The Regional Analysis of Beef Cattle Farm Development in Semarang Regency
Abstract
One of the reasons for the low production and productivity of beef cattle in Indonesia is that information on the allocation of livestock areas development is not yet clear. This study aimed to determine the priority areas for developing beef cattle farm in Semarang Regency based on the concept of sustainability. Sustainability was analyzed through the determination of leading commodities (analysis of Location Quotient and Shift Share), optimization of regional potential (analysis of carrying capacity and carrying capacity index of forage, and assessment of suitability of ecological environment of beef cattle). The process of spatial analysis used GIS software. Comprehensive planning for the development of beef cattle farm was directed in three sub-districts, namely: Bringin, Bancak, and Banyubiru. The results of the analysis showed that the three sub-districts were beef cattle base areas (LQ>1), had business growth (positive SS), and had a safe status for forage availability (>2). Other results showed that the carrying capacity for beef cattle farms in Bringin sub-district was 15,829 AU, Bancak was 8,457 AU, and Banyubiru was 6,315 AU. The land area suitable for beef cattle farm from the three priority sub-districts was 5,760.141 Ha. It can be concluded that the development of beef cattle farm in Semarang Regency is focused on three priority sub-districts, namely: Bringin, Bancak, and Banyubiru. The results of this study can be an input for local governments in determining the direction and pattern of beef cattle farm development to be more sustainable.
References
Ariningsih, E. 2014. Performance of national beef self-sufficiency policy. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi 32:137-156. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v32n2.2014.137-156
Astier, M., L. G. Barrios, Y. G. Miyoshi, Carlos. E. G. Esquivel, & O. R. Masera. 2012. Assessing the sustainability of small farmer natural resource management systems. A critical analysis of the MESMIS program 1995-2010. Ecology and Society 17:25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04910-170325
Atanga, N. L., A. C. Treydte, & R. Birner. 2013. Assessing the sustainability of different small-scale livestock production systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. Land. 2:726-755. https://doi.org/10.3390/land2040726
Berman, A. 2005. Estimates of heat stress relief needs for Holstein dairy cows. Journal Animal Science 83:1377-1384. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8361377x
BPS Kabupaten Semarang. 2018. Kabupaten Semarang dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik, Semarang.
Broom, D. M., F. A. Galindo, & E. Murgueitio. 2013. Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 280: 20132025. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2025
Ciptayasa, I. N., Hermansyah, & M. Yasin. 2016. Analisis potensi ternak kambing di Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Indonesia 2:110-115. https://doi.org/10.29303/jitpi.v2i1.20
Darnhofer, I., J. Fairweather, & H. Moller. 2010. Assessing a farm’s sustainability: insights from resilience thinking. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 8:186-198. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0480
DeLonge, M. S., A. Miles, & L. Carlisle. 2016. Investing in the transition to sustainable agriculture. Environ. Sci. Policy. 55:266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.013
Eirich, R. 2018. Beef cattle temperature humidity chart. University of Nebraska. Available at: https://bqa.unl.edu/heat-stress-resources. [28 December 2018].
Herbut, P. & S. Angrecka. 2012. Forming of temperature-humidity index (THI) and milk production of cows in the free-stall barn during the period of summer heat. Nim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 30:363-372.
Kadarsih, S. 2004. Performans sapi Bali berdasarkan ketinggian tempat di daerah transmigrasi Bengkulu. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 6:50-56.
Keesstra, S. D., J. Bouma, J. Wallinga, P. Tittonell, P. Smith, A. Cerda, L. Montararella, J. N. Quinton, Y. Pachepsky, W. H. Putten, R. D. Bardgett, S. Moolenaar, G. Mol, B. Jansen, & L. O. Fresco. 2016. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals. Soil 2:111-128. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-111-2016
Kementan. 2016. Outlook Daging Sapi. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Mulyono, J. & K. Munibah. 2016. Pendekatan location quotient dan shift share analisis dalam penentuan komoditas unggulan tanaman pangan di Kabupaten Bantul. Informatika Pertanian 25:221-230. https://doi.org/10.21082/ip.v25n2.2016.p221-230
Muta’ali, L. 2015. Teknik Analisis Regional untuk Perencanaan Wilayah, Tata Ruang, dan Lingkungan. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Geografi UGM, Yogyakarta.
Nardone, A., B. Ronchi, N. Lacetera, M. S. Ranieri, & U. Bernabucci. 2010. Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livest. Sci. 130:57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
Nuhung, I. A. 2015. Kinerja, kendala, dan strategi pencapaian swasembada daging sapi. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi 33:63-80. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v33n1.2015.63-80
Paly, B., A. Natsir, S. Rasyid, & I. M. Fahmid. 2013. Interconnectivity multi criteria for sustainable development of beef cattle. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research 2:115-121.
Parmawati, R., Mashudi, A. Budiarto, Suyadi, & A. S. Kurnianto. 2018. Developing sustainable livestock production by feed adequacy map : A case study in Pasuruan, Indonesia. Trop. Anim. Sci. J. 41:67-76. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2018.41.1.67
Pasandaran, E., Haryono, & Suherman. 2014. Memperkuat Daya Saing Produk Pertanian. Perspektif Daya Saing Wilayah. IAARD Press, Jakarta.
Rasmussen, L. V., R. Bierbaum, J. A. Oldekop, & A. Agrawal. 2017. Bridging the practitioner-researcher divide: Indicators to track environmental, economic, and sociocultural sustainability of agricultural commodity production. Glob. Environ. Change 42:33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001
Rouf, A. A., Daryanto, & A. Fariyanti. 2014. Daya saing usaha sapi potong di Indonesia: Pendekatan domestic resources cost. Wartazoa 24:97-107. https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v24i2.1053
Rusmana, N., Atmiyati, & Ridwan. 2006. Pembuatan peta kesesuaian ekologis untuk ternak ruminansia pada skala tinjau. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor. pp. 175-178.
Sabaghi, M., C. Mascle, P. Baptiste, & R. Rostamzadeh. 2016. Sustainability assessment using fuzzy-inference technique (SAFT): A methodology toward green products. Expert Syst. Appl. 56:69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.02.038
Santos, S. A., H. P. de Lima, Silvia. M. F. S. Massruha, Urbano. G. P. de Abreu, W. M. Tomas, S. M. Salis, E. L. Cardoso, M. D. de Oliveira, Marcia. T. S. Soares, A. dos Santos Jr, L. O. F. de Oliveira, D. F. Calheiros, S. M. A. Crispim, B. M. A. Soriano, C. O. G. Amancio, A. P. Nunes, & L. A. Pellegrin. 2017. A fuzzy logic-based tool to assess beef cattle ranching sustainability in complex environmental systems. Journal of Environmental Management 198:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.076
Saputra, J. I., Liman, & Y. Widodo. 2016. Analisis potensi pengembangan peternakan sapi potong di Kabupaten Pesawaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu 4:115-123.
Sarwanto, D. & E. Hendarto. 2011. Analisis kualitas air minum sapi perah rakyat di Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah. Media Peternakan 13:1-5.
Suhaema, E., Widiatmaka, & B. Tjahjono. 2014. The regional development of beef cattle based on physical and forage land suitability in Cianjur Regency. Tanah Lingkungan 16:53-60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jitl.16.2.53-60
Sumarto, S. & R. Koneri. 2016. Ekologi Hewan. Cv. Patra Media Grafindo, Bandung.
Sutanto, A. & L. Hendraningsih. 2011. Analisis keberlanjutan usaha sapi perah di Kecamatan Ngantang Kabupaten Malang. Gamma 7:1-12.
Syarifuddin, H. 2009. Indeks keberlanjutan integrasi tanaman dengan ternak (crop livestock system) di Kuamang Kuning. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan XII:41-49.
Taiwo, F. J. & O. O. Feyisara. 2017. Understanding the concept of carrying capacity and its relevance to urban and regional planning. Journal of Environmental Studies 3:1-5.
Thornton, P. K. 2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365:2853-2867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
Tongco, M. D. C. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5:147-158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
Wasike, C. B., T. M. Magothe, A. K. Kahi, & K. J. Peters. 2011. Factors that influence the efficiency of beef and dairy cattle recording system in Kenya: A SWOT-AHP analysis. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43:141-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9666-3
Yani, A., H. Suhardiyanto, R. Hasbullah, & B. P. Purwanto. 2007. Analisis dan simulasi distribusi suhu udara pada kandang sapi perah menggunakan computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Med. Pet. 30:218–228.
Yuniar, P. S., A. M. Fuah, & Widiatmaka. 2016. Carrying capacity and priority region for development of beef cattle production in South Tangerang. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan 4:64-268. https://doi.org/10.29244/jipthp.4.1.264-268
Zakiah, A. Saleh, & K. Matindas. 2017. Gaya kepemimpinan dan perilaku komunikasi GPPT dengan kapasitas kelembagaan sekolah peternakan rakyat di Kabupaten Muara Enim. Jurnal Penyuluhan 13:133-142. https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v13i2.14977
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Article Details
