JEJAK UPAYA DAN PROSPEK PENGEMBANGAN BAWANG PUTIH DI INDONESIA
Abstract
Permintaan akan bawang putih terus meningkat, namun produksi nasional belum mencukupi, dengan hampir 95% kebutuhan bawang putih dipenuhi melalui impor. Untuk mengatasi ketergantungan pada impor, strategi pengembangan bawang putih di dalam negeri menjadi sangat penting. Tulisan ini mendalami jejak dan prospek pengembangan bawang putih, menyoroti upaya yang telah dilakukan serta potensi perkembangannya di masa depan. Berdasarkan penelitian dan data terbaru, tulisan ini menggambarkan prognosa produksi dan kebutuhan konsumsi bawang putih, tantangan yang dihadapi, dan inovasi terkini dalam budidaya dan pemasaran. Analisis tentang ekspor, impor dan neraca perdagangan bawang putih juga disajikan. Dengan mempertimbangkan peluang dan tantangan yang ada, tulisan ini merangkum prospek pengembangan bawang putih dalam konteks pertumbuhan pertanian dan dinamika permintaan pasar global yang terus berubah. Fokus pada peningkatan produksi, pengadaan benih yang cukup, dan penerapan teknologi yang efisien diidentifikasi sebagai kunci untuk mencapai swasembada bawang putih. Dengan langkah-langkah yang tepat, diharapkan negara dapat mengurangi impor dan secara signifikan memperkuat ketahanan pangan di negara ini.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Asogiyan PK. 2018. Analisis Produksi dan Konsumsi Bawang Putih Nasional dalam Mencapai Swasembada Bawang Putih. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
BPS. 2020. Luas Panen dan Produksi Padi di Indonesia 2020. Hasil Kegiatan Pendataan Statistik Pertanian Tanaman Pangan Terintegrasi dengan Metode Kerangka Sampel Area. Badan Pusat Statistik
Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura. 2015. Rencana Strategis Revisi II. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
FAO. 2022. World Food and Agriculture–Statistical Yearbook 2022. In World Food and Agriculture Statistical Yearbook 2022. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2211en.
Feryanto, Muflikh YN, Rosiana N, Herawati D. 2022. Upaya Mengurangi Ketergantungan Impor Bawang Putih. Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika 4(2): 257-261.
Hadianto W, Ariska N, Husen M. 2019. Sistem Olah Tanah terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tanaman Jagung (Zea mays L.). Jurnal Agrotek Lestari 5(1): 39–47.
Immanuella BDU, Tinaprilla N. 2023. Analisis Efisiensi Tataniaga Bawang Merah di Kecamatan Wanasari Kabupaten Brebes Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i1.34845.
Indrayani NKA, Swara IWY. 2014. Pengaruh Konsumsi, Produksi, Kurs Dollar AS dan PDB Pertanian terhadap Impor Bawang Putih Indonesia. E-Jurnal EP Unud 3(5): 209–218.
Kiloes AM, Hardiyanto N. 2020. Kelayakan Usahatani Bawang Putih di Berbagai Tingkat Harga Output . Jurnal Hortikultura 29(2): 231. https://doi.org/10.21082/jhort.v29n2.2019.p231-240.
Meleriansyah, Iskandar S., Kurniawan R. 2014. Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Volume Impor dan Produksi Bawang Putih di Indonesia. Societa 3(2): 95–102.
Najafabadi MM, Peyvast G, Asil MH, Olfati JA, Rabiee M. 2012. Mulching effects on the yield and quality of garlic as second crop in rice fields. International Journal of Plant Production 6(3): 1735–8043. www.SID.ir
Noviaranti SP, Zainuddin A. 2022. Seberapa Elastis Permintaan Bawang Putih Indonesia? Sebuah Analisis Regresi Linier Berganda. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 7(3).
Pusdatin. 2020. Outlook Bawang Putih. Komoditas Pertanian Subsektor Hortikultura. Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia
Sakinah P, Jakfar F. 2019. Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Volume Impor Bawang Putih di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pertanian Unsyiah 4(3): 40–46.
Shafa A, Risnanti Q, Fauzan A, Firmansyah, R. 2023. Analisis Perkembangan Produk Impor Bawang Putih Dari China Ke Indonesia. Study & Management Research 20(1): 22–32.
Sayaka B, Saputra YH, Swastika DKS. 2021. Realisasi Kebijakan Wajib Tanam Bagi Importir dan Dampaknya Terhadap Peningkatan Produksi Bawang Putih Nasional. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 19(1): 45. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v19n1.2021.45-67.
Septiana B, Kusnadi N, Fariyanti A. 2022. Daya Saing Bawang Putih di Indonesia. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia 10(1): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2022.10.1.40-52.
Shofiyah A, Sugiarti T. 2020. Tren Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Volume Impor Bawang Putih di Indonesia. Agriscience 1(1): 151–165. http://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/agriscience.
United Nation. 2021. Download Trade Data. UN COMTRADE: International Trade Statistics. United Nations.
Waryanto B, Agustina T, Tjiptodharmono D. 2019. Analysis of farming efficiency and smart farming system development in supporting garlic self-sufficiency: A concept. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 335(1): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/335/1/012006.
Yin RK. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press
Yovirizka IU, Haryanto T. 2020. Implikasi Kebijakan Perdagangan ACFTA pada Bawang Putih Impor di Indonesia: Model Permintaan Impor. Media Trend 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v15i2.6984.
Copyright (c) 2024 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
