Estetika Visual Karakter Lanskap di Kawasan Tepian Air Kampung Ciomas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v18i2.73059Keywords:
landscape character, PCA biplot, scenic beauty estimation, semantic differentialAbstract
Ciomas Village, located in Kertamaya Village between the Cisadane Riverbank and Ciomas Train Station, has landscape characters with different visual aesthetic qualities. The existing landscape condition is less attractive and needs assessment because the area is directed to support ecotourism development. This study aimed to identify landscape character distribution, identify visual aesthetic values, and analyze the visual aesthetic quality of each character. A descriptive qualitative method was applied through field observation, character identification, photo documentation, and visual assessment. The results showed that landscape characters with low and very low visual aesthetic values were associated with irregular environments, pavement dominance, slum impressions, poor spatial arrangement, weak integration with surrounding elements, and inadequate planning. Landscape characters with medium, high, and very high values were associated with orderly environments, neat spatial organization, absence of slum impressions, and integration with the surrounding landscape. Very high visual aesthetic quality was characterized by natural features across landforms, supported by proximity, height, base area proportion, and balance among landscape elements. The study concludes that overall visual quality remains relatively low and is not sufficient to support ecotourism. Environmental improvement based on landscape characteristics is needed to enhance visual quality and strengthen its potential as an ecotourism area.
Downloads
References
Agustin OD, Simangunsong NI, Hakim R. 2021. Penilaian Kualitas Estetika Visual Lanskap pada Koridor Jalan Raya Bandara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 13(2): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli. v13i2.33324
Anwar S, Kaswanto RL. 2021. Analysis of Ecological and Visual Quality Impact on Urban Community Activities in Bogor City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 879(1): 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/879/1/012035
Asrina M, Gunawan A, Munandar A. 2017. Identification Of Minangkabau Landscape Characters. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 91(1): 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/91/1/012018
Bell S. 2001. Landscape Pattern, Perception and Visualisation in the Visual Management of Forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 54(1-4): 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00136-0
Daniel TC, Boster RS. 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Fort Collins (CO): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station.
Dewi E, Sarilestari W. 2019. Penilaian Kualitas Estetika Lanskap Kota Bogor dengan Menggunakan Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE). IKRA-ITH-Teknologi 2(2):1-8. https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-teknologi/article/view/462
Gunawan A, Yoshida H. 1994. Visual Judgement on Landscape and Land Use of Bogor Municipality. Bulletin of the Kyoto University Forests. 66:119-131. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/192063
Handriana T, Ambara R. 2016. Responsible Environmental Behavior Intention of Travelers on Ecotourism Sites. Tourism and Hospitality Management 22(2):135–150. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.22.2.4
Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 2007. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.
Jollife IT, Cadima J. 2016. Principal Component Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 374(2065). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Kuper R. 2017. Evaluations of Landscape Preference, Complexity, and Coherence for Designed Digital Landscape Models. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2016.09.002
Kurniasari E, Rustiadi E, Tonny F. 2013. Strategi Pengembangan Ekowisata Melalui Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat, Studi Kasus Komunitas Kelurahan Kalimulya Kota Depok. Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah 5(2):32–47. https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnal_mpd.v5i2.24637
Kusumoarto A, Gunawan A, Machfud, Hikmat A. 2019. Visual Aesthetic Analysis of Post-Mining Area For Ecotourism Destination. AES Bioflux 11 (3): 133-158. https://aes.bioflux.com.ro/docs/2019.133-158.pdf
Kusumoarto A, Renjoni R, Risnadewi N, Kristiana E. 2024. Desain Rest Area di Kampung Ciomas, Kelurahan Kertamaya, Kecamatan Bogor Selatan. Jurnal Teknik 25(2):29–34. https://doi.org/10.33751/teknik.v25i2.11234
Lestari G, Gunawan A. 2010. Pengaruh Bentuk Kanopi Pohon terhadap Kualitas Estetika Lanskap Jalan. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 2(1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.2010.2.1
Li K, Zhai Y, Dou L, Liu J. 2021. A Preliminary Exploration of Landscape Preferences Based on Naturalness and Visual Openness for College Students With Different Moods. Frontiers in Psychology 12 June. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.629650
Mantja K, Dungga NE, Rahmat NM. 2023. Preferensi Visual Terhadap Dominasi Elemen yang Berbeda di SMA Negeri 9 Makassar. Jurnal Lanskap dan Lingkungan 1(2): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.20956/julia.v1i2.32361
Misgav A. 2000. Visual Preference of the Public for Vegetation Groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning 48(3-4): 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00038-4
Ode Å, Tveit M, Fry G. 2008. Capturing landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory. Landscape Research 33(1): 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701773854
Osgood CE, Suci G, Thannenbaum P. 1957. The measuring of Meaning. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Press.
Pamungkas AA, Pratiwi PI, Sulistyantara B. 2025. Pengaruh Elemen Lanskap Taman Kota Bogor pada Psiko-Fisiologi, Visual Behavior, dan Persepsi dengan Metode Eye-Tracking. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 17(1): 102–110. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v17i1.58325
Park BJ, Furuya K, Kasetani T, Takayama N, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. 2011. Relationship Between Psycological Responses and Physical Environments in Forest Settings. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning 102: 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.005
[Perda] Peraturan Daerah Kota Bogor. 2020. Peraturan Daerah Kota Bogor Nomor 8 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Ruang terbuka Hijau.hlm 1–43.
Perovic S, Folic NK. 2012. Visual Perception of Public Open Space in Niksic. Journal of Social and Behavioral Science 68: 921-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.277
Putra IPAH, Asmiwyati IGAAR. 2025. Penilaian Kualitas Visual Lanskap pada Koridor Jalan Bypass Dharma Giri Kota Gianyar. Jurnal Arsitektur Lansekap 11(1): 134–144. https://doi.org/10.24843/JAL.2025.v11.i01.p14
Qi T, Zhang G, Wang Y, Liu C, Li X. 2017. Research on Landscape Quality of Country Parks in Beijing as based on Visual and Audible Senses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 26: 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug. 2016.12.007
Rachmawati S, Mahendra AS, Gestan DAm Ramadhani G, Koesdaryanto NS, Karina R, Firmansyah F. 2024. Analisis Tingkat Kebisingan Lingkungan Akibat Revitalisasi di Jembatan Jurug Surakarta. Jurnal Reka Lingkungan 12(2): 159–171. https://ejurnal.itenas.ac.id/index.php /lingkungan/article/view/11367
Rahmadi MH. 2017. Survey Kenyamanan dan Keamanan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) Publik di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi 14(1): 113–125. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v14i1.11
Rahmat F, Winiasri L, Rozi F. 2025. Perencanaan Pembuatan Saluran Drainase Terbuka pada Area Jalan Akses Menuju Terminal 1 Bandar Udara Internasional Juanda Surabaya. Prosiding SNITP (Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi Penerbangan) 9(1). https://ejournal.poltekbangsby.ac.id/index.php/SNITP/article/view/2473
Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T. 2009. Mapping Community Values for Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics 68(5): 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
Senoglu B, Oktay HE, Kinoshita I. 2018. An Empirical Research Study on Prospect–Refuge Theory and the Effect of High-Rise Buildings in a Japanese Garden SETTING. City, Territory and Architecture 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-018-0079-3
Sevenant M, Antrop M. 2009. Cognitive Attributes and Aesthetic Preferences in Assessment and Differentiation of Landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 90(9):2889–2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.016
Shayestefar M, Pazhouhanfar M, van Oel C, Grahn P. 2022. Exploring the Influence of the Visual Attributes of Kaplan’s Preference Matrix in the Assessment of Urban Parks: A Discrete Choice Analysis. Sustainability 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127357
Shen J, Han C, Li G, Wang X. 2023. Influencing Factors in Visual Preference Assessment of Redeveloped Urban villages in China: A Case Study of Guangdong Province. BUILDINGS 13(3): 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030612
Sitanggang BN, Herlina N. 2021. Tingkat Kenyamanan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) Taman Hutan Kota dan Taman Wilis Kota Batu The Comfort Level of the Green Open Space of the City Forest Park and Wilis City Park. Jurnal Produksi Tanaman 9(5):333–340. https://protan. studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/protan/article/view/1555/1544
Solimun, Fernandes AAR, Nurjannah. 2017. Pemodelan Statistika Multivariat: Pemahaman Praktis Analisis Multivariat. Malang: UB Press.
Teh MZ, Abdullah M, Pugi NA, Rahman NA. 2018. Visual Landscape Assessment : A Method for Analysing and Planning for Landscape Structure. Asian Journal of Quality of Life 3(14): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v3i14.181
[TIES] The International Ecotourism Society, Fact Sheet: Global Ecotourism. 1990. Washington, DC, USA. https://ecotourism.org
Tveit MS. 2009. Indicators of Visual Scale as Predictors of Landscape Preference; a Comparison between Groups. Journal of Environmental Management 90(9): 2882–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021
[USDA] United State Departement of Agriculture. 1973. National Forest Landscape Management, Vol. 2, Chapter 1: The visual management system USDA forest service. USA.
Wang R, Zhao J, Liu Z. 2016. Consensus in Visual Preferences: The Effects of Aesthetic Quality and Landscape Types. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005
Widowati W, Muzdalifah L. 2017. Perbandingan Analisis Biplot Klasik dan Robust Biplot pada Pemetaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Matematika (JRAM) 1(1): 27. https://doi.org/10.26740/jram.v1n1.p27-39
Yulianti DS, Adriani H, Syahadat RM. 2020. Evaluasi Daya Tarik Wisata di Kebun Raya Cibodas dalam Sudut Pandang Kualitas Visual. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 12(1): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v12i1.32578
Yuniarti E, Soekmadi R, Arifin HS, Noorachmat BP. 2018. Analisis Potensi Ekowisata Heart of Borneo di Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun dan Danau Sentarum Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan 8(1): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.8.1.44-54
Zhang G, Yang J, Wu G, Hu X. 2021. Exploring the interactive Influence on Landscape Preference from Multiple Visual Attributes: Openness, Richness, Order, and Depth. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 65 August:127363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127363
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrianto Kusumoarto, Rahmat Rejoni, Nindi Risnadewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites or institutional repositories both prior to and after publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable, its publication in this journal. However, after the article is submitted and published in this journal, it is fully copyrighted by the Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia or JLI. If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author must obtain written permission from the copyright owner and give credit to the source in the article. Then, the writer or reader is allowed to copy, share, and redistribute articles/material in any form. But it must still include the appropriate source and credit because the article in this journal is licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
I. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
II. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
