Development of Line Intersect Method for Logging Residue Assessment of Teak
Abstract
Line intersect method (LIM) emerged as one of the effective and efficient post-harvesting assessment methods. LIM was being widely used to estimate logging residue of plantation forest in the temperate zone. This method has not been used in tropical forest plantations, including teak forests. The study was carried out to determine the best design of LIM for assessing logging residue in the teak plantation. The circular and rectangular plot was used in this study. A hundred percent logging residue inventory was carried out on each plot. Then, one and combination of two and three line intersects per plot were placed on each plot. Bias, precision and accuracy criteria were calculated in order to compare the designs. The study found that estimation of logging residue volume using LIM was biased and tended to overestimate. LIM design with two lines combination per plot was the best design for assessing logging residue of the teak plantation.
References
Affleck DLR, Gregoire TG, Valentine HT. 2005. Design unbiased estimation in line intersect sampling using segmented transects. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 12:139–154.
[BSN] Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2011. Kayu Bundar-Bagian 2: Pengukuran dan Tabel Isi. SNI 7533.2:2011. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Bate LJ, Torgersen TR, Wisdom MJ, Garton EO. 2004. Performance of sampling methods to estimate log characteristics for wildlife. Forest Ecology Management 199:83–102.
Bate LJ, Torgersen TR, Wisdom MJ, Garton EO. 2009. Biased estimation of forest log characteristics using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology Management 258:635–640.
Behjou FK, Mollabashi OG. 2013. Assessment of coarse woody debris following selective logging in Caspian forests: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Forest Science 59 (3):117–124.
Bell G, Kerr A, McNickle D, Wollons R. 1996. Accuracy of the line intersect method of post-logging sampling under orientation bias. Forest Ecology Management 84:23–28.
Bouriaud O, Stefan G, Flocea M. 2013. Predictive models of forest logging residues in Romanian spruce and beech forests. Biomass and Bioenergy 54:59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.022.
Brown JK. 1971. A planar intersect method for sampling fuel volume and surface area. Forest Science 17 (1):96–102.
Budiaman A, Komalasari P. 2012. Waste of felling and on-site production of teak squarewood of the community forest. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 18 (3):164–168.
Budiaman A, Muhtariana D, Irmawati NY. 2014. Kayu sisa penjarangan dan tebang habis hutan tanaman jati. Jurnal Hutan Tropis. 2 (1): 9–15.
Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques 3th Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
De Vries PG. 1986. Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory: A Tech-Yourself Course. Springer, Berlin.
Draper NR, Smith H. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis 2th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia. 1999. Quantification of Forest Residue and Small Dimension Logs. Forest Department Peninsular Malaysia, Terengganu State Government and Danish Corporation for Environment, Terengganu.
Ghaffariyan MR, Acuna M, Brown M. 2013. Analysing the effect of five operational factors on forest residue supply chain costs: A case study in Western Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy 59:486–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.029.
Grushecky ST, Wang J, McGill DW. 2007. Influence of site characteristics and costs of extraction and trucking on logging residue utilization in southern West Virginia. Forest Product Journal 57:63–67.
Helmisaari H-S, Hanssen KH, Jacobson S, Kukkola M, Luiro J, Saarsalmi A, Tamminen P, Tveite B. 2011. Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: Long-term impact on tree growth. Forest Ecology Management 261:1919–1927.
Jordan GJ, Ducey MJ, Gove JH. 2004. Comparing line-intersect, fixed-area, and point relascope sampling for dead and downed coarse woody material in managed northen hardwood forest. Canadian Journal Forest Research 34:1766–1775.
Keane RE, Gray K, Bacciu V. 2012. Spatial variability of wildland fuel characteristics in northern Rocky Mountain ecosystems. USDA Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-98.
Keane RE, Gary K. 2013. Comparing three sampling techniques for estimating fine woody down dead biomass. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22:1093–1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF13038.
Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ. 2005. Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:249–256.
[Kemenhut] Kementrian Kehutanan. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor 34 Tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman inventarisasi hutan menyeluruh berkala (IHMB) pada Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu pada Hutan Produksi. Jakarta: Kementerian Kehutanan.
Matangaran JR, Anggoro R. 2012. Limbah pemanenan jati di Banyuwangi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Perennial 8 (2):88–92.
Matangaran JR, Partiani T, Purnamasari DR. 2013. Faktor eksploitasi dan kuantifikasi limbah kayu dalam rangka peningkatan efisiensi pemanenan hutan alam. Jurnal Bumi Lestari 13(2):384–393.
Okello C, Pindozzi S, Faugno S, Boccia L. 2013. Bioenergy potential of agricultural and forest residue in Uganda. Biomass and Bioenergy 56:515–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.06.003.
[Presiden RI] Presiden Republik Indonesia. 2010. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2010 tentang Perusahaan Umum (Perum) Kehutanan Negara. Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2008. Keputusan Direksi Perum Perhutani Nomor 783/Kpts/DIR/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Tebang Habis Hutan Jati. Jakarta: Direktur Utama Perum Perhutani.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2011. Rencana Pengaturan Kelestarian Hutan Kelas Perusahaan Jati Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Saradan. Madiun: Perum Perhutani Unit II Jawa Timur, Madiun.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2014. Buku Statistik Perum Perhutani Tahun 2009–2013. Jakarta: Perum Perhutani.
Ringvall A, Ståhl G. 1999. Field aspects of line intersect sampling for assessing coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology Management 119:163–170.
Sikkink PG, Keane RE. 2008. A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17:363–379.
Smeets EMW, Faaij APC. 2007. Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050 An assessment of the drivers that determine the potentials. Climatic Change 81:353–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9163-x.
Smolander A, Kitunen V, Kukkola M, Tamminen P. 2013. Response of soil organic layer characteristics to logging residues in three Scots pine thinning stands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 66:51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.017.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. 2006. “Precision” and “accuracy”: two terms that neither. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 327–330.
Suwarna U, Matangaran JR, Morizon. 2013. Ciri limbah pemanenan kayu di hutan rawa gambut tropika. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 18(1):61–65.
Tiryana T, Tatsuhara S, Shiraishi N. 2011. Empirical models for estimating the stand biomass of teak plantations in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Planning 16:177–188.
Tiryana T. 2016. Simulating harvest schedule for timber management and multipurpose management in teak plantation. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 22 (1):1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7226/jtfm. 2.1.1.
Travaglini D, Bottalico F, Brundu P, Chirici G, Minari E. 2008. Sampling deadwood within Bosco della Fontana. Canopy Analysis and Dynamics of a Floodplain Forest: 59 –68.
Van Laar A, Akça A. 2007. Forest Mensuration. Springer, Dordrecht.
Van Wagner CE. 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science 14: 20–26.
Van Wagner CE. 1982. Practical of The Line Iintersect Method. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forestry Service.
Viana H, Cohen WB, Lopes D, Aranha J. 2010. Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fires power plants in Portugal. Applied Energy 87: 2551–2560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.007
Walpole RE. 1995. Pengantar Statistika Ed ke-3. Sumantri B, translator. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Waren WG , Olsen PF. 1964. A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste. Forest Science 10: 267–276.
Woldendrop G, Keenan RJ, Spencer RD. 2004. Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology Management 198: 133–148.
Woodall CW, Heath LS, and Smith JE. 2008. National inventories of down and dead woody material forest carbon stocks in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology Management 256: 221–228.
[BSN] Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2011. Kayu Bundar-Bagian 2: Pengukuran dan Tabel Isi. SNI 7533.2:2011. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Bate LJ, Torgersen TR, Wisdom MJ, Garton EO. 2004. Performance of sampling methods to estimate log characteristics for wildlife. Forest Ecology Management 199:83–102.
Bate LJ, Torgersen TR, Wisdom MJ, Garton EO. 2009. Biased estimation of forest log characteristics using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology Management 258:635–640.
Behjou FK, Mollabashi OG. 2013. Assessment of coarse woody debris following selective logging in Caspian forests: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Forest Science 59 (3):117–124.
Bell G, Kerr A, McNickle D, Wollons R. 1996. Accuracy of the line intersect method of post-logging sampling under orientation bias. Forest Ecology Management 84:23–28.
Bouriaud O, Stefan G, Flocea M. 2013. Predictive models of forest logging residues in Romanian spruce and beech forests. Biomass and Bioenergy 54:59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.022.
Brown JK. 1971. A planar intersect method for sampling fuel volume and surface area. Forest Science 17 (1):96–102.
Budiaman A, Komalasari P. 2012. Waste of felling and on-site production of teak squarewood of the community forest. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 18 (3):164–168.
Budiaman A, Muhtariana D, Irmawati NY. 2014. Kayu sisa penjarangan dan tebang habis hutan tanaman jati. Jurnal Hutan Tropis. 2 (1): 9–15.
Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques 3th Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
De Vries PG. 1986. Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory: A Tech-Yourself Course. Springer, Berlin.
Draper NR, Smith H. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis 2th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia. 1999. Quantification of Forest Residue and Small Dimension Logs. Forest Department Peninsular Malaysia, Terengganu State Government and Danish Corporation for Environment, Terengganu.
Ghaffariyan MR, Acuna M, Brown M. 2013. Analysing the effect of five operational factors on forest residue supply chain costs: A case study in Western Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy 59:486–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.029.
Grushecky ST, Wang J, McGill DW. 2007. Influence of site characteristics and costs of extraction and trucking on logging residue utilization in southern West Virginia. Forest Product Journal 57:63–67.
Helmisaari H-S, Hanssen KH, Jacobson S, Kukkola M, Luiro J, Saarsalmi A, Tamminen P, Tveite B. 2011. Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: Long-term impact on tree growth. Forest Ecology Management 261:1919–1927.
Jordan GJ, Ducey MJ, Gove JH. 2004. Comparing line-intersect, fixed-area, and point relascope sampling for dead and downed coarse woody material in managed northen hardwood forest. Canadian Journal Forest Research 34:1766–1775.
Keane RE, Gray K, Bacciu V. 2012. Spatial variability of wildland fuel characteristics in northern Rocky Mountain ecosystems. USDA Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-98.
Keane RE, Gary K. 2013. Comparing three sampling techniques for estimating fine woody down dead biomass. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22:1093–1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF13038.
Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ. 2005. Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:249–256.
[Kemenhut] Kementrian Kehutanan. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor 34 Tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman inventarisasi hutan menyeluruh berkala (IHMB) pada Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu pada Hutan Produksi. Jakarta: Kementerian Kehutanan.
Matangaran JR, Anggoro R. 2012. Limbah pemanenan jati di Banyuwangi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Perennial 8 (2):88–92.
Matangaran JR, Partiani T, Purnamasari DR. 2013. Faktor eksploitasi dan kuantifikasi limbah kayu dalam rangka peningkatan efisiensi pemanenan hutan alam. Jurnal Bumi Lestari 13(2):384–393.
Okello C, Pindozzi S, Faugno S, Boccia L. 2013. Bioenergy potential of agricultural and forest residue in Uganda. Biomass and Bioenergy 56:515–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.06.003.
[Presiden RI] Presiden Republik Indonesia. 2010. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2010 tentang Perusahaan Umum (Perum) Kehutanan Negara. Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2008. Keputusan Direksi Perum Perhutani Nomor 783/Kpts/DIR/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Tebang Habis Hutan Jati. Jakarta: Direktur Utama Perum Perhutani.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2011. Rencana Pengaturan Kelestarian Hutan Kelas Perusahaan Jati Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Saradan. Madiun: Perum Perhutani Unit II Jawa Timur, Madiun.
[Perum Perhutani] Perusahaan Umum Kehutanan Negara. 2014. Buku Statistik Perum Perhutani Tahun 2009–2013. Jakarta: Perum Perhutani.
Ringvall A, Ståhl G. 1999. Field aspects of line intersect sampling for assessing coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology Management 119:163–170.
Sikkink PG, Keane RE. 2008. A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17:363–379.
Smeets EMW, Faaij APC. 2007. Bioenergy potentials from forestry in 2050 An assessment of the drivers that determine the potentials. Climatic Change 81:353–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9163-x.
Smolander A, Kitunen V, Kukkola M, Tamminen P. 2013. Response of soil organic layer characteristics to logging residues in three Scots pine thinning stands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 66:51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.017.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. 2006. “Precision” and “accuracy”: two terms that neither. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 327–330.
Suwarna U, Matangaran JR, Morizon. 2013. Ciri limbah pemanenan kayu di hutan rawa gambut tropika. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 18(1):61–65.
Tiryana T, Tatsuhara S, Shiraishi N. 2011. Empirical models for estimating the stand biomass of teak plantations in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Planning 16:177–188.
Tiryana T. 2016. Simulating harvest schedule for timber management and multipurpose management in teak plantation. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 22 (1):1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7226/jtfm. 2.1.1.
Travaglini D, Bottalico F, Brundu P, Chirici G, Minari E. 2008. Sampling deadwood within Bosco della Fontana. Canopy Analysis and Dynamics of a Floodplain Forest: 59 –68.
Van Laar A, Akça A. 2007. Forest Mensuration. Springer, Dordrecht.
Van Wagner CE. 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science 14: 20–26.
Van Wagner CE. 1982. Practical of The Line Iintersect Method. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Canadian Forestry Service.
Viana H, Cohen WB, Lopes D, Aranha J. 2010. Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fires power plants in Portugal. Applied Energy 87: 2551–2560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.007
Walpole RE. 1995. Pengantar Statistika Ed ke-3. Sumantri B, translator. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Waren WG , Olsen PF. 1964. A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste. Forest Science 10: 267–276.
Woldendrop G, Keenan RJ, Spencer RD. 2004. Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris. Forest Ecology Management 198: 133–148.
Woodall CW, Heath LS, and Smith JE. 2008. National inventories of down and dead woody material forest carbon stocks in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology Management 256: 221–228.
Authors
AndiniS., BudiamanA., & MuhdinM. (2017). Development of Line Intersect Method for Logging Residue Assessment of Teak. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 23(2), 51-60. Retrieved from https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmht/article/view/18340
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.