MITIGASI PENGENDALIAN LAJU INFLASI PAPUA PEGUNUNGAN MELALUI KETERSEDIAAN KOMODITAS BAHAN PANGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i2.64058Keywords:
Inflasi, Komoditas, Pangan, Papua Pegunungan, StrategiAbstract
Keberadaan komoditas bahan pangan menjadi lumbung utama kehidupan manusia karena berkaitan langsung dengan ketahanan pangan secara global dan berperan dalam pengendalian inflasi suatu daerah. Saat ini Provinsi Papua Pegunungan memiliki tingkat inflasi sebesar 5,09% secara nasional dengan andil pengendali inflasi terbesar adalah kelompok makanan seperti beras dan cabai. Penelitian ini merupakan riset awal sebelum penelitian lanjutan dan bertujuan untuk memitigasi pengendalian inflasi dengan strategi menjaga ketersediaan komoditas bahan pangan di Provinsi Papua Pegunungan melalui kebijakan pemerintah daerah dan kerjasamanya dengan Bank Indonesia yang pada umumnya berdampak pada masyarakat dan pelaku usaha. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan secara studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bentuk mitigasi pengendalian inflasi di Provinsi Papua Pegunungan dapat dilakukan dengan menjaga ketersediaan komoditas bahan pangan melalui kebijakan pemerintah daerah yang bekerja sama dengan stakeholder, perbankan dan juga akademisi dalam mengembangkan kluster komoditas bahan pangan di tiap desa, melakukan pengendalian produksi (prediksi) melalui penentuan waktu tanam komoditas yang dibudidayakan, melakukan operasi pasar dengan memperhatikan rantai pemasaran komoditas bahan pangan, menentukan batasan harga jual sehingga tidak ada lagi pedagang pengecer yang seenaknya menentukan harga jualnya dan melakukan pengembangan program kampung peduli Inflasi.
Downloads
References
Adlini MN, Dinda AH, Yulinda S, Chotimah O, Merliyana SJ. 2022. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 6(1): 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.
Aji AM, Mukri SG. 2020. Strategi Moneter Berbasis Ekonomi Syariah (Upaya Islami Mengatasi Inflasi). Edisi Revisi. Deepublish.
Alfianti S, Nurrika RP, Astuti U, Habibah MY, Shudur D, Triiswanto. 2024. Fungsi Pengawasan pada Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan terhadap Perbankan. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu 2(5): 90-93. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v2i5.424.
Azis A, Suryana EA. 2023. Komparasi dan Implementasi Kebijakan Digitalisasi Pertanian: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10(3): 179-198. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i1.62166.
Bondansari, Widiatmaka, Machfud, Munibah K, Ambarwulan W. 2024. Kebijakan Menuju Kemandirian Beras di Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(1): 33-45. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i1.53470.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2024. Berita Resmi Statistik, No. 150/08/94/2024: Perkembangan Indeks Harga Konsumen Provinsi Papua Pegunungan Agustus 2024. www.bps.go.id
Ikmaludin, Kusumah C, Amirudin S. 2018. Tipologi Sistem Budidaya Pertanian dan Keberlanjutan Ketersediaan Pangan pada Masyarakat Adat Kasepuhan Ciptagelar Sukabumi. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 5(1): 14-26. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v5i1.2875.
Kaswanto RL, Aurora RM, Yusri D, Sjaf S, Barus S. 2021. Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Komoditas Unggulan Pertanian di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 19(2): 189-205. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v19n2.2021.189-205.
Marina I, Andayani SA, Dinar, Dani U, Sumantri K. 2021. Pendampingan Program Pengendalian Inflasi Daerah pada Klaster Cabai Merah. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2(3): 775-779. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v2i3.1199.
Marina I, Lestari DA. 2017 Pentingnya Data Deret Waktu dalam Melakukan Perencanaan Produksi (the Importance of time Series Data in Production Planning).
Marina I. 2019. Model Kapasitas Produksi Tomat di Sentra Produksi Kabupaten Majalengka. Agrivet: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian dan Peternakan (Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veteriner) 7(1): 19-26.
Moleong LJ. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Nugraha, Ryan, Varlitya CR, Judijanto L, Adiwijaya S, Suryahani I, Murwani IA, Sopiana Y, Boari Y, Kartika T, Fatmah F. 2024. Green Economy: Teori, Konsep, Gagasan Penerapan Perekonomian Hijau Berbagai Bidang di Masa Depan. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. Jambi.
Rawung SS, Rumagit MCN, Supriyanto S. 2024. Buku Ajar Ekonomi Publik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. Jambi.
Septian DE, Kaswanto RL, Arifin HS. 2025. Kontribusi Jasa Lanskap Agroforestri Sebagai Usaha Peningkatan Resiliensi Ekosistem terhadap Tekanan Lingkungan. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 12(1): 85-94. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i1.62705.
Sjaf S, Kaswanto RL, Hidayat NK, Barlan ZA, Elson L, Sampean S, Gunadi H. 2021. Measuring Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Area: A Case Study of Sukamantri Village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22500/9202133896.
[UU] Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pangan.
Wati NAR, Azis JA. 2024. Strategi Pengendalian Inflasi Untuk Stabilitas Harga Melalui Kebijakan Moneter Perspektif Umer Chapra. Iqtishodiyah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam 10(2): 284-298. https://doi.org/10.55210/iqtishodiyah.v10i2.1557.
Wijaya O, Juniawan W, Widodo. 2022. Aternatif Kebijakan Ketahanan Pangan Wilayah Kabupaten Banyumas dengan Pendekatan Cluster Analysis. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(3): 133-148. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i3.32799.
Yurianto H. 2020. Analisis Kebijakan Pengendalian Inflasi DKI Jakarta. Balance: Economic, Business, Management, and Accounting Journal 17(1): 12-33. https://doi.org/10.30651/blc.v17i1.4179.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
