EVALUASI RENCANA AKSI MITIGASI DENGAN PENDEKATAN EKONOMI HIJAU DI KABUPATEN JAYAPURA
Abstrak
Pertumbuhan ekonomi di Kabupaten Jayapura bertumpu pada sektor berbasis lahan seperti pertanian, perkebunan dan kehutanan. Kondisi ini harus dikelola dalam kerangka ekonomi hijau (green economy) sehingga dapat menjadi jalan tengah antara peningkatan populasi dan penurunan sumber daya lahan. Kabupaten Jayapura memiliki luas kawasan hutan sebesar 1.225.505 ha atau 70,73% dari luas Kabupaten Jayapura. Kawasan hutan terdiri dari Hutan Lindung 661.799 ha (38,04%), Cagar Alam 8.262 ha (0,74%), Hutan Suaka Marga Satwa 160.163 ha (9,23%) dan Hutan Budidaya 395.281 ha (22,72%). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak aksi mitigasi terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Kabupaten Jayapura dan membangun strategi kebijakan bagi Kabupaten Jayapura dalam Green Growth Economy. Penelitian ini menggunakan perangkat LUMENS dalam menganalisi input-output ekonomi Kabupaten Jayapura untuk mengetahui dampak aksi mitigasi dan trade off analysis dalam pertumbuhan ekonomi, dan membangun strategi pertumbuhan ekonomi hijau di Kabupaten Jayapura. Kabupaten Jayapura dapat memanfaatkan sumberdaya hutan untuk pemerataan ekonomi, sepanjang pemerintah menjadikan sumberdaya alam sebagai penghasil devisa dan dapat mencipatakan kesejahteraan masyarakat, maka kawasan yang dapat dijadikan sumberdaya stock carbon adalah kawasan konservasi (9,70%) dan kawasan hutan lindung (38,04%). Makna dari pembangunan ekonomi hijau di Kabupaten Jayapura adalah keterlibatan masyarakat dalam proses pembangunan, menjadi investasi dalam modal sosial, sehingga pemanfaatan sumberdaya alam dalam bentuk formal maupun informal. Memberikan ruang bagi pemerintah untuk menciptakan investasi sesuai dengan fungsi kawasannya. Strategi pembangunan ekonomi hijau Kabupaten Jayapura dapat dicapai dengan dukungan kebijakan (policy making), kerjasama serta koordinasi (patnership) dan pemerataan pembangunan.
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Unduh
Referensi
BAPPENAS] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2011. Rencana Aksi Nasional Pangan dan Gizi 2011 -2015. Jakarta (ID): BAPPENAS
[BPS Kab. Jayapura] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Jayapura. 2005. Kabupaten Jayapura dalam Angka 2013. Jayapura (ID): BPS Kabupaten Jayapura.
[CIFOR] Center for International Forestry Research. 2018. CIFOR Annual Report 1997. CIFOR (ID). Bogor.Indonesia
Arifin, H.S., Wulandari, C., Pramukanto, Q., Kaswanto, R.L. 2009. Analisis Lanskap Agroforestri: Konsep, Metode, dan Pengelolaan Agroforestri Skala Lanskap dengan Study Kasus Indonesia, Filipina, Laos, Thailand, dan Vietnam. IPB Press. Bogor, Indonesia.
Dewi, S., Suyanto, S., van Noordwijk, M. 2012. Melembagakan penurunan emisi sebagai bagian perencanaan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan pada tingkat nasional dan sub nasional di Indonesia. Brief No 31. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6p.
Dewi, N.K. 2013. Identifikasi alih fungsi lahan pertanian dan kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat daerah pinggiran di Kecamatan Gunungpati Kota Semarang. J wilayah dan lingkungan. 1 (2):175-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.1.2.175-188
[GGGI] Global Green Growth Institute. 2015. Mewujudkan Pertmbuhan Ekonomi Hijau untuk Indonesia yang Sejahtera. Jakarta (ID): The Jakarta Post.
Hariyadi. 2015. Kebijakan Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Sektor Kehutanan Menyongsong RPJMN 2015-2019 di Provinsi Papua dan Provinsi Aceh. Politica. 6(2): 145-166.
[ICRAF] World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Indonesia. 2017. Land Use Planning for Multiple Environmental Services (LUMENS). Bogor (ID):ICRAF & ESP3. Indonesia.
Johana, F. 2014. Alternatif Perencanaan Penggunaan Lahan dalam Upaya Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Berbasis Lahan di Kabupaten Merangin Provinsi Jambi. Tesis. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor: Bogor.
Kartasapoetra, G. 1985. Hukum Tanah Jaminan UUPA Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah, PT. Bina Aksara. Jakarta.
Kaswanto, R.L. and Nakagoshi, N. 2014. Landscape Ecology-Based Approach for Assessing Pekarangan Condition to Preserve Protected Area in West Java. Designing Low Carbon Societies in Landscapes, in Nakagoshi, N. and A. Mabuhay, J. (eds). Tokyo: Springer Japan, pp. 289–311.
Kementerian Sekertaris Negara. 1999. Undang-Undang No. 41 tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. Jakarta (ID). Kementerian Sekretariat Negara.
Kementerian Sekretaris Negara. 2016. Undang-Undang No. 16 tahun 2016 tentang Pengesahan Paris Agreement to The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change (persetujuan paris atas konvensi kerangka kerja perserikatan bangsa-bangsa mengenai perubahan iklim. Jakarta (ID). Kementerian Sekretariat Negara.
Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review. 45(1):1-28.
Moolakkatu, S.J. 2010. “Peace Facilitation by Small States: Norway in Sri Lanka”. Cooperation and Conflict: Nordic International Studies Assosiation, Vol 40.
[PP] Peraturan Presiden. 2011. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 61 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Penurunan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca (RAN GRK). Jakarta (ID).
Pearce, D.W., Anil, M. Edward, B. 1992. Blueprint for Green Economy. London(UK): Earthscan Pub.
[UU] Undang-Undang. 2016. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengesahan Paris Agreement To The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change (Persetujuan Paris Atas Konvensi Kerangka Kerja Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Mengenai Perubahan Iklim). Jakarta (ID).
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
