PENINGKATAN PENGETAHUAN PETANI DALAM PEMBUATAN MIKROORGANISME LOKAL DI DESA BULOTALANGI
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Bulotalangi Village has great potential in utilizing banana stump waste to produce Local Microorganisms (MOL), which are important organic decomposers in agriculture. The study aims to increase the knowledge of Bulotalangi Village farmers about making MOL from banana stumps through counseling activities. Extension involved 30 farmers, with pretest, lecture, demonstration, question and answer, and posttest methods. The results showed an increase in farmers' knowledge on various aspects of MOL, such as understanding, benefits, composition, how to make, how to use, and how to store. The average initial knowledge of 36.48% increased to 94.44% after counseling, with the highest increase in knowledge of MOL composition by 63.34%. The increase reflects the effectiveness of extension in deepening farmers' understanding. This increased knowledge is expected to enable farmers to utilize local resources more effectively, support sustainable agricultural practices, and address the underutilization of banana stump in Bulotalangi Village. This can encourage village government policies to focus on banana stumps MOL to enhance the welfare of farmers and rural communities through home yard utilization.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Abdullah S, Wunawarsih IA, Purwanti RE, Batoa H, Lasinta M, Jayadisastra Y, Yora M, Nelvi Y, Taufik Y. 2021. Pengantar Penyuluhan Pertanian. Eureke Media Aksara. Purbalingga.
Adriyani FY. 2021. Desain Penyelenggaraan Penyuluhan Mendukung Program Kawasan Pertanian Sejahtera (Sapira) di Kabupaten Pringsewu Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 8(2): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v8i2.28040.
Arifin HS, Munandar A, Nurhayati HSA, Kaswanto RL. 2009. Pemanfaatan Pekarangan di Perdesaan (Buku Seri II: Manajemen Lanskap Perdesaaan bagi Kelestarian dan Kesejahteraan Lingkungan). Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Arifin HS, Munandar A, Schultin KG, Kaswanto RL. 2012. The Role and Impacts of Small-Scale, Homestead Agro-forestry Systems ("Pekarangan") on Household Prosperity: An Analysis of Agro-ecological Zones of Java, Indonesia. International Journal of AgriScience 2(10): 896-914.
Arifin HS, Nurhayati HSA, Kaswanto RL, Budiadi, Irwan SNR, Faisal B, Dahlan MZ, Nadhiroh SR, Wahyuni TS, Ali MS. 2021. Landscape Management Strategy of Pekarangan to Increase Community Immunity during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Java Indonesia–Inductive Research. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 918(1):012029. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/918/1/012029.
Budiman VP, Nurhayati HSA, Arifin HS, Astawan M, Kaswanto RL. 2013. Optimalisasi Fungsi Pekarangan Melalui Program Percepatan Penganekaragaman Konsumsi Pangan (P2KP) di Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat. Prosiding Lokakarya Nasional dan Seminar FKPTPI, Bogor, 2-4.
Filqisthi TA, Kaswanto RL. 2017. Carbon Stock and Plants Biodiversity of Pekarangan in Cisadane Watershed West Java. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 54(1): 012024. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012024.
Kaswanto RL, Filqisthi TA, Choliq MBS. 2017. Revitalisasi Pekarangan Lanskap Perdesaan sebagai Penyedia Jasa Lanskap untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia 8(1): 50-60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v8i1.17638.
Kesumaningwati R. 2015. Penggunaan Mol Bonggol Pisang (Musa paradisiaca) sebagai Dekomposer untuk Pengomposan Tandan Kosong Kelapa Sawit. Ziraa’ah Majalah Ilmiah Pertanian 40(1):40–45.
Meilani SS, Susyani NE. 2021. Pemanfaatan Kembali Limbah Batang Pisang Menjadi Kompos. Agroindustrial Technol Journal 5(2): 13-26.
Putri EIKIK, Dharmawan AH, Pramudita D. 2018. Analisis Kelembagaan dan Peran Stakeholders dalam Perubahan Struktur Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Sawit di Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4(2): 96-111.
Rakhmawati R. 2019. Pemanfaatan Bonggol Pisang menjadi Stick Nugget untuk Peningkatan Gizi Masyarakat Desa Soket Laok Tragah Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pangabdhi 5(1):44-50.
Santosa E. 2015. Pengembangan Tanaman Iles-Iles Tumpangsari untuk Kesejahteraan Petani dan Kemandirian Industri Pangan Nasional. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 1(2): 73-79. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jkebijakan/article/view/10288.
Teng HMBA. 2017. Filsafat Kebudayaan Dan Sastra (Dalam Perspektif Sejarah). Jurnal Ilmu Budaya 5(1):69-75.
Warnaen A. 2021. Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian: Suatu Pendekatan Penyuluhan Pertanian Berbasis Modal Sosial pada Masyarakat Tengger. Tohar Medi. Makassar.
Copyright (c) 2024 RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
