Potensi Pembayaran Jasa Lingkungan Hutan Mangrove di Kecamatan Jailolo Kabupaten Halmahera Barat

  • Sukarmin Idrus
  • Ahyar Ismail
  • Meti Ekayani
Keywords: Jailolo, mangrove, payment for environmental services, provider, willingness to accept

Abstract

Payment for environmental services (PES) to mangrove forest is judged appropriate for applied in Jailolo Sub-district of West Halmahera District as a protection of mangrove ecosystems. This is due to the high utilization of mangrove environment services. If not managed properly can potentially threaten the preservation of mangrove forests. Benefits that have been perceived by the public such as a water source, pond, travel, as well as the protection of coastal areas. These benefits must be preserved for the future availability of environmental services namely through the payment of the services already provided the commonly named as payment for environmental services (PES). PES is also very supported by West Halmahera District Regulation No. 4 of 2012 year and constitution No. 32 of 2009 year about the protection and environmental management. Basically, PES is a scheme that aims to restore and protect the availability of goods and environmental services sustainable. Therefore, PES initiation for mangrove forest economy preservation in Jailolo Sub-district needs to be studied. This research aims to: 1) Identify environmental services of mangrove forest ecosystems that are potential for PES; 2) Examines the perceptions of the public service providers (providers) towards the implementation of the plan; and 3) How much willingness to accept (WTA) community as a providers of environmental services (providers) if PES is applied. The research results showed that the service potentially initiated PES are sea-water intrusion regulating service and the cultural service of mangrove tourism. For perception and public participation, environmental service providers about the mangrove environment services were judged to be sufficient for determining PES plan assignment, where communities want to participate if the maintenance costs were IDR3.350,00/trees/year

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sukarmin Idrus
Departemen Ekonomi Sumber Daya dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680
Ahyar Ismail
Departemen Ekonomi Sumber Daya dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680
Meti Ekayani
Departemen Ekonomi Sumber Daya dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680

References

[BPDAS] Badan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, Ake Malamo. 2015. Laporan Hasil Survey Evaluasi Dampak Kegiatan RHL Tahun 2010-2014. Maluku Utara.

Ekayani M, Nuva. 2015. Menggagas Pembayaran Jasa Lingkugan dalam Wisata Alam: Pembangunan Pertanian yang Berorientasi pada Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Rakyat; Oranye Book 6. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.

Ekayani M, Nuva, Yasmin R, Sinaga F, Maaruf LOM. 2014a. Wisata Alam Taman Nasional Halimun Salak: solusi kepentingan ekologi dan ekonomi. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 19(1): 29-37.

Ekayani M, Nuva, Yasmin R, Saffitri LR, Bahroin I. 2014b. Taman Nasional Untuk Siapa? Tantangan Membangun wisata Alam Berbasis Masyarakat di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 1(1): 46-52.

[ESCAP] United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 2009. Kebijakan sosial ekonomi inovatif untuk meningkatkan kinerja lingkungan: Imbal jasa lingkungan. [Internet]. [diunduh 2014 Jun 12]. Tersedia pada: http// www.unescap.org/esd dan www.greengrowth.org.

Fauzi A. 2014. Valuasi Ekonomi dan Penilaian Kerusakan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.

Gunarto. 2004. Konservasi Mangrove Sebagai Pendukung Sumber Hayati Perikanan Pantai. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 23(1): 15-21.

Hanley N, Spash CL. 1993. Cost Benefit Analysis and The Environment. Departement of Economics University of Stirling Scotland.

Indrayanti DM, Fahrudin A, Setiobudiandi I. 2015. Penilaian Jasa Ekosistem Mangrove di Teluk Blanakan Kabupaten Subang. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 20(2): 91-96. http://doi.org/bq34

[KANPORABUDPAR] Kantor Pemuda, Olahraga, Kebudayaan dan Pariwisaata Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. 2015. Data Wisata. Tidak diterbitkan.

[KKMTN] Kelompok Kerja Mangrove Tingkat Nasional. 2013. Strategi Nasional Pengelolaan Ekosistem Mangrove Indonesia (buku 1). Jakarta (ID). [Internet]. [diunduh 2013 Des 27]. Tersedia pada: http://indonesia.wetlands.org

[KLH] Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup. 2012. Valuasi Ekonomi Lingkungan Pesisir dan Laut Daerah Rawan tumpahan Minyak Selat Makassar di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Laporan Akhir Deputi Bidang Pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan dan Perubahan Iklim Tahun 2012. Jakarta (ID): PT Kreasi Pola Utama.

[KLH] Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup. 2013. Media Briefing Pembayaran Jasa Lingkungan. [Internet]. [diunduh 2014 Mei 27]. Tersedia pada http://www.menlh.go.id.

Khazali M, Bengen DG, Nikijuluw VPH. 2002. Kajian Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Mangrove. Jurnal Pesisir dan Laut. 4(3): 29-42.

Kuenzer C, Tuan VQ. 2013. Assessing the ecosystem services value of can gio mangrove biosphere reserve: combining earth observation and household survey based analyses. Journal of Applied Geography. 45: 167-184. http://doi.org/bqx7

Kusmana C. 2009. Pengelolaan Sistem Mangrove Secara Terpadu. Prosiding Workshop Pengelolaan Ekosistem Mangrove di Jawa Barat. Jatinangor, 18 Agustus 2009.

Lau WWY. 2013. Beyond carbon: Conceptualizing payments for ecosystem services in blue forests on carbon and other marine and coastal ecosystem services. Journal of Ocean & Coastal Management. 83: 5-14. http://doi.org/bqx8

[MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water. Washington DC (US): World Resources Institute.

[PDAM] Perusahan Daerah Air Minum Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. 2015. Data pelanggan. Tidak diterbitkan.

Rooswiadji AT. 2012. Jasa Ekosistem dan Pembayaran Ekosistem (Air). National Coordinator for Freshwater Program, WWF Indonesia. [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 Jan 22]. Tersedia pada: http://gis.wwf.or.id/wwf/

Santoso N. 2012. Arahan Kebijakan dan Strategi Pengelolaan Kawasan Mangrove Berkelanjutan di Muara Angke Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta. [Disertasi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sobari MP, Adrianto L, Nurdiana A. 2006. Analisis Ekonomi Alternatif Pengelolaan Ekosistem Mangrove Kecamatan Barru, Kabupaten Barru. Buletin Ekonomi perikanan. VI(3): 59-80.

Siburian R, Haba J. 2015. Konservasi Mangrove dan Kesejahtraan Masyarakat. Jakarta (ID): Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Van Beukering P, Brander L, Tompkins E, McKenzie E. 2007. Valuing the Environment in Small Islands - An Environmental Economics Toolkit, ISBN 978 1 86107 5949.

Vibrianto N, Ismail A, Ekayani M. 2015. Manfaat Ekonomi dan Daya dukung Kawasan Pantai Lombang Kabupaten Sumenep Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 2(2): 152-159.

Vo QT, Kuenzer C, Vo QM, Moder F, Oppelt N. 2012. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators. 23: 431-446. http://doi.org/bqzb

Wunder S. 2005. Imbal jasa lingkungan: Apa dan bagaimana. Terbitan Tak Berkala Pusat Penelitian Kehutanan International (Center for International Forestry Research). [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 Okt 17]. Tersedia pada: http://blog.cifor.org.

Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. 2008. Talking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services program in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics. 65(4): 834-852. http://doi.org/fbgr9t

Yamane T. 1973. Statistics: An introductory analysis. New York (US): Harper & Row.

Published
2017-08-31
How to Cite
IdrusS., IsmailA., & EkayaniM. (2017). Potensi Pembayaran Jasa Lingkungan Hutan Mangrove di Kecamatan Jailolo Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 21(3), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.21.3.195

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>