Publication Ethics Statement
The ethics code for scientific publication in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia (JAI) is applied to establish ethical principles in all manuscripts submitted and published in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia. It is important to prevent misconceptions and conflicts. This principle states guidelines on publication ethics in this journal.
Ethical Guidelines in Journal Publications
Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia publishes articles in aquaculture science and technology and has never been published yet. The articles may include both marine and freshwater aquaculture and also related fields in aquaculture, such as aquaculture engineering, in-farm, and off-farm aquaculture.
Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia is a peer-reviewed journal in the publication of a manuscript creating a comprehensive and recognized relation of knowledge about aquaculture science and technology. The submitted manuscript in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia is required to state the quality of the author's work, research method, and institutions. Thus, it is important to build standards in ethical principle and behavior for all parties involved in the publication: authors, editors, sustainable partners (reviewer), publishers, and journal sponsors.
The Department of Aquaculture of IPB University and Indonesian Society of Scientific Aquaculture (ISSA), as the Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia publisher, take full duties of custody in the publishing process and we notice our ethical principles and responsibility. We also state that advertising, reprint, and other commercial revenue do not impact the editorial decision.
Originality. Submitted manuscripts are the original work from the research result and presented the objectives of the study. The data presented in the manuscript must be authentic based on the result, despite the data fabrication. Any unreliable pieces of information, data fabrication suspicion, and not compliance to the ethics publication will not be accepted and cannot be published in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia.
Data Access. Authors may be asked to provide raw data related to editorial requirements in the publication process and are encouraged to provide data that is accessible to the public. If possible, and must be prepared in storing the data by the period after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism Check. The authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is their original work. When authors use other's works or statements, this is counted to be cited properly, both in the body text and in the reference list. Plagiarism can appear in any stage of the study, i.e. planning, research, manuscript writing, and even publication. Plagiarism in any form indicates illegal publication attitude and it is strongly inadmissible.
The Identical Publication. The author must not publish manuscripts that the same research result and substances more than one journal or another publication. Submitting the same article to more than one journal is unethical behavior in the publication and is not acceptable. Authors and editors of the journal must agree to consider the secondary publication, which must be similarly interpreted and explained with the primary manuscript. The primary manuscript must be properly cited in the secondary publication.
Source Recognition. An appropriate acknowledgment of other's work or writing must the work/writing of others must always be given. The author must include the author's name from the manuscript cited from the published article. Any personal information, e.g. conversation, correspondence, or discussions with third parties, does not have to be reported/written explicitly, only written permission from the source.
Article Compilers/authors (Authors or co-authors). Authorship must be limited to those who have a significant contribution, such as conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported results, and writing. Those who have significant contributions must be registered as co-authors. If other parties have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research, they must be listed and acknowledged as contributors. The author must ensure and approve the suitability of the final manuscript with the co-authors before being submitted for publication.
Fundamental Errors in Published Articles. When the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the Jurnal Akuakukultur Indonesia published manuscript, the author should notify the journal editor or editorial board to retract the article and revise it.
EDITORIAL BOARD DUTIES
Publication Decision. The editorial team of the Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia is responsible for deciding which manuscript will be published in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia. Continual reviewers work strictly with the editorial board to decide which manuscripts are eligible for publication in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia.
Justice in Publication. The editorial board and partner reviewers evaluate the manuscript for their intellectual substances regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, relatives, religious believes, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author.
Confidentiality. The Editor Board must not uncover the author's confidentiality or any information submitted in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia. The editorial board did not state the names and institutions of origin of all authors to sustainable partners reviewer during the manuscript review process to ensure the blind-review process.
Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. The editorial board must not use the unpublished manuscript in their research without the author's written permission. Specific information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal interest. The editors must excuse themselves (i.e. ask the co-editor, editor's association to review) from considering a manuscript that has a conflict of interest due to competition, collaboration, or other relationships with one of the authors, affiliates, or institutions. If required, other appropriate actions must be taken in addressing this.
Engagement and Cooperation in Research. The editorial board will take responsive steps when there is an ethics complaint in the manuscript published. These steps generally include not only contacting the author of the article and giving consideration to the complaint in question or complaint made, but also including further communication with relevant agencies and research bodies, repairs to publications, and relevant actions related to the complaint. Each reported act of unethical behavior must be found, even it was years after the publication.
Contribution to the Decision of the Editorial Board. Peer reviews assist the editor make decisions in decision making whether the manuscript is accepted or rejected. Peer-reviewed is a method in conducting a blinded review process or evaluation of relevant articles in their field expertise. Blinded-review means the reviewer team will not be informed about the author's identity and institution to avoid conflicts of interest and improve both reviewer and author’s integrity. Each paper is reviewed at least by two reviewers using track change in the manuscript. All reviewers' comments and suggestions were written directly on the manuscript to help the editor and author team to communicate the review results.
Punctuality. The review process in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia generally takes 1-4 months. When the review process takes longer because of certain reasons, the editorial team will contact the author. Adding the administration process, manuscript review, manuscript revision, manuscript translation, manuscript improvement, and the publication may be conducted within six months.
Confidentiality. Each submitted manuscript must be treated as a confidential document. It is not allowed to discuss or show with other parties without written authorized permission by the editorial board.
Objectiveness. Reviewers must review the manuscript objectively. Any personal critics are not accepted. A clear supporting opinion or argument must be stated to support the manuscript's improvement.
Reference acknowledgment. The reviewer should identify a related study that will be published that is plagiarism-free. Each statement in the discussion must be observed, explored, or the opinion previously reported must be following and strengthened by the relevant citation. Reviewers must provide an understanding of the editor regarding substantial similarities and overlap with the manuscript that has been reviewed before it is published or with which based on their knowledge.
Information Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Reviewers are not permitted to utilize any material in a manuscript that is not published in Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia in their research without the author's written permission. Specific information or ideas obtained during the peer-review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal interest. Reviewers must consider the article in the review that there is no conflict of interest appeared from the relationships with one of the authors, the company, or the institution of the manuscript.