PERSEPSI PELAKU USAHATANI TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DAN PROGRAM INVESTASI PUBLIK DI SEKTOR PERTANIAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v12i1.62166Keywords:
Agriculture, Investment, PublicAbstract
Public investment in the agricultural sector is expected to increase production and farmer welfare. This study aims to analyze business actors' perceptions of public investment policies and programs in the agricultural sector. The sample of respondents was 300 farmers who cultivate rice, corn, soybeans, vegetables, cocoa and palm oil commodities in five districts (Subang, Indramayu, Pacitan, North Lombok and North Luwuk). Farmers' perceptions based on Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) analysis show that the performance of production facilities, agricultural machinery and infrastructure in general must be maintained. Meanwhile, for other factors such as human resources, research and development, use of technology, financing, government policies, government and institutional assistance, facilitation and partnerships, farmer respondents have levels of interest and also performance perceptions that vary greatly between sample locations and commodity types. As an effort to optimize public investment, assistance activities by ministries, institutions, the private sector and universities for farmers are very necessary.
Downloads
References
Adrian, Widiatmaka, Munibah K, Firmansyah I. 2024. Desain Regulasi Spasial Lanskap Lahan Pertanian untuk Kemandirian Pangan Kabupaten Majalengka Hingga Tahun 2045. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2): 113–123. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.56379
Azis M, Suryana EA. 2023. Komparasi dan Implementasi Kebijakan Digitalisasi Pertanian: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10(3): 179–198. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3.51083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3.51083
Bonye SZ, Alfred K, Jasaw GS. 2012. Promoting Community-Based Extension Agents as An Alternative Approach to Formal Agricultural Extensi. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 2(1): 76–95. https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.197944?utm_source=ideas.
Elizabeth A, Nasution M. 2023. Mendorong Kinerja Investasi Urgensi Peningkatan Penggunaan Pupuk Organik Surplus Neraca Perdagangan di Tengah Ketidakpastian. Buletin APBN 8(9): 3–15.
Fatahullah, Hilmi MA. 2024. Food Estate: Ancaman Ataukah Peluang Bagi Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia?. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis (JEPA) 8(4): 1313–1326.
Hutabarat B. 2001. Investasi Publik pada Sektor Pertanian di Era Otonomi. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi 19(2): 24-37. DOI: 10.21082/fae.v19n2.2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v19n2.2001.24-37
Kaswanto RL, Aurora RM, Yusri D, Sjaf S, Barus S. 2021. Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Komoditas Unggulan Pertanian di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 19(2): 189-205. DOI: 10.21082/akp.v19n2.2021.189-205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v19n2.2021.189-205
Kementerian Pertanian. 2021. Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia Nomor 484/KPTS/RC.020/M/8/2021.
Rahayu P, Simanullang ES. 2023. Determinan Produksi dan Analisis Kelayakan Usahatani Cabai Merah: Studi Kasus Desa Tanjung Ibus Kecamatan Secanggang Kabupaten Langkat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10(3): 165–178. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3.51050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i3.51050
Rasman A, Theresia ES, Aginda MF. 2023. Analisis Implementasi Program Food Estate Sebagai Solusi Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia. Holistic: Journal of Tropical Agriculture Sciences 1(1): 36–68. DOI: 10.61511/hjtas.v1i1.2023.183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61511/hjtas.v1i1.2023.183
RedSeer. 2022. Consumer Internet in Indonesia. Redseer. Com, February, 19. https://redseer.com/reports/consumer-internet-in-indonesia/.
Rejekiningrum P, Kartiwa B. 2022. Kontribusi Pembangunan Infrastruktur Panen Air Terhadap Peningkatan Pendapatan Dan Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9(1): 37–51. DOI: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v9i1.28073
Ridhwan MM, Rezki JF, Suryahadi A, Ramayandi A. 2021. The Impact of Covid-19 Lockdowns on Household Income, Consumption, and Expectation: Evidence From High. Bank Indonesia.
Sánchez MV, Cicowiez M, Ortega A. 2022. Prioritizing Public Investment in Agriculture for Post-COVID-19 Recovery: A Sectoral Ranking for Mexico. Food Policy 109. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102251
Santosa E. 2015. Percepatan Pengembangan Food Estate untuk Meningkatkan Ketahanan dan Kemandirian Pangan Nasional. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 1(2): 80-85. DOI: 10.20957/jkebijakan.v1i2.10290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20957/jkebijakan.v1i2.10290
Septia D, Ratna F, Widyastutik. 2022. Model Bisnis Pengembangan Hilirisasi Bawang Merah. Jurnal Ilmilah Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi 8(1): 17–30.
Sjaf S, Kaswanto RL, Hidayat NK, Barlan ZA, Elson L, Sampean S, Gunadi H. 2021. Measuring Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Area: A Case Study of Sukamantri Village in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22500/9202133896
Swanson BE. 2008. Global Review of Good Agricultural Extension and Advisory Practices. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations.
Tambunan EC, Enuh K, Ubaidullah U, Tamba M. 2022. Capital Access For Micro Small Medium Enterprises. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah 10(2): 148–158. DOI: 10.46899/jeps.v10i2.375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v10i2.375
Tanjung D, Kriswantriyono A, Wulandari YP, Suharjito D, Lis YP. 2023. Agricultural Development in Reducing Rural-Urban Inequality Towards Strengthening The Economy of West Java. Jurnal Resolusi Konflik, CSR Dan Pemberdayaan 8(1): 62–76.
Widyastutik, Firdaus M., Aminah M, Panjaitan DV. 2022. Analisis Cost Benefit Pemupukan Berimbang Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Unsur Hara Optimal: Pendekatan RIA. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan 11(1), 35–55. DOI: 10.29244/jekp.11.1.2022.35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.11.1.2022.35-55
Widyastutik W, Djaenudin D, Sahara S. 2021. MSMEs Rattan Business Model in Pulang Pisau Regency in Supporting Sustainable Management of Peatland Ecosystems. Business Review and Case Studies 2(1): 36–48. DOI: 10.17358/brcs.2.1.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17358/brcs.2.1.36
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
How to Cite
