KORELASI ANTARA PERAN MANAJERIAL KETUA BUMDES DAN TINGKAT KEBERHASILAN BUMDES MURINDAU SEJAHTERA BERSAMA DI DESA TALANG LINDUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v13i2.72992Keywords:
BUMDes, village enterprise leader, leader, successAbstract
Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are rural economic institutions established to improve community welfare and strengthen the village economy through the management of local potential. The success of BUMDes is influenced not only by capital and institutional aspects, but also by the managerial role of the head of BUMDes. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the managerial role of the head of BUMDes and the level of success of BUMDes Murindau Sejahtera Bersama. The study involved 33 respondents consisting of the village head, BUMDes managers, and community members involved in BUMDes activities through questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using the Spearman Rank correlation test with the assistance of IBM SPSS Statistics 22. The results showed that the managerial role of the head of BUMDes had a significant correlation with the success level of BUMDes, with a correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.833 (p < 0.001), indicating a very strong positive correlation. The relationship was reflected in the sustainability of business units, the effectiveness of organizational management, community motivation and participation, village government support, and the availability of facilities and infrastructure. However, the contribution of BUMDes to Village Original Revenue (PAD) has not yet been optimal. Therefore, strengthening the managerial role of the head of BUMDes, particularly in business development strategies, organizational governance, and community participation, is necessary to optimize the contribution of BUMDes to Village Original Revenue (PAD) sustainably.
Downloads
References
Asmiwyati IGAAR, Sukewijaya IM, Kaswanto RL, Utami NWF, Krisnandika AAK, Saputra KE, Pranditha IDGAS, Megisterina. 2026. Biodiversity and Carbon Stock Estimation to Mitigate Climate Change in Tukad Yeh Kajang riparianscape of Marga Village, Tabanan, Bali. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1608(1): 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1608/1/012055
Bahri S, Kurniati E. 2025. Strategi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Perkotaan–Pedesaan: Studi Kasus Provinsi Lampung. GLOBAL: Jurnal Lentera BITEP 3(3): 117–131.
Chotimah C, Widodo R, Handayani T. 2019. Efektivitas Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa Bululawang. Jurnal Civic Hukum 4(2): 103–113.
Hadi JK. 2021. Kedudukan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. JURIDICA 3(1): 29–52.
Hakim L, Kaswanto RL, Barlan ZA, Sarvianto DF, Arsyad AA, Gandi R, Mahardika AR, Sjaf S, Iskandar TM. 2025. Drone Participatory Mapping: Instrumen Mediasi untuk Reformasi Tata Kelola Aset Koperasi Maju Sejahtera. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 12(3): 200-214. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i3.66671
Heryana AY, Nurhascaryani P. 2025. Implementasi Kebijakan BUMDes Berbadan Hukum di Kabupaten Sumenep Provinsi Jawa Timur. Disertasi. Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri. Sumedang.
Ibisono RAA, Kartodihardjo H. 2019. Kelembagaan Hutan Rakyat Studi Kasus Kelompok tani Taruna Tani Desa Karyasari Kecamatan Leuwiliang Bogor. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(3): 226–238.
Iskandar AH. 2020. SDGs Desa: Percepatan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Nasional Berkelanjutan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.
Lestari R, Hakim R, Purnomo T. 2025. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat melalui Revitalisasi BUMDes sebagai Layanan Sosial di Desa Kertosari Kecamatan Lumajang Kabupaten Lumajang. SELAYAR: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 1(2): 43–50.
Malaikosa. 2024. Penguatan Kapasitas Kelembagaan dan Literasi Digital dalam Pengembangan BUMDes. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat 5(2): 88–97.
Meilana R, Yanfika H, Hasanuddin E. 2022. Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Dinamika dan Keberhasilan BUMDes dalam Mengembangkan Perekonomian Masyarakat Desa di Kabupaten Pesawaran. JIA Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis 8(1): 1–8.
Mintzberg H. 1989. Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations. Simon and Schuster. New York.
Mucharam I, Rustiadi E, Fauzi A, Harianto. 2022. Signifikansi Pengembangan Indikator Pertanian Berkelanjutan untuk Mengevaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Pertanian Indonesia. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(2): 61-81. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i2.28038
Muhartono R, Nurlaili. 2022. Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bantaran Sungai dengan Kegiatan Budidaya Keramba Ikan Arus Deras (Kasus Sungai Pesanggrahan di DKI Jakarta). Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(1): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28065
Nurman N, Hidayat A, Anggraini E. 2019. Analisis Kelembagaan Pengendalian Hama Terpadu Perkebunan Teh Rakyat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(3): 201–216.
Rasulong ESE, Amang HB, Mapparenta H, Djamereng ASE. 2025. Entrepreneurial Fit Model: Strategi Inovatif dalam Optimalisasi Pengelolaan BUMDes. Penerbit Widina. Bandung.
Rettob AM, Kaswanto RL, Yovi EY. 2025. Strategi Pengelolaan Agroforestri Dusung Berkelanjutan di DAS Wai Batu Gajah: Pendekatan Berbasis SWOT. Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (Journal of Watershed Management Research) 9(1): 55-78. https://doi.org/10.59465/jppdas.2025.9.1.55-78
Safitri R, Wijayantini B, Winahyu P. 2021. Analisis Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Komunikasi terhadap Kinerja Pengelola Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) di Desa Cangkring Kecamatan Jenggawah Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Agribest 5(2): 112–121.
Shaffitri LR, Syaukat Y, Ekayani M. 2016. Peranan BUMDes dalam Pengelolaan Limbah Cair Tahu dan Pemanfaatan Biogas. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 2(2): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.29244/ jkebijakan.v2i2.10984
Sholahudin U, Wahyudi MH, Hariri A. 2017. Pemerintah Desa Pasca UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 (Studi tentang Implementasi Otonomi Desa di Desa Paciran Kabupaten Lamongan). Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan 11(2): 145–155.
Siradjuddin I, Anshar M. 2025. Analisis Peran dan Strategi Pengembangan BUMDes dan Koperasi Merah Putih untuk Ekonomi Lokal di Lembang Angin-Angin. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 12(3): 215–224. https://doi.org/10.29244/ jkebijakan.v12i3.68919
Sjaf S, Kaswanto RL, Hidayat NK, Barlan ZA, Elson L, Sampean S, Gunadi H. 2021. Measuring Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Area: A Case Study of Sukamantri Village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22500/9202133896.
Suhardiman S, Juniarti A, Setia BI. 2024. The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment and Policy Implementation in Improving the Performance of Bumdes. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen 17(2): 17–28.
Umar FQ, Tawakkal GTI, Sobari W. 2023. Analisis Kepemimpinan Politik BUMDes Kerto Raharjo dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ekowisata Boonpring. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial 7(2): 419–446.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qur’atul Aini, Zessy Ardinal Barlan, Lukman Hakim, Andi Muhammad Agriawan Suryaalim, Rajib Gandi, Sampean, Ahmad Aulia Arsyad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
