The Function of Saniri as a Means of Controlling Village Development

  • Elsina Titaley Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Pattimura, Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena, Kec. Teluk Ambon, Kota Ambon, 97233, Maluku, Indonesia
  • Abubakar Muhammad Nur Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah North Maluku, Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No. 100, Sasa, Kec. Ternate Sel, Kota Ternate, 97712, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Christwyn Ruusniel Alfons Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Pattimura, Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena, Kec. Teluk Ambon, Kota Ambon, 97233, Maluku, Indonesia
Keywords: overseeing function, saniri, rural development, negeri

Abstract

The saniri institution is a traditional governance body in Maluku, particularly in Central Maluku, responsible for formulating village (negeri) programs, drafting regulations, electing the village head (raja), and overseeing the negeri government’s implementation of development initiatives. Despite its long-standing role and adherence by indigenous communities, concerns have emerged regarding its effectiveness in governance oversight. This study examines the implementation of the saniri’s control function in overseeing development projects in Lumoli Negeri, West Seram Regency. Employing qualitative research methods, findings reveal that the community, as represented by key informants, expresses dissatisfaction with the saniri’s supervisory role. Many perceive that development efforts have failed to meet expectations due to the saniri’s lack of oversight, resulting in underutilized infrastructure and facilities. This study seeks to identify the underlying factors that hinder the saniri’s ability to perform its control function and explore strategies to strengthen its governance role. Enhancing the saniri institution's effectiveness is crucial to ensuring that village development initiatives are successfully implemented and fully utilized by the community.

References

Acim, S. R., & Salenussa, B. J. M. (2019). Reviewing Maluku’s local culture through multicultural education approaches. asia proceedings of social sciences. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 4(2), 99–101.

Archibong, E. P., & Antia, C. I. (2014). Structural – functionalism: its relevance to medical profession. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(5), 349–356.

Bhusan, S., Hazarika, A., & Gopal, N. (2022). Time to simplify banking supervision—an evidence‐based study on PCA Framework in India. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060271

Corputty, P., Pasalbessy, J. D., Hattu, J., & Salamor, Y. B. (2023). Criminal sentence disparity of village funds abuse in Maluku. Sasi, 29(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1155

Garner, R. T. (2019). Structural Functional Theory. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss289.pub2

Gupta, M., Dennehy, D., Parra, C. M., Mäntymäki, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Fake news believability: The effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Information and Management, 60(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103745

Hammar, R. K. R., Renjaan, H., Balubun, W. H., Silubun, S., Rahawarin, Y. F., & Rahayan, E. (2022). Catching up a local wisdom of the kei traditional law community spatial arrangements in The Kei Islands, Southeast Maluku. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 26(1), 182–189.

Izadi, A., Mohammadi, M., Nasekhian, S., & Memar, S. (2020). Structural functionalism, social sustainability and the historic environment: a role for theory in urban regeneration. Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 11(2–3), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2020.1723248

Jyoti Sharma. (2023). Structural functionalism and educational inequalities in India: A comprehensive analysis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(2), 747–750. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.2.1646

Kaihlanen, A. M., Hietapakka, L., & Heponiemi, T. (2019). Increasing cultural awareness: Qualitative study of nurses’ perceptions about cultural competence training. BMC Nursing, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0363-x

Katrini, E. (2018). Sharing culture: On definitions, values, and emergence. Sociological Review, 66(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758550

Laturette, A. I., Latupono, B., & Akyuwen, R. J. (2021). The role of customary institutions in deciding the distribution of covid-19 to the Lehitu Indigenous people of Maluku regency. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–11.

Nurhadi, I., Sumarti, T., Hadi Dharmawan, A., & S Damanhuri, D. (2022). Cultural commodification and ethical transition of tourism development: a case in osing community, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 10(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.22500/10202238564

Okafor, S. O. (2021). Functional efficiency and the elements of the political system: an evaluation of Nigerian political structure and restructuring agenda. Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi), 15(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.24815/jsu.v15i1.21988

Ponizovskiy, V., Grigoryan, L., Kühnen, U., & Boehnke, K. (2019). Social construction of the value-behavior relation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00934

Potts, R., Vella, K., Dale, A., & Sipe, N. (2016). Exploring the usefulness of structural–functional approaches to analyse governance of planning systems. Planning Theory, 15(2), 162–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214553519

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: a literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102

Ressler, R. W., Paxton, P., Velasco, K., Pivnick, L., Weiss, I., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2021). Nonprofits: A Public policy tool for the promotion of community subjective well-being. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 822–838. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab010

Shakouri, N. (2014). Qualitative research: Incredulity toward metanarrativeness. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 671–680. http://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_3_No_2_June_2014/40.pdf

Singgalen, Y. A., Nugroho, A. Y. A., Suharsono, & Nantingkaseh, A. H. (2023). Regional tourism development in pringsewu regency: perspective on community-based tourism and sustainable livelihood. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 11(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.22500/11202341256

Staubmann, H. (2021). C. Wright mills’ the sociological imagination and the construction of talcott parsons as a conservative grand theorist. American Sociologist, 52(1), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09463-z

Suharno, S., & Milwan, M. (2020). Saniri resilience in the dynamics of monocultural policy. … Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(09), 2650–2663. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132255131/lainlain/Scopus_Saniri Resilience in the Dynamics of Monocultural Policy %7B25-5-2020%7D.pdf

Titaley, E. (2015). Utilizing Sago to Reduce Poverty. OALib, 02(01), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101236

Titaley, E. (2018). Pela dan gandong culture as basic of a network formation for poverty alleviation in the village. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(3), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.53.4247

Titaley, E. (2023). Sustainable Ecotourism Development In Negeri Lumoli , Maluku-Indonesia : Sociology Studies. Khazanah Sosial, 5(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v5i1

Titaley, E., & Watloly, A. (2021). the Cultural Values of the Island’S Indigenous People. Sosiohumaniora, 23(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v23i3.28235

Tuasamu, F. D. (2018). Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Badan Saniri Negeri (Badan Permusyawaratan Desa) Di Kecamatan Salahutu, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Caraka Prabu, 1(01), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v1i01.51

Verbrugge, L. N. H., Bjarnason, G., Fagerholm, N., Magnussen, E., Mortensen, L., Olsen, E., Plieninger, T., Raymond, C. M., & Olafsson, A. S. (2022). Navigating overgrazing and cultural values through narratives and participatory mapping: a socio-cultural analysis of sheep grazing in the Faroe Islands. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2067242

Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299

Zarzycki, M., Morrison, V., Bei, E., & Seddon, D. (2023). Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Health Psychology Review, 17(2), 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2032259

Published
2025-02-06
How to Cite
TitaleyE., Muhammad NurA., & Ruusniel AlfonsC. (2025). The Function of Saniri as a Means of Controlling Village Development. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 12(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.22500/12202454325