HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DENGAN EFEKTIVITAS GERAKAN SOSIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v13i2.73586Keywords:
community participation, effectiveness, eviction, social movementAbstract
Social movements emerge as a response to injustices experienced by communities, particularly in cases of eviction. Community participation is an important factor in determining the effectiveness of social movements, as active involvement can strengthen solidarity and increase the likelihood of achieving the movement’s goals. This study aims to analyze the level of community participation, examine the effectiveness of the social movement, and identify the relationship between the two. The study employs a quantitative approach supported by qualitative data. The respondents consist of 36 households from Kampung Susun Bayam, selected using a census sampling method. The results show that the level of community participation is high in the stages of implementation, benefit utilization, and evaluation, while participation in the planning stage is partly at a moderate level. The effectiveness of the social movement is categorized as high. Correlation analysis indicates that there is a relationship between the level of community participation and the effectiveness of the social movement.
Downloads
References
Alfandi D, Qurniati R, Febryano IG. 2019. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Mangrove. Jurnal Sylva Lestari 7(1): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl1730-41
Bailey ER, Wang D, Soule SA, Rao H. 2023. How Tilly’s WUNC Works: Bystander Evaluations of Social Movement Signals Lead to Mobilization. American Journal of Sociology 128(4): 1206–1262. https://doi.org/10.1086/723489
Barlan ZA, Hamida S, Suryaalim AMA, Hakim L, Gandi R, Arsyad AA. 2025. Analisis Kesiapan Jogja Smart Service (JSS) dalam Mendukung Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 12(3): 232-239. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i3.69442
Carvacho H, González R, Cheyre M, Rocha C, Cornejo M, Jiménez-Moya G, Livingstone A. 2023. When Social Movements Fail or Succeed: Social Psychological Consequences of a Collective Action’s Outcome. Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1155950. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.1155950
Fatin AN, Kaswanto RL, Nurhayati HSA. 2025. Contribution of KWT Gardens to Plant Biodiversity and Carbon Stock in Bogor City. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 19 (2): 137-151. https://doi.org/10.24843/SOCA.2025.v19.i02.p06
Hapsari P, Nurhayati, Kaswanto RL. 2025. Analisis Potensi Daya Tarik Wisata Lanskap Budaya Jayengan Kampung Permata Surakarta. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 17(1): 34-42. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v17i1.55465
Hardianti S. 2019 Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Desa (Program Alokasi Dana Desa di Desa Buntongi Kecamatan Ampana Kota).
Hartanto MFB, Aziz DAN, Suntoro A. 2023. Karakteristik Penggusuran di Indonesia: Pentingnya Intervensi HAM sebelum, sewaktu, dan setelah Penggusuran. Jurnal HAM 14(2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2023.14.169-184
Hendri N, Wirman HP. 2017. Gerakan Radikalisme Islam (Ancaman Ideologi Radikalisme Islam terhadap Kebhinekaan di Sumatera Barat). IAIN Bukittinggi Press
Hooper M, Ortolano L. 2012. Confronting Urban Displacement: Social Movement Participation and Post-Eviction Resettlement Success in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32(3): 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12440775
Ihsan H, Rini WDE. 2025. Tipe Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Kegiatan Wisata di Taman Wisata Tebing Breksi Kalurahan Sambirejo Kapanewon Prambanan Kabupaten Sleman. Agrisocio Business 4(2): 125–132. https://doi.org/ 10.31315/agrisociabus.v4i2.15650
Indriana H, Akbar H. 2024. Tipologi Konformitas Sosial Kelompok Petani Kecil dalam Merespon Kebijakan Pertanian Organik di Tasikmalaya Jawa Barat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2): 92-101. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.56645
Jamal Z, Alaydrus A, Dyastari EL. 2018. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan di Desa Tanjung Limau Kecamatan Muara Badak Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. eJournal Administrasi Negara 6(3): 7988–8001.
Khaliq KH, Wulandari I, Dwi Bachtiar El-Rizaq A. 2025. Gerakan Sosial Pemuda dalam Melestarikan Program Word Clean-up Day Indonesia (WCDI) di KPMM. SOC EDUC. 12(2):188–207. https://doi.org/ 10.31571/sosial.v12i2.9210
Kristianto FAN. 2015. Partisipasi Masyarakat Kecamatan Kalibawang dalam Gerakan “Bela-Beli Kulon Progo”. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 12(1): 50–61.
Muhartono R, Nurlaili. 2022. Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bantaran Sungai dengan Kegiatan Budidaya Keramba Ikan Arus Deras (Kasus Sungai Pesanggrahan di DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(1): 52-60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28065
Permatasari PA, Arifin HS, Kaswanto RL, Mulyana E. 2025. Residential Landscape Management Practices and Environmental Contributions to ESG. Highlights of Sustainability 5(1): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain5010012
Prasetyo AS, Musabbikhin A, Satmoko S. 2020. Hubungan Kohesivitas dengan Partisipasi Anggota pada Kelompok Tani Ternak Rejeki Lumintu di Kelurahan Sumurrejo Kecamatan Gunungpati Kota Semarang. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 13(3): 232–241. https://doi.org/10.19184/ jsep.v13i3.18537
Riyadi A, Rahmasari A, Sugiarso S. 2022. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pemberdayaan Melalui Program Bank Sampah Gomi di Kelurahan Mijen, Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat 8(1): 193–218. https://doi.org/10.32678/lbrmasy.v8i1.5873
Riyanto M, Kovalenko V. 2023. Partisipasi Masyarakat Menuju Negara Kesejahteraan: Memahami Pentingnya Peran Aktif Masyarakat dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Bersama. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5(2): 374–388. https://doi.org/10.14710/ jphi.v5i2.374-388
Sukmana O. 2013. Konvergensi antara Resource Mobilization Theory dan Identity-Oriented Theory dalam Studi Gerakan Sosial Baru. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif 8(1): 39–62.
Thohir MA. 2024. Pembangunan, Kaum Miskin Kota, dan Aktivisme: Studi Kasus Penggusuran Kampung Kentingan Baru, Kota Solo. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 13(2): 249–270. https://doi.org/10.20961/ jas.v13i2.78683
Ulum S, Dewi SA. 2021. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Desa Wisata Gamplong. Jurnal Manajemen Publik dan Kebijakan Publik 3(1): 14–24. https:// doi.org/10.36085/jmpkp.v3i1.1408
Zaera MRP. 2024. Faktor dan Dampak dari Peningkatan Urbanisasi di DKI Jakarta pada Tahun 2023. Jurnal Wahana Bina Pemerintah 6(1): 38–42. https://doi.org/10.55745/jwbp.v6i1.167
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisya Zahra Noorrahma, Zessy Ardinal Barlan, Lukman Hakim, Rajib Gandi, Sampean, Andi Muhammad Agriawan Suryaalim, Ahmad Aulia Arsyad, Ghilandy Ramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
