Evaluasi Ketersediaan Fasilitas pada Hutan Kota Patriot Bina Bangsa sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi di Kota Bekasi

Authors

  • Farra Chintya Lubis Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Silia Yuslim Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Etty Indrawati Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Olivia Seanders Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v18i2.62337

Keywords:

accessibility, Bekasi City, facilities, recreational area, urban forest

Abstract

Urban forests serve as vital green open spaces with three main functions: physical and social, ecological, and aesthetic. The Patriot Bina Bangsa (PBB) Urban Forest in Bekasi City is an important recreational area located amid  dense settlements and the government center in a city marked by high population density and Rapid urbanization . However, its current condition is inadequate, with insufficient facilities and limited attractions, that reduce its appeal to visitors. This research evaluates the urban forest’s facilities as a recreational area to provide recommendations for future planning by the local government. Unlike previous studies that primarily examined  visitor perspectives regarding comfort, utilization, and management, this research evaluates facilities related to the physical and social functions of urban forests for recreation assessed from an expert team’s perspective. A quantitative descriptive approach was used, incorporating observation and evaluation tools such as questionnaires, with variables covering accessibility, recreational facilities, support services, and attractions. These were further discussed in a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The findings indicate that most variables, such as facilities and infrastructure for recreation, support services, and attractions, fall into the less-to-sufficient categories, with accessibility was rated as good. The study recommends further research to identify optimal design alternatives that enhance the functionality and attractiveness of the urban forest as a recreational area, contributing to improved utilization and visitor experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bekasi. 2022. Kota Bekasi dalam Angka 2022. Kota Bekasi.

Agustin OD, Simangunsong NI, Hakim R. 2021. Penilaian Kualitas Estetika Visual Lanskap Pada Koridor Jalan Raya Bandara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia. 13(2): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v13i2.33324

Akbar IZ, Afrianti C, Kaswanto RL, Wiyoga H, Mosyaftiani A. 2025. The Role of Monitoring Carbon Storage and Sequestration in Advancing the Vision of Forest City: Lesson Learned from Urban Forest Assessment in Bandung, West Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1447(1): 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1447/1/012026

Andre J, Maullana I. 2022. Disinggung sudah ketinggalan zaman oleh Ridwan Kamil, begini kondisi Hutan Kota Bekasi. Kompas. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/01/13/16251451/disinggung-sudah-ketinggalan-zaman-oleh-ridwan-kami-begini-kondisi-hutan (diakses 13 Januari 2025)

Arikunto S. 2019. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Aulia R, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS, Mosyaftiani A, Syasita N, Wahyu A, Wiyoga H. 2023. Assessing the Benefits and Management of Urban Forest in Supporting Low Carbon City in Jakarta, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24:6151-6159. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d241136

Bachtiar Y. 2022. Tak Hanya Taman Hutan Kota, Gubernur Ridwan Kamil Berencana Desain Ulang Lokasi Wisata di Bekasi. TribunJakarta. https://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2022/01/19/tak-hanya-taman-hutan-kota-gubernur-ridwan-kamil-berencana-desain-ulang-lokasi-wisata-di-bekasi

Baker FB. 2001. The Basics of Item Response Theory. Second. Boston Carol, Rudner L, editor. Wisconsin: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

Chealsiyana HF, Sugiarti C, Atthahara H. 2021. Implementasi Program Pengelolaan dan Penataan Hutan Kota Patriot Bina Bangsa di Kota Bekasi. EnviroScienteae 17(1): 38–46.

Chen WY, Li X. 2021. Urban Forests’ Recreation and Habitat Potentials in China: A Nationwide Synthesis. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 66: 127376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127376

Dewi IK, Febriani Y, Djakakapermana RD, Widyana I, Hakim MA. 2024. Konsep Desain Taman Lingkungan Berbasis Partisipasi Masyarakat di Kelurahan Tanah Baru Kecamatan Bogor Utara. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 16(1): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v16i1.48096

Dosenovic L, Trkulja T, Sekulic M. 2017. Recreation Function of Forest Complexes as an Element of Urban Planning: A View from Republic of Srpska. Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering 15(1): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE161125007D

Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen FS, Lucas B, Marzano M, Montagné C, Peace A, Weiss G. 2012. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: Towards a pan-European perspective. Forest Policy and Economics 19: 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.006

Evert B, Yuwono SB, Duryat D. 2017. Tingkat Kenyamanan di Hutan Kota Patriot Bina Bangsa Kota Bekasi. Jurnal Sylva Lestari 5(1):14–25. http://doi.org/10.23960/jsl1514-25

Febiola MF, Soelistyari HT, Alfian R. 2024. Analisis Tingkat Kenyamanan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik pada Taman Alun-Alun Merdeka Kota Malang. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 16(2): 154–160. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v16i2.50231

Font X, Tribe J. 2000. Forest Tourism and Recreation: Case Studies in Environmental Management. Volume ke-22. CABI; Illustrated edition.

Fredisa Y, Karlinasari L, Kaswanto RL, Siregar IZ. 2025. The Role of Urban Forest in Providing Landscape Services: A Case Study from Bekasi City, West Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management) 15(5): 890-903. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.15.5.890

Fyall A, Callod C, Edwards B. 2003. Relationship Marketing: The Challenge for Destinations. Annals of Tourism Research 30(3): 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(03)00046-XGetrightsandcontent

Handayani H, Ahmed Y. 2022. Studi Analisis Struktur dan Komposisi Vegetasi Hutan Kota Cibubur dan Hutan Kota Patriot. Metrik Serial Teknologi dan Sains 3(2): 109–114. https://doi.org/10.51616/teksi.v3i2.356

https://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2022/01/19/tak-hanya-taman-hutan-kota-gubernur-ridwan-kamil-berencana-desain-ulang-lokasi-wisata-di-bekasi (diakses 19 Januari 2025)

Janti S. 2014. Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas dengan Skala Likert terhadap Pengembangan SI/TI dalam Penentuan Pengambilan Keputusan Penerapan Strategic Planning pada Industri Garmen. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains & Teknologi (SNAST) 2014. Yogyakarta,. hlm. 155–160.

Karim RN, Saroinsong FB, Kalangi JI. 2021. Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Taman Nukila Kota Ternate. Agri-Sosioekonomi 17(3): 901–908. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.17.3.2021.37240

Kaswanto RL, Rahmafitria F, Mosyaftiani A, Wiyoga H. 2024. The Effect of Environmental Knowledge and Perceived Value on Visitor Experience in Forest Recreation. Media Konservasi 29(3): 419-424. https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.29.3.419

Kusuma IA, Yuslim S, Indrawati E. 2022. The Application of Educational Tourism in the Forest City of Tebet, South Jakarta. Journal of Synergy Landscape 2(1): 204–214. https://doi.org/10.25105/tjsl.v2i1.14858

Mahri D, Maya M, Kulliyega I. 2020. Recreational Education Activities and Introduction to Surrounding Nature. Journal Educational Verkenning 1(2): 20–25. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i2.55

Mala YP, Kalangi JI, Saroinsong FB. 2019. Pengaruh Ruang Terbuka Hijau Terhadap Iklim Mikro dan Kenyamanan Termal pada 3 Lokasi di Kota Manado. EUGENIA 24(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.35791/eug.24.2.2018.22658

Maulana R, Riska AS, Kusuma HE. 2021. Fungsi Hutan Kota: Korespondensi Motivasi Berkunjung dan Kegiatan. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 13(2): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v13i2.34925

McDonald RP. 1999. Test Theory A Unified Treatment. Ed ke-1. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Mosyaftiani A, Wahyu A, Kaswanto RL, Wiyoga H, Syasita N, Septa AF, Djauhari D. 2022. Monitoring and Analyzing Tree Diversity Using i-Tree Eco to Strengthen Urban Forest Management. Biodiversitas 23(8): 4033-4039. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230822

Mutia F, Idawati DE, Dewi C. 2021. Studi Pemanfaatan Taman Hutan Kota Patriot Bina Bangsa di Kota Bekasi Sebagai Ruang Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Arsitektur dan Perencanaan 5(4): 10–16.

Pambudi BP, Tambunan MP. 2021. Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan Ruang Terbuka Hijau terhadap RTRW Kota Bekasi. Media Komunikasi Geografi 22(2):183–194. https://doi.org/10.23887/mkg.v22i2.38729

Pemerintah Pusat. 2002. Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 63 Tahun 2002 tentang Hutan Kota. Jakarta (ID): Pemerintah Pusat. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/52604

Permata ND, Syartinilia, Munandar A. 2018. Pemanfaatan Hutan Kota di Wilayah Jakarta Timur Sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi Masyarakat Kota. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 10(2): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v10i2.21926

Potoboda NI, Kalangi JI, Saroinsong FB. 2021. Analisis Kebisingan Beberapa Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kota Manado. COCOS 13(1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.35791/cocos.v2i2.32483

Pratiwi LY, Tohjiwa AD, Mildawani I. 2020. Produksi Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Taman Terpadu dan Respon Warga di Taman Kelurahan Pondok Jaya, Kota Depok. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 12(2): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v12i2.32521

Rachmawan D, Nurlia A, Surati, Ekawati S, Aulia R, Hanif MF, Kaswanto RL, Kusumaningrum D, Rosyidy MK, Hidayat H, Siburian R, Warsilah H, Farandy AR. 2026. Jakarta’s Urban Forest Management and Its Management: Revealing the Taken-for-Granted Benefits. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2026.2636170

Rahman F, Kalangi JI, Saroinsong FB. 2017. Analisis Kebutuhan Luasan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Kota Manado Berdasarkan Fungsi Penyedia Oksigen. COCOS 9(5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35791/cocos.v1i1.18900

Rahmansyah MA, Purnamasari WD, Parlindungan J. 2024. Pengembangan Taman Kota Berdasarkan Kesesuaian Elemen Fisik terhadap Pemanfaatan RTH Publik di Taman Lokomotif Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 16(2): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v16i2.53261

Regita RS, Simangunsong NI, Chalim A. 2021. Kajian Peletakan Fungsi Vegetasi Terhadap Kondisi Ruang Terbuka Kampus (Studi Kasus: Indonesia Port Corporation University, Ciawi, Bogor). Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 13(2): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v13i2.33327

Salsabila SH, Nugrahani P, Santoso J. 2020. Toleransi Tanaman Lanskap Terhadap Pencemaran Udara di Kota Sidoarjo. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 12(2): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v12i2.32533

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Suhadi PA, Kaswanto, Permatasari PA. 2026. Landscape Services Management of Carbon Stock and Thermal Comfort Patriot Bina Bangsa Urban Forest Bekasi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1622(1): 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1622/1/012018

Triana D, Aspar, Jumarni, Dariati T. 2020. Strategi Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 11(2): 43–47. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v11i2.22116 .

Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J. 2007. Tools for Mapping Social Values of Urban Woodlands and Other Green Areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003 .

Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T. 2003. A Monitoring Tool for the Provision of Accessible and Attractive Urban Green Spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 63(2): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5

Wajchman-Świtalska S, Zajadacz A, Lubarska A. 2021. Recreation and Therapy in Urban Forests—The Potential Use of Sensory Garden Solutions. Forests 12(10): 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101402

Warsono H. 2012. Pembelajaran Aktif: Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Yuslim S, Indrawati E. 2022. Performance Evaluation of City Parks Based on Sustainable Landscape Design in Jakarta. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota 18(2): 150–163. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v18i2.37887

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Lubis, F. C., Yuslim, S., Indrawati, E., & Seanders, O. (2026). Evaluasi Ketersediaan Fasilitas pada Hutan Kota Patriot Bina Bangsa sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi di Kota Bekasi. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 18(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v18i2.62337