PERAN PEMIMPIN DALAM KEBERHASILAN PROGRAM KAMPUNG WISATA TEMATIK MULYAHARJA
Abstract
Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village is one of the tourist villages that experienced an increase in visits when the Covid-19 pandemic hit. The village is managed by the local community who gather in the Tourism Mobilization Group (Kompepar). This research aims to analyze the role of the chairman of Kompepar in the management of the Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village in Bogor City, West Java Province. This research used a quantitative approach that examines the relationship between leadership roles and the success of the Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village Program. Data collection was carried out using a survey method using a questionnaire, followed by in-depth interviews as supporting data. In this research, a Spearman correlation test was also carried out to see the relationship between the role of leadership and the success of the Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village Program. The results of this research show that the leadership role that is related to the success of the Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village program is the role of the leader as a facilitator. It can be concluded that the higher the leader facilitates the needs of its members, the higher the success rate of the Mulyaharja Thematic Tourism Village Program.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Adrian A, Widiatmaka W, Munibah K, Firmansyah I. 2024. Desain Regulasi Spasial Lanskap Lahan Pertanian untuk Kemandirian Pangan Kabupaten Majalengka hingga Tahun 2045. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 11(2): 113-123. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v11i2.56379
Al Arafi A, Jamal M, Surya I. 2022. Peran Kepala Desa dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata di Desa Luan Kecamatan Muara Samu Kabupaten Paser. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 10(02): 77-86.
Amanda O. 2022. Peran Kepemimpinan pada Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Desa Kadudampit, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora 7(2): 55-62.
Antlov H. 2003. Negara dalam Desa: Patronase Kepemimpinan Lokal. Lappera Pustaka Utama. Yogyakarta.
Arifin HS, Munandar A, Nurhayati HSA, Kaswanto RL. 2009. Potensi Kegiatan Agrowisata di Perdesaan (Buku Seri IV: Manajemen Lanskap Perdesaan bagi Kelestarian dan Kesejahteraan Lingkungan). Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
Azikin A, Fewidarto PD. 2023. Model Pengembangan Desa Wisata di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 10 (1): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v10i1.34835.
Ekayani M, Nuva, Yasmin RK, Shaffitri LR, Idris BT. 2014. Taman Nasional untuk Siapa? Tantangan Membangun Wisata Alam berbasis Masyarakat di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 1(1): 46-52.
Herliana M, Kolopaking LM, Hakim L. 2021. Gaya Kepemimpinan Ketua Kelompok Sadar Wisata dan Keberhasilan Desa Wisata (Kasus: Kampung Wisata Batik Giriloyo, Desa Wisata Wukirsari, Kecamatan Imogiri, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Sains dan Pengembangan Masyarakat 5(4): 547–562. https://doi.org/10.2 9244/jskpm.v5i4.862
Kemenparekraf. 2023. Jejaring Desa Wisata Jawa Barat. https://jadesta. kemenparekraf.go.id/sebaran.
Mufidah T, Ahmadi D. 2023. Hubungan antara Iklim Komunikasi Organisasi dengan Motivasi Kerja Karyawan. Person: Perspectives In Communication 1(1): 19-27.
Ningrum NAP, Pramonojati TA. 2019. Pengaruh Penggunaan Aplikasi Whatsapp terhadap Efektivitas Komunikasi Organisasi di Lingkungan Pegawai Dinas Pariwisata DIY. E-Proceedings of Management 6(1).
Nurysyifa F, Kaswanto RL. 2021. Kelembagaan Program Citarum Harum dalam Pengelolaan Sub DAS Cirasea, Citarum Hulu. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 8(3): 121-135. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i3.28064
Pertiwi N, Atmaja HE. 2021. Peran Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen Perubahan di Organisasi. Literature Review. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis (EK dan BI) 4(2): 576-581.
Rahmafitria F, Kaswanto RL. 2024. The Role of Eco-attraction in the Intention to Conduct Low-Carbon Actions: A Study of Visitor Behavior in Urban Forests. International Journal of Tourism Cities 10(3): 881-904. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-07-2023-0138
Sari NN, Barlan ZA. 2019. Pengaruh Peran Pemimpin Lokal terhadap Tingkat Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam KUBE Caraka Putra. Jurnal Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat (SKPM) 3(3).
Siwalette JD. 2005. Peran Tokoh Adat dalam Perubahan Struktur Pemerintahan Desa (Studi Kasus di Desa Allang Pulau Ambon, Kecamatan Leihitu, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah, Provinsi Maluku). Tesis. Program Studi Sosiologi Pedesaan. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor
Sugiyono. 2022. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta. Bandung
Sulaeman ES, Murti B, Waryana W. 2015. Peran Kepemimpinan, Modal Sosial, Akses Informasi serta Petugas dan Fasilitator Kesehatan dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan. Jurnal Kesmas 9(4): 353-361.
Suranny LE. 2020. Pengembangan Potensi Desa Wisata dalam Rangka Peningkatan Ekonomi Perdesaan di Kabupaten Wonogiri. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan 5(1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.32630/sukowati.v5i1.212.
Wahyuningsih E, Noer S, Yunas N. 2021. Inovasi Pembangunan Desa Melalui Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Catalytic Collaboration: Belajar dari Keberhasilan Pengelolaan Taman Ghanjaran di Desa Ketapanrame, Mojokerto. Matra Pembaruan 5(2): https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.5.2.2021.141-152
Wirdayanti A, Asri A, Anggono BD, Hartoyo DR, Indarti E, Gautama H, S EH, Harefa K, Minsia M, Rumayar M, et al. 2021. Pedoman Desa Wisata (Edisi II). Kementerian Koordinasi Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi. https://jadesta.kemenparekraf.go.id/getdata/file/Buku-Membangun-Desa.pdf. [diunduh 2023 Nov 12].
Copyright (c) 2024 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
