Fermentation Profile and Nutrient Composition of Rehydrated Dry Mesquite Pod (Prosopis spp.) Silage with Increasing Moisture Levels

J. A. Granados-Niño(1) , O. I. Santana(2) , A. Reyes-González(3) , J. A. Meza-Velázquez(4) , M. J. López-Calderon(5) , P. A. Domínguez-Martínez(6) , J. A. Maldonado-Jáquez(7) , J. I. Sánchez-Duarte(8)
(1) Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Facultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia,
(2) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias,
(3) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias,
(4) Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas,
(5) Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Facultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia,
(6) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias,
(7) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias,
(8) Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Abstract

Mesquite pods are traditionally used to feed livestock in arid regions. However, they are highly susceptible to beetle and other insect spoilage, so they must be preserved as silage for use during critical periods of feed scarcity. This study aims to assess the effects of increasing moisture levels from dry ground mesquite pods on fermentation parameters and nutrient composition of the silage as a method of preservation. The treatments consisted of adding 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% water (w/w). Each treatment received four PVC mini silos under a completely randomized design. On average, each mini silo was filled with 1,325 g of ground mesquite pods for ensiling. All mini silos were stored at room temperature (17-22.5 °C) and opened after 40 days of fermentation. The treatments were compared by polynomial orthogonal contrasts. Fermentation results indicated that increasing the amount of added water reduced the pH (p = 0.003) and linearly increased lactic acid (p = 0.0002) in silage. Ammonia-N and the concentration of acetic and propionic acids had a quadratic effect (p = 0.004). Silage with 20-30% water had an intermediate pH (4.65-4.53) and lower ammonia-N levels (5.59-6.51). Losses of gas, effluent, and dry matter exhibited linear and quadratic effects (p<0.0001) as water content increased, but after the 40% water treatment, these losses increased considerably. Results of nutritive value showed that crude protein was not significantly affected by the treatments (p>0.05). However, neutral and acid detergent fiber increased both linearly (p<0.05) and quadratically (p<0.0001), while non-fiber carbohydrates decreased linearly (p = 0.007) and quadratically (p<0.0001) as the water content increased. These changes resulted in a quadratic decline in metabolizable energy (p = 0.05) and net energy for gain (p = 0.008), along with a negative linear response to dry matter digestibility. Overall, adding 20%–30% water to dry mesquite pods during silage production appears optimal for preserving mesquite pods as a feed resource for ruminants. This range allows favorable nutrient concentrations and appropriate fermentation variables, while maintaining intermediate levels of gas, effluent, and dry matter losses.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

AOAC. (1984). Association of Official Analytical Chemists (14th ed). Arlington, Virginia, 1141 p.

Andre Arcari, M. A., Martins Rodrigues, C. M. M., Tomazi, T., & dos Santos M. V. (2016). Effect of the ensiling time of hydrated ground corn on silage composition and in situ starch degradability. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 53(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v53i1p60-71

Angeles-Hernández, J. C., Santiago, E. J. F., Cardoso-Gutierrez, E., Valencia-Salazar, S. S., del Razo Rodriguez, O. E., Paz, E. A., Ku-Vera, J. C., Kebreab, E., Benaouda, M., & Garcia, G. G. (2024). The use of mesquite pods (Prosopis spp.) as an alternative to improve the productive performance and methane mitigation in small ruminants: A meta-analysis. Fermentation, 10, 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10120625

Armijo-Nájera, M. G., Moreno-Reséndez, A., Blanco-Contreras, E., Borroel-García, E. J., & Reyes-Carrillo, J. L. (2019). Vaina de mezquite (Prosopis spp.) alimento para el ganado caprino en el semidesierto. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 10(10), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i1.1728

Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R. J., Holmes, B. J., & Muck, R. E. (2018). Silage Review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 3952-3979. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837

Camboim, L. F. R., Edvan, R. L., do Nascimento, R. R., Silva, S. F., Pessoa, J. P. M., Barros, L. de S., da S. Xavier, C. B. M., Filho, F. N. P., Perazzo, A. F., Rodrigues, M. M., Biagiotti, M. M., Bezerra, L. R., & Santos, E. M. (2025) Evaluation of ground maize grain silage rehydrated with water or whey: A sustainable storage option. South African Society for Animal Science, 55(8), 398-414. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajas.v55i8.04

Canale, A., Valente, M. E., & Ciotti, A. (1984). Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1-C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35, 1178-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740351106

Carvalho-Estrada, P. A., Maia de Andrade, P. A., Paziani, S. F., Nussio, L. G., & Quecine, M. C. (2020). Rehydration of dry corn preserves the desirable bacterial community during ensiling. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 367(17), fnaa 139. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa139

Contreras-Govea, F. E., Muck, R. E., Weimer, P. J., & Hymes-Fecht, U. C. (2016). In vitro ruminal fermentation of treated alfalfa silage using ruminal inocula from high and low feed efficient lactating cows. Applied Microbiology, 121(2), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13103

Cook, R. W., Scott, C. B., & Hartmann, F. S. (2008). Short-term mesquite pod consumption by goats does not induce toxicity. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 61, 566-570. https://doi.org/10.2111/05-119.1

Coutinho, R. A., de Aguilar, P. P. C., Muniz, J. A., van Cleef, C. B. E. H., Machado Neto, R. O., & da Mata, J. I. J. (2013). Mesquite pod meal in elephant grass silage. Acta Scientiarum-Animal Science, 35(3), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i3.12506

da Silva Ferreira, F. D., Garces, B. F., Mascena, V. M., Maia, B. H., de Oliveira, P. F., da Silva, P. J. V., Lopez, A. M. H., & de Macedo A. S. A. (2021). Mesquite pods as a source of soluble carbohydrates in elephant grass silages. Boletim de Indústria Animal, 78, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.2021.v78.e1503

da Silva, H. M. R., Cabrera, J. C., Neuman, M., & Omari, O. M. (2018). Corn grain processing improves chemical composition and fermentative profile of rehydrated silage. Acta Scientiarum- Animal Science, 40(1), 42564. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.42564

Del Valle, F. R., Escobedo, M., Muñoz, M. J., Ortega, R., & Bourges, H. (1983). Chemical and nutritional studies on mesquite beans (Prosopis juliflora). Journal Food Science, 48, 914-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14929.x

Ferrareto, L. F., Fredin, S. M., & Shaver, R. D. (2015). Influence of ensiling, exogenous protease addition, and bacterial inoculation on fermentation profile, nitrogen fractions, and ruminal in vitro starch digestibility in rehydrated and high moisture corn, Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 7318-7327. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9891

Gandra, J. R., Oliveira, E. R., Gandra, E. R. de S., Takiya, C. S., de Goes, R. H. T. B., Oliveira, K. M. P., Silveira, K. A., Araki, H. M. C., Orbach, N. D., & Vasquez, D. A. (2017). Inoculation of Lactobacillus buchneri alone or with Bacillus subtilis and total losses, aerobic stability, and microbiological quality of sunflower silage. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45(1), 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1249874

García-Azpeitia, L., Montalvo-González, E., & Loza-Cornejo L. (2022). Nutritional and phytochemical characterization of leaves, flower and fruits of Prosopis laevigata. Botanical Science, 100(4), 1014-1024. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3000

INRA. (2018). INRA feeding system for ruminants (p. 640). Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-292-4

Kung, L. K., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018). Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 4020-4033. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909

Mendiburu, F. (2023). Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae

Mengistu, A. C., Tesfuhuney, W. A., Woyessa, Y. E., & Steyn, A. S. (2023). Potential distribution of selected invasive alien plants under current and future climate change scenarios in South Africa. Heliyon, 9, e19867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19867

Mombach, M. A., Pereira, D. H., do Santos, P. D., Pereira, O. G., Bolson, D. C., & Pedreira, B. C. (2018). Rehydration of dry corn grain as an alternative for conservation purposes. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 12(09), 1472-1478. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.09.PNE1155

Mombach, M. A., Pereira, D. H., do Santos, P. D., Bolson, D. C., & Pedreira, B. C. (2019). Silage of rehydrated corn grain. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 71(3), 959-966. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-9676

Montañez-Valdez, O. D., Reyes-Gutiérrez, J. A., Ley-de Coss, A., Vicente-Pérez, R., Gomez-Vásquez, A., & Guerra-Medina, C. E. (2021). Composición química y degradación ruminal de la vaina de mezquite (Prosopis spp.) a diferentes estados de madurez. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios, 8(II), e2857. https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a8nII.2857

Muck, R. E., Nadeau, E. M. G., McAllister, T. A., Contreras-Govea, F. E., Santos, M. C., & Kung Jr., L. (2018). Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 3980-4000. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839

Nunes, F. C., Gimarães, K. C., Pessoa, F. O. A., Cunha, F. P., Pereira, V. C. F de S., & Paim, T. do P. (2024). Use of bacterial inoculant in rehydrated corn grain silage. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 52(1), 2400534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2024.2400534

Parra-Gil, P. J., Baltazar-Meneses, K., Castellanos, I., Romero-Nápoles, J., Martínez-Morales, M. A., & Cid-Becerra, J. A. (2020). Preferencia y depresión de semilla de mezquite por escarabajos (Coleoptera:Bruchidae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 91, e912855. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2020.91.2855

Pinho, R. M. A., Santos, E. M., de Oliveira, J. S., de Carvhalo, G. G. P., Alves, J. P., da S. Macêdo, A. J., Pereira, G. A., Pereira, D. M., Perazzo, A. F., & de M. Zanine A. (2019). Relationship between forage neutral detergent fiber and non-fibrous carbohydrates on ruminal fermentation products and neutral detergent fiber digestibility in goats. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 32(2), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v32n2a06

Rooke, J. A., & Hatfield, R. D. (2003). Biochemistry of ensiling. In: Silage science and technology (p. 95-139). Agron. Monogr. 42. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c3

Ruíz-Nieto, J. E., Hernández-Ruiz, J., Hernández-Marín, J., Mendoza-Carrillo, J., Abraham-Juárez, M., Isiordia-Lachica, P. M., & Mireles-Arriaga, A. I. (2020). Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) tree as a feed resource for animal growth. Agroforestry Systems, 94, 1139-1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00481-x

Santana, O. I., Peña, R. A., & Sánchez, D. J. I. (2025). Producción de forraje y cinetica de degradación en rumen del ensilado de híbridos de maíz de nervadura café versus convencionales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 16(13), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v16i3.6890

Sawal, R. K., Ratan, R., & Yadav, S. B. S. (2004). Mesquite (Prosopis spp.) pods as a feed resource for livestock-A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 17(5), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.719

Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., Paziecznik, N. M., & Richardson, D. M. (2014). Prosopis: a global assessment of the biography, benefits impact and management of one of the world worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants, 6, plu027. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu027

Tabosa, I. M., Souza, J. C., Graca, D. L., Barbosa-Filho, J. M., Almeida, R. N., & Riet-Correa, F. (2000). Neuronal vacuolation of the trigeminal nuclei in goats caused by ingestion of Prosopis juliflora pods (mesquite beans). Veterinary and Human Toxicology, 42(3), 155-158.

Tuovinen, O. H., Niemelä, S. I., & Rajala-Schultz, P. J. (2025). The role of microbes in ensiling. Microrganisms, 13(10), 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102237

Viana, D. L., Morais, P. F. J., Loiola, E. R., Felipe de O. J. P., Rodrigues do N. R., Mauro, S. E., Silva, A., E. J., Soarez, M. P. H., Lopes, O. R., & Rocha, B. L. (2023). Effect of different additive on the quality of rehydrated corn grain silage: A systematic review. Ruminants, 3(4), 425-444. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants3040035

Weiss, P. W., & Tebbe, A. W. (2019). Estimating digestible energy values of feeds and diets and integrating those values into net energy system. Translational Animal Science, 3, 953-961. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy119

Yi, Q., Yu, M., Wang, P., Du, J., Zaho, T., Jin, Y., Tang, H., & Yuan, B. (2023). Effects of moisture content and silage starter on the fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of waxy corn processing byproduct silage. Fermentation, 9, 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9121025

Authors

J. A. Granados-Niño
O. I. Santana
A. Reyes-González
J. A. Meza-Velázquez
M. J. López-Calderon
P. A. Domínguez-Martínez
J. A. Maldonado-Jáquez
J. I. Sánchez-Duarte
sanchez.juan@inifap.gob.mx (Primary Contact)
Granados-Niño, J. A., Santana, O. I. ., Reyes-González, A., Meza-Velázquez, J. A., López-Calderon, M. J. ., Domínguez-Martínez, P. A. ., Maldonado-Jáquez, J. A. ., & Sánchez-Duarte, J. I. (2026). Fermentation Profile and Nutrient Composition of Rehydrated Dry Mesquite Pod (Prosopis spp.) Silage with Increasing Moisture Levels. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 49(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.2.182

Article Details

How to Cite

Granados-Niño, J. A., Santana, O. I. ., Reyes-González, A., Meza-Velázquez, J. A., López-Calderon, M. J. ., Domínguez-Martínez, P. A. ., Maldonado-Jáquez, J. A. ., & Sánchez-Duarte, J. I. (2026). Fermentation Profile and Nutrient Composition of Rehydrated Dry Mesquite Pod (Prosopis spp.) Silage with Increasing Moisture Levels. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 49(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2026.49.2.182