p<0.05) between variables were identified between knowledge-behavior (rs=0.515), attitude-behavior (rs=0.639), attitude-challenge (rs=0.620), and behavior-challenge (rs=0.902). In uncertified companies, no significant correlation was found. This finding indicates that certified companies have a strong relationship between understanding, attitude, and behavior even though the companies are aware of the major challenges in implementation, while uncertified companies face structural or motivational barriers that hinder behavior even though they have a positive attitude. The main challenge faced by certified and uncertified companies is the limited knowledge of the team in implementation, with percentages of 40 and 46%, respectively. In addition, both groups of companies also face challenges related to the excessive cost of certification, which is recognized by 33% of each group.
Downloads
References
Alayón CL, Säfsten K, Johansson G. 2022. Barriers and enablers for the adoption of sustainable manufacturing by manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability. 14 (4): 2364. doi:10.3390/su14042364
Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alam MM. 2013. A probit estimation of urban bases of environmental awareness: evidence from Sylhet City, Bangladesh. Development Compilation. 9 (1): 1–14. doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2107.08342
Amalia RN, Dianingati RS, Annisaa’ E. 2022. Pengaruh jumlah responden terhadap hasil uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner pengetahuan dan perilaku swamedikasi. J Res in Pharmacy. 2 (1): 9–15. doi:10.14710/genres.v2i1.12271
[ASC] Aquaculture Stewardship Council. 2023. Chain of Custody Module ASC-COC-001 Version 1.2. London: Marine Stewardship Council
Azizah FFN, Ishihara H, Zabala A, Sakai Y, Suantika G, Yagi N. 2020. Diverse perception on eco-certification for shrimp aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability. 12 (22): 9387. doi:10.3390/su12229387
Barua A. 2013. Methods for decision-making in survey questionnaires based on Likert scale. J Asian Sci Res. 3 (1): 35–38.
[BAP] Best Aquaculture Practice. 2024. Who we are. https://www.bapcertification.org/WhoWeAre [diakses 16 September 2024].
[BAP] Best Aquaculture Practice. 2024. Seafood Processing Standard – Core Issue 6.0. https:// www.bapcertification.org/Standards [diakses 7 Desember 2024].
Carlson A, Palmer C. 2016. A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labelling in developing countries. Ecological Economics. 127: 129–145. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.020
Coffay M, Tveterås R, Bocken N, Bogers MLAM. 2024. Sustainable business model innovation, dynamic capabilities, and organizational design: insights from Norwegian aquaculture. Bus Stra-tegy Environ. 33 (2): 897–913. doi:10.1002/bse.3762
Fauzi A. 2010. Ekonomi Perikanan: Teori, Kebijakan dan Pengelolaan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Field A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022. Trade of fisheries and aquaculture products. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9df19f53-b931-4d04-acd3-58a71c6b1a5b/content/sofia/2022/trade-of-aquatic-products.html [diakses 18 Mei 2025].
González-Estrada E, Cosmes W. 2019. Shapiro-wilk test for skew normal distribution based on data transformations. J Stat Comput Simul. 89 (17): 3258–3271. doi:10.1080/00949655.2019.1658763
Haimeur A, Meskini N, Mimouni V, Ulmann L, Messaouri H, Pineau-Vincent F, Abouakil N, Tremblin G. 2019. A comparative study on the effect of argan oil versus fish oil on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in high-fat-fed rats. Nutrition. 57 (2019): 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.027
Hammarlund C, Svensson K, Asche F, Bronnmann J, Osmundsen T, Nielsen R. 2024. Eco-certification in aquaculture – economic incentives and effects. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 33 (3): 402–415. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2024.2440712
Inara C. 2020. Manfaat asupan gizi ikan laut untuk mencegah penyakit dan menjaga kesehatan tubuh bagi masyarakat pesisir. J Kalwedo Sains. 1 (2): 92–95. doi: 10.30598/kasav1i2p92-95
Ion R, Daniela P, Sterie C, Tarhini M. 2022. Food certification: bibliometric analysis. Int J Sustain Economies Management (IJSEM). 11 (1): 1–8. doi:10.4018/IJSEM.302649
Kaimakoudi E. 2024. Policy initiatives towards enhancing consumer knowledge and tackling consumer confusion in the aquaculture sector. Aquaculture Int. 32: 1-9. doi:10.1007/s10499-023-01143-2
[KKP] Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. 2023. Angka Konsumsi Ikan. https://portaldata.kkp.go.id/portals/data- statistik/aki/tbl-dinamis [diakses 18 Mei 2025]
Mavraganis T, Constantina C, Kolygas M, Vidalis K, Nathanailides C. 2020. Environmental issues of aquaculture development. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 24 (2): 441–450. doi:10.21608/ejabf.2020.85857
[MSC] Marine Stewardship Council. 2023b. The Marine Stewardship Council Annual Report 2022-23. London: Marine Stewardship Council.
Nakavachara V, Thongtai C, Chalidabhongse T, Pharino C. 2025. Ethical appetite: consumer prefe-rences and price premiums for animal welfare-friendly food products. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04042 [diakses pada 18 Mei 2025].
Pramoda R, Putri HM. 2017. Penerapan sertifikasi aquaculture stewardship council (ASC) terhadap produk udang budidaya (studi kasus: Tarakan – Kalimantan Utara). J Borneo Administator. 13 (2): 89–109. doi:10.24258/jba.v13i2.308
Purnamadewi YL, Firdaus M. 2018. Strategi pengem-bangan perikanan dalam pembangunan ekonomi wilayah di Jawa Timur. Ekuitas: J Ekonomi dan Keuangan. 18 (3): 155–170. doi:10.24034/j25485024.y2014.v18.i3.155
Raudah U, Pranola L, Anazatri JW. 2023. IUU fishing, permasalahan dan upaya pencegahannya di perairan Indonesia. J Administrative and Social Science. 4 (1): 1–10. doi:10.55606/jass.v4i1.106
Rebouças LT, Santiago LB, Martins LS, Menezes ACR, da Purificação Nazaré Araújo M, de Castro Almeida RC. 2017. Food safety knowledge and practices of food handler, head chef and managers in hotels restaurant of Salvador, Brazil. Food Control. 73: 372–381. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont. 2016.08.026
Rueda X, Garret RD, Lambin EF. 2017. Corporate investment in supply chain sustainability: selecting instrument in the agri-food industry. J Cleaner Prod. 142 (4): 2480–2492. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2016.11.026
Salladarré F, Brécard D, Lucas S, Ollivier P. 2016. Are French consumer ready to pay a premium for eco-labeled seafood products? A contingent valuation estimation with heteroheneous anchoring. Agricultural economics. 47 (2): 247–258. doi:10.1111/agec.12226
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Taherdoost H. 2016. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of questionnaire/survey in research. SSRN Electronic J. 5(3): 28–36. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Ukkas I. 2017. Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja industri kecil kota Palopo. J Islamic Education Management. 2 (2): 187–198. doi:10.24256/kelola.v2i2.440
Vitale S, Biondo F, Giosuè C, Bono G, Okpala COR, Piazza I, Sprovieri M, Pipitone V. 2020. Consumer perception and willingness to pay for eco-labeled seafood in Italian hypermarkets. Sustainability. 12 (4): 1434. doi:10.3390/su12041434
Wiranthi PE, Toonen HM, Oosterterveer P. 2024. Understanding group capabilities for small-sale tuna fishery certification in Indonesia. Maritime studies. 23 (2024): 42. doi:10.1007/s40152-024-00383-z
Xu P, Zeng Y, Fong Q, Lone T, Liu Y. 2012. Chinese consumer willingness to pay for green-and eco-labeled seafood. Food Control. 28 (1): 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.008
Zhou G, Hu W, Huang W. 2016. Are customers willing to pay more for sustainable products? A study of eco-labeled tuna steak. Sustainability. 8 (5): 494. doi:10.3390/su8050494
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Padma Rizki Dwi Arieanti Arsyad, Winiati P. Rahayu, Siti Nurjanah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
