Artificial Insemination in Sheep with Fresh Diluted Semen: Comparison Between Two Different Semen Extenders and Management Protocols
Abstract
Timed artificial insemination (TAI) is a very important tool for reproductive programs in small ruminants, providing synchronized inseminations and more efficient use of superior males. The objectives of this study were to investigate the viability of different breeding protocols under sub-optimal conditions and out of the breeding season, and to compare the outcome of TAI in sheep with two different semen extenders. Ewes (n=575) were subjected to estrous synchronization by intravaginal sponges containing 30 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate and PMSG. Ewes were divided into 5 groups according to the semen extender employed and to the breeding protocol: 1) egg yolk citrate AI reinforced by ram (EYC-RR); 2) Andromed AI reinforced by ram (AND-RR), where rams joined the flocks 3 hours after AI; 3) egg yolk citrate AI without ram exposition (EYC); 4) Andromed AI without ram exposition (AND). In all these groups vaginal AIs were performed 56±2 hours from sponge removal and PMSG injection; 5) natural mating (RAM) where rams were introduced 48 hours following sponge removal and PMSG injection. Pregnancy rate, parturition rate, and prolificacy were significantly higher (p<0.05) in the EYC-RR and AND-RR groups than in the EYC and AND groups. The lambing rate was not different between groups. No statistical differences were observed between breeding farms or inseminating rams. This study showed that TAI with fresh semen diluted either with egg yolk citrate or with AndroMed could be an effective and feasible tool to increase lamb production and improve genetic merits of the sheep population out of the breeding season.
References
Álvarez, M., C. A. Chamorro, M. Kaabi, L. Anel-López, J. C. Boixo, E. Anel, L. Anel, & P. de Paz. 2012. Design and “in vivo” evaluation of two adapted catheters for intrauterine transcervical insemination in sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 131:153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.03.001
Anel, L., M. Kaabi, B. Abroug, M. Alvarez, E. Anel, J. C. Boixo, L. F. De La Fuente, & P. De Paz. 2005. Factors influencing the success of vaginal and laparoscopic artificial insemination in Churra ewes: A field assay. Theriogenology 63:1235-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.001
Baril, G., P. Chemineau, Y. Cognie, Y. Guerin, B. Leboeuf, P. Orgeur, & J. C. Vallet. 1993. Manuel de formation pourl’inséminationartificielle chez les ovins et les caprins. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture, Rome.
Fabre-Nys, C., A. Chanvallon, J. Dupont, L. Lardic, D. Lomet, S. Martinet, & R. J. Scaramuzzi. 2016. The “Ram Effect”: A “Non-Classical” mechanism for inducing LH surges in sheep. PLOS ONE 11:e0158530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158530
Fleisch, A., H. Bollwein, M. Piechotta, & F. Janett. 2015. Reproductive performance of Lacaune dairy sheep exposed to artificial long days followed by natural photoperiod without and with additional progestagen treatment during the nonbreeding season. Theriogenology 83:320-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.06.031
Gonzalez-Bulnes, A., A. Menchaca, G. B. Martin, & P. Martinez-Ros. 2020. Seventy years of progestagen treatments for management of the sheep oestrous cycle: Where we are and where we should go. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 32:441-452. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD18477
Gootwine, E. 2011. Mini review: Breeding Awassi and Assaf sheep for diverse management conditions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43:1289-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9852-y
Islam, R. & M. Z. Khan. 2010. Preservation of ram semen with egg yolk citrate extender at refrigeration temperature. Indian Vet. J. 87:463-465.
Karagiannidis, A., S. Varsakeli, G. Karatzas, & C.Brozos. 2001. Effect of time of artificial insemination on fertility of progestagen and PMSG treated indigenous greek ewes, during non-breeding season. Small Rumin. Res. 39:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00170-X
Khalifa, T., A. Lymberopoulos, & E. Theodosiadou. 2013. Association of soybean-based extenders with field fertility of stored ram (Ovisaries) semen: A randomized double-blind parallel group design. Theriogenology 79:517-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.11.009
Krishnakumar, S., D. P. Whiteside, B. Elkin, & J. C. Thundathil. 2011. Evaluation of an animal protein-free semen extender for cryopreservation of epididymal sperm from North American bison (Bison bison). Theriogenology 76:252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.02.001
Layek, S. S., T. K. Mohanty, A. Kumaresan, & J. E. Parks. 2016. Cryopreservation of bull semen: Evolution from egg yolk based to soybean-based extenders. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 172:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.04.013
Martin, G. B., & T.R. Ferasyi. 2016. Clean, green, ethical (CGE) management: what research do we really need?. Int. J. Trop. Vet. Biomed. Res. 1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.21157/ijtvbr.v1i1.5066
Masoudi, R., A. ZareShahneh, A. Towhidi, H. Kohram, A. Akbarisharif, & M. Sharafi. 2017. Fertility response of artificial insemination methods in sheep with fresh and frozen-thawed semen. Cryobiology 74:77-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.11.012
O’Hara, L., J. P. Hanrahan, L. Richardson, A. Donovan, S. Fair, A. C. O. Evans, & P. Lonergan. 2010. Effect of storage duration, storage temperature, and diluent on the viability and fertility of fresh ram sperm. Theriogenology 73:541-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.009
Ozyurtlu, N., I. Kucukaslan, & Y. Cetin. 2010. Characterization of oestrous induction response, oestrous duration, fecundity and fertility in Awassi ewes during the non-breeding season utilizing both CIDR and intravaginal sponge treatments. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45:464-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01246.x
Palacín, I., J. L. Yániz, E. Fantova, M. E. Blasco, F. J. Quintín-Casorrán, E. Sevilla-Mur, & P. Santolaria. 2012. Factors affecting fertility after cervical insemination with cooled semen in meat sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 132:139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.005
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. 2013. Announces the main results for Livestock Survey. http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/site/512/default.aspx?tabID=512&lang=en&ItemID=1073&mid=3171&wversion=Staging [10 April 2017].
Paulenz, H., T. Adnoy, O. H. Fossen, & L. Soderquist. 2010. Effect on field fertility of addition of gelatine, different dilution rates and storage times of cooled ram semen after vaginal insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45:706-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01338.x
Stefanov, R. G., G. Anev, & D. V. Abadjieva. 2015. Effect of different extenders and storage periods on motility and fertility of ram sperm. Mac. Vet. Rev. 38:1-5. https://doi.org/10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.12.036
Tabbaa, M. J., M. A. Alnimer, M. Shboul, & H. H. Titi. 2008. Reproductive characteristics of Awassi ewes mated artificially or naturally to Jordanian or Syrian Awassi rams. Anim. Reprod. 5:23-29.
Talafha, A. Q. & M. M. Ababneh. 2011. Awassi sheep reproduction and milk production. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43:1319-1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9858-5
WFP and FAO. 2010. Socio Economic and Food Security Survey: West Bank and Gaza Strip, Occupied Palestinian Territory. http://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/ena/wfp232398.pdf [10 April 2017].
Zamiri , M. J. 2020. Update on semen cryopreservation in sheep and goats: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 8:01-15.
Zarkawi, M., M. R. Al-Merestani, & M. F. Wardeh. 1999. Induction of synchronized oestrous and early pregnancy diagnosis in Syrian Awassi ewes, outside the breeding season. Small Rumin. Res. 33:99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00007-3
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Article Details
