The Development of Adopting Innovation on Entrepreneurship Status of Madura Cattle Farmers

R. Pambudy

Abstract

Developing of Madura cattle should be focused on the base of Madura cattle, that is able to scale up farmers’ profits. Expansion obstacle of livestock sub-sector closely related by adopting innovation. Farmers require entrepreneurship skills in responding to technology development. This research aimed to analyze factors affecting adopting innovation steps and how the adoption can be influenced in forming entrepreneurship status of Madura cattle farmers. This research was conducted in Madura Island. The data used is primary data obtained from respondents of 92 farmers of Madura cattle. The data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively using PLS-SEM analytical tools. The research showed that characteristics of entrepreneurs and communication process affected adopting innovation of Madura cattle farmers. Adopting innovation is able to be affected on shaping entrepreneurship status of Madura cattle farmers namely socially responsible entrepreneurs.

References

[BPS]. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. PDB atas harga berlaku persektor. http://aplikasi2.pertanian.go.id/pdb/rekaptahun.php

Cahyanto P. G., B. G. Sugihen, & Hadiyanto. 2008. Efektivitas komunikasi partisipatif dalam pelaksanaan prima tani di Kecamatan Sungai Kakap Kabupaten Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan. 6: 14-30.

Cheboi, S. & H. Mberia. 2014. Efficacy of interpers OD, onal communication channels in the diffusion and adoption of zero grazing technology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Sosial Sciences. 4(4): 352-368

Dahan, S. S., P. Mappigau, & S. Khaerani. 2014. Human capital and best practice management adoption of among small scale maize farmer in Bantaeng District, Indonesia. Journal of Marketing Management. 2: 81-89.

[DITJEN PKH]. Direktorat Jendral Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2017. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2017. http://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id/userfiles/File/Buku_Statistik_2017_(ebook).pdf?time=1505127443012

Ghozali, I. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Diponegoro University, Semarang.

Hadiyati, E. 2011. Kreativitas dan inovasi berpengaruh terhadap kewirausahaan usaha kecil. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 13: 8-16. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.13.1.8-16

Harinta, Y. W. 2011. Adopsi inovasi pertanian di kalangan petani di Kecamatan Gatak Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Agrin. 15: 164-174

Hartono, B. 2012. Peran daya dukung wilayah terhadap pengembangan usaha peternakan sapi madura. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. 13: 316-326

Herdiawan, G., T. A. K. Benito, & A. H. Yuli. 2014. Diskontinuitas Penerapan Inovasi Biogas oleh Peternak Sapi Perah. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. 1: 1-6

Idris, N., H. Afriani, & Fatati. 2009. Minat peternak untuk mengembangkan ternak sapi di kawasan perkebunan kelapa sawit (Studi Kasus : Kecamatan Sungai Bahar Kabupaten Muaro Jambi). Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Jambi Seri Humaniora 11:1-7.

Jan, R., I. P. Sudrana, & L. M. Kasip. 2015. Pengamatan sifat-sifat yang mempunyai nilai ekonomi tinggi pada sapi bali di Kota Mataram. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Indonesia. 1: 53–59.

Indrianingsih, K.S. 2011. Pengaruh penyuluhan terhadap keputusan petani dalam adopsi inovasi teknologi usahatani terpadu. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 29: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v29n1.2011.1-24

Listiyati, D., B. Sudjarmoko, & A. M. Hasibuan. 2013. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi adopsi benih unggul kopi di Lampung. Buletin RISTRI. 4: 165-174

Kao, D. T. 2007. Conclusion explicitness in message communication: The roles of NFC and knowledge in attitude formation. Sosial Behavior and Personalit an international journal. 35:819-826. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.6.819

Mardikanto, T. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian untuk Kegiatan Penyuluhan Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Prima Theresia Pressindo, Surakarta.

Mastuti, S. & N. N. Hidayat. 2016. Peranan tenaga kerja perempuan dalam usaha ternak sapi perah di Kabupaten Banyumas. Animal Production. 11: 40-47.

Mcelwee, G. 2006. Farmers as entrepreneurs developing competitive skills. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 11: 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946706000398

Muchtar, K., N. Purnaningsih, & D. Susanto. 2014. Komunikasi Partisipatif pada Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (SL-PTT). Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan. 12: 1-14

Mulatmi, S. N. W., B. Guntoro, B. P. Widyobroto, S. Nurtini, & A. Pertiwiningrum. 2016. Strategi peningkatan adopsi inovasi pada peternakan sapi perah rakyat di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Jawa Tengah, dan Jawa Timur. Buletin Peternakan. 40: 219-227. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v40i3.12470

Nazir, M. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Nipsih, U. W. 2010. Rentabilitas usaha ternak sapi potong di Desa Wonorejo Kecamatan Poncokusumo Kabupaten Malang. J. Ternak Tropika. 11: 48-53

Okpara, F. O. 2017. The value of creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. 3: 1-14.

Onyebinama, U. A. U. & I. C. Onyebinama. 2010. Extension education and entrepreneurship development in Nigerian agriculture. Agricultural Journal. 5: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.3923/aj.2010.63.69

Phelan, C. & R. Sharpley. 2012. Exploring entrepreneurial skills and competencies in farm tourism. The Juournal of Local Economic. 12: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094211429654

Pillis, E. D. & K. K. Reardon. 2007. The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention a cross-cultural comparison. Career Development International. 1: 382-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710756762

Rasyid, A. 2012. Metode komunikasi penyuluhan pada petani sawah. Jurnal Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi. 1: 1-15

Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations Third Edition. The Free Press, New York.

Rushendi, S. Sarwoprasdjo, & R. S. H. Mulyandari. 2016. Pengaruh saluran komunikasi interpersonal terhadap keputusan adopsi inovasi pertanian bioindustri integrasi seraiwangi–ternak di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 34: 135-144. https://doi.org/10.21082/jae.v34n2.2016.135-144

Sonbait, L. W., K. A. Santosa, & Panjono. 2011. Evaluasi program pengembangan sapi potong gaduhan melalui kelompok di Kabupaten Manokwari Papua Barat. Buletin Peternakan. 35: 208-217. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v35i3.1095

Sari, O. D., M. P. Supanggyo, & D. Padmaningrum. 2008. Penggunaan saluran komunikasi dan sikap petani tanaman hias tentang prospek bisnis Anthurium (Anthurium Sp) di Kecamatan Ngargoyoso Kabupaten Karanganyar. Agritexts. 1(24): 1-12.

Sarwono &P. Hadi. 2013. Pemberdayaan petani oleh perusahan PT. Holcim Cilacap secara konsepsional. Jurnal Inovasi Pertanian. 12: 120-131.

Saswita, I. M. U, I. N. Suparta, & I. G. Suarta. 2013. Persepsi peternak tentang peranan penyuluh dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan dan manajemen peternakan sapi di Kelompok Ternak Sapi Sekar Sari Desa Pangsan, Kecamatan Petang, Badung. Journal of Tropical Animal Science. 1: 34-44.

Shabbir, M. S., M. N. M. Shariff, & A. Shahzad. 2016. Determinants of entrepreneurial skills set in Pakistan: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science. 6: 76-86. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v6-i2/2048

Singh, S., P. D. Corner, & K. Pavlovich. 2014. Failed, not finished: A narrative approach to understanding venture failure stigmatization. Journal of Business Venturing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.005

Siswijono, S. B., V. M. A. Nurgiartiningsih, & Hermanto. 2014. Pengembangan model kelembagaan konservasi sapi Madura. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 24: 33-38.

Tumober, J. C., A. Makalew, E. K. A. H. S. Salendu, & E. M. K. Endoh. 2014. Analisis keuntungan pemeliharaan ternak sapi di Kecamatan Suluun Tareran Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal Zootek. 34: 18-26.

Authors

R. Pambudy
pambudy@hotmail.com (Primary Contact)
PambudyR. (2018). The Development of Adopting Innovation on Entrepreneurship Status of Madura Cattle Farmers. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 41(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2018.41.2.147

Article Details

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo