Evaluasi Komposisi Elemen Lanskap Kandang Peragaan Taman Margasatwa Ragunan Berbasis Preferensi Pengunjung

  • Sholihin Nafar Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Pertanian, IPB University
  • Andi Gunawan Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Pertanian, IPB University
  • Nurhayati Program Studi Arsitektur Lanskap, Fakultas Pertanian, IPB University
Keywords: human-animal relationship, landscape elements evaluation, Ragunan Zoo, recreational landscape design, visitor preference, zoo exhibit evaluation

Abstract

The shifting of the zoo perspective, from entertainment to being more conservation-oriented has brought positive impacts to environmental conservation. However, it also brought conflict where the need in improving animal welfare contradicted the efforts in increasing visitor satisfaction. This research aimed to evaluate the landscape element of zoo exhibits based on visitor preference as an alternative way to pursue a balance between this conflict. This research was conducted in Ragunan Zoo, Indonesia from 2019 to 2022. Two phases of the questionnaire were conducted during the research. The first questionnaire with a total of 99 respondents resulted that tiger, giraffe, and elephant became the most favorite animals. In opposite, snake, crocodile, and long-tailed macaque became the least favorite animals. In addition, the favorite landscape elements of the zoo’s exhibits were trees, water features, and woods/ log piles; while the least favorite landscape elements were stones, toys (environmental enrichment), and shrubs/climber plants. An in-depth questionnaire was conducted with a total of 37 respondents to understand the preference of landscape elements for visitor satisfaction and animal welfare through exhibit design model simulation. The study found that most respondents showed a positive value on high naturalistic exhibit design for animal welfare. However, the value of high naturalistic exhibits was lower when it comes to visitor satisfaction. It indicated that the presence of trees might reduce visitor’s visibility and overall satisfaction. The result of favorite and least favorite landscape elements slightly varies compared to the first questionnaire. Trees and water features became a consistent favorite landscape element, while toys became the least favorite one. However, the result was the opposite in the shrubs/climber plants element, as in this questionnaire, this element had a positive result in the most of evidence. In the case of stone and wood, the result might vary on animal species and the total area of the zoo’s exhibit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adefalu, L.L., Omotesho, K.F., Alao, O.S. 2015. Determination of Visitor’s Preference for Wild Animal Species (A Case Study of Unilorin Zoo, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria). Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environmental. 7(1): 125-135. ISBN: 2141–1778.

Carr, N. 2016. An Analysis of Zoo Visitor’s Favourite and Least Favourite Animals. Tourism Management Perspectives. 20:70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.07.006

Fernandez, E.J., Tamborski, M.A., Pickens, S.R., Timberlake, W. 2009. Animal-visitor Interactions in the Modern Zoo: Conflicts and Interventions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 120(1-2): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.002

Rahmafitria, F., Hindayani, P. 2022. Integrasi Analisis Preferensi Visual dan Bahaya Lanskap dalam Perencanaan Wisata di Taman Hutan Raya Ir. H. Djuanda, Bandung. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 14(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v14i2.39833

Grazian, D. 2012. Where the Wild Things Aren’t: Exhibiting Nature in American Zoos. The Sociological Quarterly. 53(4):546-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01249.x

Ilhami, W.T, Gunawan, A. 2011. Persepsi dan Preferensi Warna dalam Lanskap. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia. 3(2): 73-79. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.2011.3.2.%25p

Islami, M.Z., Kaswanto, R.L. 2017. Landscape Design Process of Lakewood Nava Park BSD City Based on Smart Growth Concept. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental 9(1) p. 012035. IOP Publishing.

Kementerian Kehutanan RI. 2012. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.31/Menhut-II/2012 tentang Lembaga Konservasi. Jakarta [ID]: Kementerian Kehutanan RI.

Kisling, V.N., ed., 2000. Zoo and Aquarium History: Ancient Animal Collections to Zoological Gardens. CRC press.

Learmonth, M.J. 2019. Dilemmas for Natural Living Concepts of Zoo Animal Welfare. Animals. 9(6):318-331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060318

Lee, H.S. 2015. Measurement of Visitors' Satisfaction with Public Zoos in Korea Using Importance-Performance Analysis. Tourism management. 47:251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.006

Maxted, N. 2013. In Situ, Ex situ Conservation. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Nafar, S., Shozo, S., and Tanaka, M. 2022. The Relationship of the Zoo Exhibits Landscape Design to Animal Welfare and Visitor Satisfaction in Kyoto City Zoo [Tesis]. Kyoto: Kyoto University.

Peraturan Pemerintahan RI. 1999. Peraturan Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 tahun 1999 tentang Pengawetan Jenis Tumbuhan dan Satwa. Jakarta [ID]: Presiden Republik Indonesia.

Rose, P.E., Nash, S.M., and Riley, L.M. 2017. To Pace or Not to Pace? A Review of What Abnormal Repetitive Behavior Tells Us about Zoo Animal Management. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research. 20:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.02.007

Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B., 2018. Design Intensities in Relation to Visual Aesthetic Preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, pp.305-310.

Published
2023-10-01
How to Cite
NafarS., GunawanA., & Nurhayati. (2023). Evaluasi Komposisi Elemen Lanskap Kandang Peragaan Taman Margasatwa Ragunan Berbasis Preferensi Pengunjung. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 15(2), 70 - 76. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v15i2.42198