The Forest Resources Information System to Support Sustainable Forest Management: Case Study Perum Perhutani

Ahsana Riska, Muhamad Buce Saleh, Hendrayanto Hendrayanto

Abstract


Forest resources information system aims to provide accurate and complete information periodically to support effective and efficient decision-making process. Perum Perhutani is the oldest state-owned enterprise for forestry in Indonesia. They have been developed sustainable forest management include the information system. Although forest resources information system already exists, forest quality decreases time by time. This research study aims to improve the effectiveness of forest resources information system in Perum Perhutani related to forest resources management. This study focused the observation on 1) mechanism and supporting variables of forest resources information system and 2) influence of forest resources information system on the decision-making process. Mechanism and supporting variables of forest resources information system show how is forest resources information system been working to support the decision-making process. The research was conducted by reviewing literature and depth interviewing with key informants. The results showed that the current forest resources information system could not support sustainable forest management in Perum Perhutani. This information system has weakness in data and information, procedures, technology, and user. Decision-making process highly adopts technocratic paradigm, centralized, and technically dominated by decision-maker preferences which give direct affect on information management at the site level. Forest management unit as a manager at the site level become information provider but have no authority to use information to decide management

Keywords:

Keywords


forest resources information system; SISDH; decision making; Perum Perhutani

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agourram H. 2009. Defining information system success in Germany. International Journal of Information Management 29:129−137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.05.007.

Arias JM, Solana JM. 2013. Information system supported organizational learning as a competitive advantage. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 6(3):702−708. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.555.

Athanasiadis A, Areopoulou Z. 2013. A web information systems application of forest legislation: the case of Greek Forest Principles. Procedia Technology 8:292−299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11. 039.

Atrishchenko OA. 2013. Forest stand and growth forecast models. Proceeding of BSTU 2013(1):3−5.

Baligh HH. 2006. Organization Structures: Theory and Design, Analysis and Prescription. New York: Springer.

Beder S. 2006. Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. New South Wales: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.

Ben-Ner A. 2013. Preferences and organization structure: towards behavioral economics micro-foundation of organizational analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics 46:87−96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.003.

Buckingham RA, Hirschheim RA, Land FF, Tully CJ. 1987. Information Systems Education : Recommendation and Implementation. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Bungin B. 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif: Pengalaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Brown CT. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics. 60:231−246. https://doi.org/10. 2307/3146184.

Cali A, Calvanese D, De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M. 2004. Data integration under integity constraints. Information Systems 29:147−163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4379(03)00050-4.

[CEPI] Confederation of European Paper Industries. 2006. A Comparison of the Forest Stewardship Council and the Programme for Endorsement of Forest Certification. Brussel: CEPI.

Chanopas A, Krairit D, Khang DB. 2006. Managing information technology infrastructure: A new flexibility framework. Management Research News 29(10):632–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/014091706107 12335.

Cheung L, Austin K, Utami A, Bangoura J, Stolle F. 2014. Building National Forest Land Use Information Systems: Lesson from Cameroon, Indonesia and Peru. Available on: http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/land-use-infomation_systems_working_paper.pdf. [October 2015].

Creswell JW. 2012. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Fawaid A, penerjemah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DeLone WH, McLean ER. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9−30.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 1994. Reading in sustainable forest management. Available on: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/T0843e/T0843e00.pdf [August 10, 2016].

Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Gajah Mada. 2014. Laporan Akhir Ekstensifikasi Model Kelola Informasi SDH Hutan di Tingkat KPH. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Franklin SE. 2001. Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management. Washington D.C.: Lewis Publisher.

Frederickson JW. 1986. The strategic decision process and organizational structure. The Academy of Management Review 11:280−297.

Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O'connel C, Ray DK, West PC. 2011. Solution for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337−342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452.

Frohlich N, Oppenheimer J. 2006. Skating on thin ice: cracks in the public choice foundation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3):235−266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629806064346.

Harris R. 2015. Introduction to decision making. Available on: http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook56.htm. [Juni 2016].

Haron H, Hawedi HS. 2015. Information technology capability as predictor of organizational intelligence in Libyan oil and gas company. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 10(23):220−227.

Hartono E, Li X, Na K, Simpson JT. 2010. The role of the quality of shared information in interorganizational system use. International Journal of Information Management 30:399−407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt. 2010.02.007.

Kanten P, Kanten S, Gurlek M. 2015. The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. Procedia Economics and Finance 23(2015):1358-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00523-7.

Liao C, Chuang SH, To PL. 2011. How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. Journal of Business Research 64(7):728–736. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.08.001.

Lin A. 2006. The acceptance and use of a business-to-business information system. International Journal of Information Management 26:386−400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.04.002.

Lin BW. 2007. Information technology capability and value creation: evidence from US banking industry. Technology in Society 29(1):93−106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.003.

MacDicken KG, Sola P, Hall JE, Sabogal C, Tadoum M, de Wasseige C. 2015. Global progress toward sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 352(2015):47−56. https://doi.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco. 2015.02.005.

Marchand DA, Kettinger WJ. 2011. Information orientation (IO): how effective information use drives bussiness performance. Sitemas 1:75−84.

Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan BA, Balvanera P, Law EA, Rhodes JR,

Possingham HP, Wilson KA. 2015. Review: maing decision for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation 184:229−238. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024.

O'Neill JW, Beauvais LL, Scholl RW. 2001. The use of organizational culture and structure to guide strategic behavior: an information processing perspective. The Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 2(2):131−149.

Pearlson KE, Saunders CS. 2010. Managing and Using Information Systems: A Strategic Approach. Danvers: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Perum Perhutani. 2000. Standar Prosedur Operasi Sistem Informasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Sistem Informasi Geografis dengan Pengolahan Data Elektronik. Jakarta: Direksi Perum Perhutani.

Perum Perhutani. 2010. Redesain Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan Perum

Perhutani Unit II Jawa Timur. Jakarta: Direktorat Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan Perum Perhutani.

Perum Perhutani. 2015. Profil Perusahaan 2015. https://www.dropbox.com/s/bjvo5ut094rbeki/2016-Company%20Profil.pdf?dl=0 [August 2016].

Platisa G, Balaban N. 2009. Methodological aproach to evaluation of information system functionality performances and importance of successfulness factor analysis. The International Scientific Journal of Management Information System 4(2):11−17.

Prasetyo LB. 2013. Land use, climate chane and biodiversity modelling: persepectives and application 2011, 512 pages. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 19(3):211−213. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.19.3.211

Rondeaux J. 1991. Management Information System: Emerging Tools for Integrated Forest Planning. Paper for IUFRO Symposium on Integral Forest Management Information System. Available on http://www.gembloux. ulg.ac.be/gestion-des-ressources-forestieres-et-des-milieux-naturels/wp-content/uploads/Cahiers_forestiers/CaFor10.pdf- [October 2015].

Scuck A, Green T, Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Fedorec A, Requardt A, Richards T, Mills R, Mikkola E, Päivinen R, Köhl M, San-Miguel-Ayanz J. 2007. Towards a European Forest Information Systems. Netherland: European Forest Institute.

Siham L, Hammani A, Bouignane A. 2016. Data integration as the key to building a decision support system for groundwater management: case of Saiss Aquifers, Morocco. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2−3:7−15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2016.04.003.

Turban E, Rainer KR, Potter RE. 2007. Introduction to Information System. New York: Jhon Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Varma VK, Ferguson L, Wild J. 2000. Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 128:49−55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00271-6.

Walsham G. 2009. Interpreting Information System in Organizations. Blackwell: Chichester.

Zagonari F. 2016. Using ecosystem services in decision-making to support sustainable development: critiques, model development, a case study and perspective. Science of Total Environment 548−549:25−32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.021.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN : 2087-0469

E-ISSN : 2089-2063

Creative Commons License
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


visitors since November 2016