Forage Production and Nutrient Content of Different Elephant Grass Varieties Cultivated with Indigofera zollingeriana in an Intercropping System
Abstract
A proper planting system and efficient management are needed to cultivate forage effectively. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate forage production and nutrient content of different elephant grass varieties grown with Indigofera in the intercropping system and were harvested at different intervals of defoliation. The research was conducted in the dry and rainy seasons using a randomized block design with 3 factors (2x2x2) and 4 replications. The first factor was two different elephant grass varieties consisting of cv. Pakchong and Taiwan, the second factor was the planting pattern, including intercropping and monoculture, while the third factor was harvesting age, comprising 50 days and 60 days. The results showed an interaction effect between grass varieties, planting patterns, and harvesting ages. Intercropping the Pakchong varieties with Indigofera and harvesting at 60 days produced the highest forage fresh weight and DM production, ADF as well as NDF contents and yields, CP yield, and the highest carrying capacity (p<0.05) according to DM intake. When harvested at 50 days, Indigofera increased the protein content of forage, but this effect did not occur when it was harvested at 60 days. Furthermore, nutrient yields were not affected by interactions of three factors in the rainy season (p>0.05), but in the dry season, the highest ash and CP yields were produced by the Pakchong variety intercropped with Indigofera and harvesting at 60 days. The highest ADF and NDF yields were obtained from the Taiwan varieties grown in monoculture and harvested at 60 days. Based on the results, it was concluded that the two varieties of elephant grass could be cultivated with Indigofera in the intercropping system and harvesting time of 60 days will produce the highest nutrient yield and carrying capacity.
References
Abdullah, L. & Suharlina. 2010. Herbage yield and quality of two vegetative parts of indigofera at different times of first regrowth defoliation. Med. Pet. 33:44-49. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2010.33.3.169
Beever, D. E., N. Offer, & M. Gill. 2000. The Feeding Value of Grass and grass Products. In: Grass: Its Production and Utilization Ed. A. Hopkins. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd for British Grasslands Society. p. 140–195.
Bouffaud, M. L., M. A. Poirier, D. Mulle, & Y. MoënneLoccoz. 2014. Root microbiome relates to plant host evolution in maize and other Poaceae. Environ. Microbiol. 16:2804-2814. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12442
Crespo, G. & J. Alvarez. 2014. Comparison of biomass production of Pennisetum purpureum clones N fertilized. Cub. J. Agric. Sci. 46:427-433.
Ella, A. 2002. Productivity and Nutritional Value of Several Types of Grass and Feed Legumes Planted on Wet Climate in Dryland Using Inorganic Fertilizer. South Sulawesi Agricultural Technology Assessment Institute. Makassar.
Fariani, A. 2008. Development of ruminant based on posture availability and labours in Musi Rawas Regency-South Sumatera. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 3:145–157.
Ghanbari, G., M. Dahmardeh, B. A. Siahsar, & M. Ramroudi. 2010. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) - cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in the arid environment. J. Food. Agric. Environ. 8:102-108.
Dios-León, G. E. D., J. A. Ramos-Juárez, F. Izquierdo-Reyes, B. M. Joaquín-Torres, & F. Meléndez-Nava. 2022. Productive performance and nutritional value of Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 grass at different regrowth ages. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 13:1055-1066. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i4.5217
Herdiawan, I., L. Abdullah, & D. Sopandi. 2014. Forage nutritional status of Indigofera zollingeriana at various levels of drought stress treatment and pruning interval. Indones. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 19:91-103. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v19i2.1037
Kumalasari, N. R., G. P. Wicaksono, & L. Abdullah. 2017. Plant growth patterns, forage yield, and quality of Indigofera zollingeriana influenced by row spacing. Med. Pet. 40:14-19. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2017.40.1.14
Kordi, S., Z. S. Saeid, S. K. Jalil, W. Weria, & A. S. Dennis. 2020. Intercropping system and N2 fixing bacteria can increase land use efficiency and improve the essential oil quantity and quality of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 11:1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.610026
Koten, B., R. D. Soetrisno, N. Ngadiyono, & B. Soewignyo. 2013. The appearance of intercropped forage production of Arbila (Phaseolus lunatus) with inoculum rhizobium and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) on Arbila planting spacing and number of sorghum rows. Anim. Sci. 11:26-33.
Liman, A. K. Wijaya, Erwanto, Muhtarudin, C. Septianingsih, T. Asidiq, T. Nur, & K. Adhianto. 2022. Productivity and quality of Pakchong-1 hybrid grass (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum Americanum) at different harvesting ages and fertilizer levels. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 25:426-432. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2022.426.432
Lounglawan, P., W. Lounglawan, & W. Suksombat. 2014. Effect of cutting interval and cutting height on yield and chemical composition of King Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum Americanum). APCBEE Procedia 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.075
Luna, M. R., M. E. Chacon, R. J. Ramirez, P. G. Alvarez, P. P. Alvarez, P. K. Plua, & M. A. Alava. 2015. Yield and quality of two species of Pennisetum in Ecuador. Rev. Electron. Vet. 16:1-10.
Mansyur, T. Dhalika, R. Z. Islami, I. Hernawan, & U. H. Tanuwiria. 2016. Estimation of In Vitro Digestibility of Forage Sorghum Based on Crude Protein Content and Fiber Fraction. Proceedings of the Ongoing National Seminar 8. Sumedang. [July 16, 2022].
Matusso, J. M. M., J. N. Mugwe, & M. Mucheru-Muna. 2014. Potential role of cereal-legume intercropping systems in integrated soil fertility management in Sub-Saharan Africa smallholder farming systems. Res. J. Agric. Environ. Manag. 3:162-174.
Mobasser, H. R., M. R. Vazirimehr, & K. Rigi. 2014. Effect of intercropping on resources use weed management and forage quality. Intern. J. Plant. Anim. Environ. Sci. 4:706-713.
Moradi, H., M. Noori, A. Sobhkhizi, M. Fahramand, & K. Rigi. 2014. Effect of intercropping in agronomy. J. Nov. Appl. Sci. 3:315-320.
Mourino, F., K. A. Albrecht, D. M. Schaefer, & P. Berzaghi. 2003. Integrated systems. Agron. J. 95:652-659. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.6520
Ofek, M., M. Voronov-Goldman, Y. Hadar, & D. Minz. 2014. Host signature effect on plant root-associated microbiomes revealed through analyses of resident vs active communities. Environ. Microbiol. 16:2157–2167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12228
Peiretti, P. G., F. Gai, & S. Tassone. 2015. Nutritional value and fatty acid profile of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica) plant during its growth cycle. Livest. Res. Rur. Develop. 27:18-25.
Qin, A. Z., G. B. Huang, Q. Chai, A. Z. Yu, & P. Huang. 2013. Grain yield and soil respiratory response to intercropping systems on arid land. Field Crops Res. 144:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.005
Rajaii, M. & M. DahMardeh. 2014. The evaluation of corn and peanut intercropping on the efficiency of using the environmental resource and soil fertility. J. Agric. Sci. 6:99-108. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n4p99
Rengsirikul, K., Y. Ishii, K. Kangvansaichol, P. Pripanapong, P. Sripichitt, V. Punsuvon, P. Viathanosat, G. Nakamanee, & S. Tudsri. 2011. Effects of inter-cutting interval on biomass yield, growth components and chemical composition of Elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) cultivars as bioenergy crops in Thailand. Grassl. Sci. 57:135−141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2011.00220.x
Shandu, R. K. & S. B. Nathan. 2021. Effect of planting density on the yield and growth of intercropped tomatoes and peppers in Florida. HortScience. 15667:1-5.
Suharlina, D. A. Astuti, Nahrowi, A. Jayanegara, & L. Abdullah. 2016a. Nutritional evaluation of dairy goat rations containing Indigofera zollinggeriana using the in vitro rumen fermentation technique (RUSITEC). J. Dairy Sci. 11:100-105. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2016.100.105
Suharlina, D. A. Astuti, Nahrowi, A. Jayanegara, L. Abdullah. 2016b. In vitro evaluation of concentrate feed containing Indigofera zollingeriana in goat. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 41:196-203. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.41.4.196-203
Supriyatman, B. 2011. Introduction of Corn and Peanut Intercropping Technology. Agricultural Research and Development Agency. Center for Food Crops Research and Development, Bogor.
Tarigan, A., S. P. Ginting, I. I. Arief, D. A. Astuti, & L. Abdullah. 2017. Physical quality and digestibility in vitro determination of green pellet concentrate based on Indigofera zollingeriana. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 22:114-123. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v22i3.1651
Telleng, M., K. G. Wiryawan, P. D. M. H. Karti, I. G. Permana, & L. Abdullah. 2016. Forage production and nutrient composition of different sorghum varieties cultivated with indigofera in intercropping system. Med. Pet. 39:203-209. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2016.39.3.203
Tessema, Z. 2008. Effect of plant density on morphological characteristics, yield and chemical composition of Elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schum). East. Afric. J. Sci. 2:55–61. https://doi.org/10.4314/eajsci.v2i1.40365
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, & B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods of dietary fibre, neutral detergent, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wang, S. 2017. Responses of net primary productivity to phenological dynamics in the Tibetan Plateau, China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 232:235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.020
Zailan, M. Z., H. Yaakub, & S. Jusoh. 2016. Yield and nutritive value of four Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different harvesting ages. Agric. Biol. J. North. Americ. 7:213-219.
Zhuang, X., J. Gao, M. Ma, S. Fu, & G. Zhuang. 2013. Review bioactive molecules in soil ecosystems: Masters of the underground. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14:8841-8868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14058841
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.