Gas Kinetics, Rumen Characteristics, and In Vitro Degradability of Varied Levels of Dried and Fresh Cassava Leaf Top Fermented with Cassava Pulp

S. Morm, A. Lunpha, R. Pilajun, A. Cherdthong

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of different levels of dried cassava leaf top (DCT) and fresh cassava leaf top (FCT) fermented with cassava pulp (CS) on the nutritional value of silage, gas kinetics, rumen characteristics, and in vitro degradability. Dietary treatments were administered using a completely randomized design (CRD) with eight treatments and three replicate runs. The eight treatments were as follows: 1) CS fermented no additive (nA), 2) CS fermented with additives (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, urea, molasses, and sugar) (CSA), 3) 95% CSA fermented with 5% DCT (5DCT), 4) 90% CSA fermented with 10% DCT (10DCT), 5) 85% CSA fermented with 15% DCT (15DCT), 6) 95% CSA fermented with 5% FCT (5FCT), 7) 90% CSA fermented with 10% FCT (10FCT), 8) 85% CSA fermented with 15% FCT (15FCT), respectively. After 21 days of fermentation, samples of the silages were taken for chemical analysis and utilized to examine the in vitro gas production and degradability. The results show that fermented CS with DCT at 5% to 10% DM had the highest increase in CP when compared to nA or CSA (p<0.05). In vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) was significantly higher in CS fermented with 5% to 10% DCT (p<0.01), whereas CS fermented with FCT levels demonstrated lower IVDMD than the control group (p<0.01). The gas potential extent of gas production (p) and gas production from the insoluble fraction (b) did not differ significantly across treatments (p>0.05). However, the gas production from the immediately soluble fraction (a) was maximum when CS was fermented with 15DCT (p<0.05). Different treatments significantly affected the pH of the fermentation solution with the addition of 10DCT and 15DCT for 12 and 24 hours of incubation, respectively (p<0.01). After 12 hours of incubation, the population of protozoa was lowest when 5DCT and 10DCT were evaluated (p<0.01). In conclusion, CS fermented with DCT at a concentration of 5% to 10% can increase crude protein content, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), and gas production from the immediately soluble fraction while decreasing the protozoa population.

References

AOAC. 1997. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Gaithersburg, MD.
Burns, A. E., R. M. Gleadow, A. M. Zacarias, C. E. Cuambe, R. E. Miller, & T. R. Cavagnaro. 2012. Variations in the chemical composition of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaves and roots as affected by genotypic and environmental variation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60:4946-4956. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2047288
Chaiareekitwat, S., S. Latif, B. Mahayothee, P. Khuwijitjaru, M. Nagle, S. Amawan, & J. Müller. 2022. Protein composition, chlorophyll, carotenoids, and cyanide content of cassava leaves (Manihot esculenta Crantz) as influenced by cultivar, plant age, and leaf position. Food Chem. 372:131-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131173
Chauynarong, N., M. M. Bhuiyan, U. Kanto, & P. A. Iji. 2015. Variation in nutrient composition of cassava pulp and its effects on in vitro digestibility. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9:203-212. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2015.203.212
Cherdthong, A. & C. Supapong. 2019. Improving the nutritive value of cassava bioethanol waste using fermented yeast as a partial replacement of protein source in dairy calf ration. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 51:2139–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01911-4
Chirinang, P. & R. Oonsivilai. 2018. Physicochemical properties, in vitro binding capacities for lard, cholesterol, bile acids and assessment of prebiotic potential of dietary fiber from cassava pupl. Int. Food Res. J. 25:S63-S74.
Chuelong, S., T. Siriuthane, K. Polsit, S. Ittharat, U. Koatdoke, A. Cherdthong, & S. Khampa. 2011. Supplementation levels of palm oil in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture fermented cassava pulp on rumen fermentation and average daily gain in crossbred native cattle. Pak. J. Nutr. 10:1115-1120. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.1115.1120
Dagaew, G., A. Cherdthong, S. Wongtangtintharn, M. Wanapat, & C. Suntara. 2021. Manipulation of in vitro ruminal fermentation and feed digestibility as influenced by yeast waste-treated cassava pulp substitute soybean meal and different roughage to concentrate ratio. Fermentation 7:196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030196
Ghimire, A., R. Sen, & A. P. Annachhatre. 2015. Biosolid management options in cassavastarch industries of Thailand: Present practice and future possibilities. Procedia Chem. 14:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2015.03.011
Galyean, M. 1989. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research. New Mexico State University.
Kamphaya, S., H. Kumagai, W. Angthong, R. Narmseelee, & S. Bureenok. 2017. Effects of different ratios and storage periods of liquid brewer’s yeast mixed with cassava pulp on chemical composition, fermentation quality and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 30:470–478. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0218
Khuc, T. H., T. T. V. Do, S. Eva, L. Inger, & W. Ewa. 2012. Effect of adaptation strategies when feeding fresh cassava foliage on intake and physiological responses of lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0013-0
Latif, S. & J. Müller. 2015. Potential of cassava leaves in human nutrition: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 44:147-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.04.006
Leguizamón, A. J., K. M. Rompato, R. E. Hoyos, & M. C. Audisio. 2021. Nutritional evaluation of three varieties of cassava leaves (Manihot esculenta Crantz) grown in Formosa, Argentina. J. Food Compost. Anal. 101:103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103986
Mao, L., Z. Xuejuan, Z. Hanlin, L. Renlong, T. Jun, & C. Yimin. 2019. Silage fermentation and ruminal degradation of cassava foliage prepared with microbial additive. AMB Express. 9:180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0906-2
Menke, K. H. & H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development. 28:7-55.
Napasirth, V., P. Napasirth, T. Sulinthone, K. Phommachanh, & Y. Cai. 2015. Microbial population, chemical composition and silage fermentation of cassava residues. Anim. Sci. J. 86:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12362
Norrapoke, T., T. Pongjongmit, & S. Polyorach. 2022. Cassava pulp can be nutritionally improved by yeast and various crude protein levels fed to cattle. Anim. Prod. Sci. 62:333-341. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20523
Norrapoke, T., M. Wanapat, A. Cherdthong, S. Kang, K. Phesatcha, & T. Pongjongmit. 2017. Improvement of nutritive value of cassava pulp and in vitro fermentation and microbial population by urea and molasses supplementation. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 46:242-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1288630
Norrapoke, N., M. Wanapat, A. Cherdthong, S. Kang, K. Phesatcha, & T. Phongchongmit. 2016. Improvement of cassava pulp nutritive value and in vitro fermentation by urea and molasses treatment. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 44:405.
Newbold, C. J., G. D. L. Fuente, A. Belanche, E. Ramos-Morales, & N. R. McEwan. 2015. The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front. Microbiol. 6:1313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313
Oni, A. O., O. S. Sowande, O. O. Oni, R. Y. Aderinboye, P. A. Dele, V. O. Ojo, O. M. Arigbede, & C. F. I. Onwuka. 2014. Effect of additives on fermentation of cassava leaf silage and ruminal fluid of West African dwarf goats. Archivos Zootecnia. 63:449-459. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922014000300006
Ornvimol, K., K. Tomoyuki, A. Wanna, S. Tomoyuki, & N. Ramphrai. 2018. Chemical composition and nutritive values of cassava pulp for cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 89:1120–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13039
Paengkoum, P. & K. Bunnakit. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of extrusion-processed mixture of cassava pulp and urea using in vitro gas production technique. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 12:315-324.
Phengvilaysouk, A. & M. Wanapat. 2008. Study on the effect of harvesting frequency on cassava foliage for cassava hay production and its nutritive value. Livestock Research Rural Development. 20 (Suppl). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/amma1.htm. [8 May 2022].
Pilajun, R. & M. Wanapat. 2018. Chemical composition and in vitro gas production of fermented cassava pulp with different types of supplements. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 46:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1261029
Polyorach, S., M. Wanapat, & A. Cherdthong. 2014. Influence of yeast fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) and roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation and microorganisms using in vitro gas production technique. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27:36–45. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13298
Promkot, C., M. Wanapat, C. Wachirapakorn, & C. Navanukraw. 2007. Influence of sulfur on fresh cassava foliage and cassava hay incubated in rumen fluid of beef cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1424-1432. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1424
Souza, J. G., C. V. D. M. Ribeiro, & K. J. Harvatine. 2022. Meta-analysis of rumination behavior and its relationship with milk and milk fat production, rumen pH, and total-tract digestibility in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 105:2022. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20535
Sommai, S., T. Ampapon, C. Mapato, P. Totakul, B. Viennasay, M. Matra, & M. Wanapat. 2020. Replacing soybean meal with yeast-fermented cassava pulp (YFCP) on feed intake, nutrient digestibilities, rumen microorganism, fermentation, and N-balance in Thai native beef cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 52:2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02228-3
Suntara, C., A. Cherdthong, M. Wanapat, S. Uriyapongson, V. Leelavatcharamas, J. Sawaengkaew, P. Chanjula, & S. Foiklang. 2021. Isolation and characterization of yeasts from rumen fluids for potential use as additives in ruminant feeding. Vet. Sci. 8:52. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8030052
Supapong, C., A. Cherdthong, A. Seankamsorn, B. Khonkhaeng, M. Wanapat, S. Uriyapongson, N. Gunun, P. Gunun, P. Chanjula, & S. Polyorach. 2017. In vitro fermentation, digestibility and methane production as influenced by Delonix regia seed meal containing tannins and saponins. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 26:123-130. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/73890/2017
Tawida, S. & P. Supawadee. 2019. Utilization of cassava pulp and cassava wastewater for bioethanol production. RMUTP Research Journal. 13:167-175.
Tilley, J. M. A. & R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci. 18:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
Van Soest, P. J. & J. B. A. Robertson. 1985. Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods: Alaboratory Manual for Animal Science 613. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University. p.165.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, & B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wanapat, M. & A. Cherdthong. 2009. Use of real-time PCR Technique in studying rumen cellulolytic bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in Swamp buffalo. Curr. Microbiol. 58:294-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9322-6
Wanapat, M., K. Phesatcha, B. Viennasay, B. Phesatcha, T. Ampapon, & S. Kang. 2018. Strategic supplementation of cassava top silage to enhance rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy cows in the tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 50:1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1593-8
Wobeto, C., A. D. Correa, C. M. P. D. Abreu, C. D. D. Santos, & H. V. Pereira. 2007. Antinutrients in the cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaf powder at three ages of the plant. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 27:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612007000100019

Authors

S. Morm
A. Lunpha
areerat.l@ubu.ac.th (Primary Contact)
R. Pilajun
A. Cherdthong
MormS., LunphaA., PilajunR., & CherdthongA. (2023). Gas Kinetics, Rumen Characteristics, and In Vitro Degradability of Varied Levels of Dried and Fresh Cassava Leaf Top Fermented with Cassava Pulp. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 46(1), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2023.46.1.105

Article Details