Determinants of Sustainable Cattle Farming to Guide Policy and Intervention in Perú
Abstract
The absence of detailed knowledge about the factors that determine the sustainability of cattle farming has led, in many cases, to the formulation of policies and interventions that lack contextual relevance and sensitivity to the structural heterogeneity of livestock farms. The objective of this study was to identify the important factors that determine the sustainability of cattle farming systems through a three-dimensional analytical framework based on 16 key indicators. Based on these factors, this study recommends strategic interventions to improve the environmental stewardship, resilience, productivity, and overall household welfare of cattle farming. Using probability sampling, data were collected from 120 farmers and analyzed using cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), ANOVA, and Spearman correlation. The results revealed five distinct groups of cattle farmers differentiated by the age of the producer, economic dependence on cattle farming, annual yield, land use specialization, water availability, and soil erosion. Of these groups, Group 2 is particularly notable, with the highest sustainability index (64.03%), higher economic income, and greater economic dependence on cattle farming. While older producers with larger farms had higher economic and environmental scores, they also faced challenges such as a greater risk of erosion. By contrast, younger producers had less active but more innovation potential. Agricultural training was moderately related to better water management. These discoveries emphasize the need to formulate public policy and intervention strategies that focus on improving rural areas, diversification, enhancing education and improving ecological practice, while recognizing the heterogeneity of production profiles.
Full text article
References
Bacon, C. M., Getz, C., Kraus, S., Montenegro, M., & Holland, K. (2012). The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05226-170441
Barrezueta-Unda, S. A. (2018). Construcción de indicadores agrarios para medir la sostenibilidad de la producción de cacao en el Oro, Ecuador. Retrieved February 23, 2024, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154757523.pdf
Ben-Eli, M. U. (2018). Sustainability: definition and five core principles, a systems perspective. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0564-3
Benitez-Altuna, F., Trienekens, J., & Gaitán-Cremaschi, D. (2023). Categorizing the sustainability of vegetable production in Chile: a farming typology approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2202538
Biswas, B., Singh, A., Rai, P. K., Kumar, J., & Walker, S. (2022). GIS based study of reclamation of degraded semi-arid soil: a case study from Rajasthan, India. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 42(3), 302–315.
Bousbia, A., Gueroui, Y., Aouadi, A., Teweldebirhan, M. D., Bessa, R. J. B., Symeon, G., & Boudalia, S. (2024). Typology analysis of cattle farms in Northeast Algeria: Potential for sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, 218(June), 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103995
Bragaglio, A., Romano, E., Brambilla, M., Bisaglia, C., Lazzari, A., Giovinazzo, S., & Cutini, M. (2023). A comparison between two specialized dairy cattle farms in the upper Po Valley. Precision agriculture as a strategy to improve sustainability. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 11(September), 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100146
Chen, J., Li, Z., Xiao, H., Ning, K., & Tang, C. (2021). Effects of land use and land cover on soil erosion control in southern China: Implications from a systematic quantitative review. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, 111924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111924
Cirella, G. T., & Russo, A. (2020). Special issue sustainable interdisciplinarity: Human-nature relations. Sustainability, 12(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010002
Escribano, A. J., Gaspar, P., Mesías, F. J., Pulido, A. F., & Escribano, M. (2014). A sustainability assessment of organic and conventional beef cattle farms in agroforestry systems: The case of the ”dehesa” rangelands. ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria, 110(4), 343–367.
FAO. (2025). Producción animal. Retrieved January 12, 2025, from https://www.fao.org/animal-production/es/#:~:text=El ganado contribuye a casi el 40%25 de,suministro mundial de proteínas alimentarias procede del ganado.
Fernández, P. D., Gasparri, N. I., Rojas, T. N., Banegas, N. R., Nasca, J. A., Jobbágy, E. G., & Kuemmerle, T. (2024). Silvopastoral management for lowering trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in tropical dry woodlands. Science of the Total Environment, 912, 168973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168973
Gobierno regional de Cajamarca. (2023). Cajamarca alberga a más de 755 mil vacunos y registra el 17,5% de producción lechera a nivel nacional. Retrieved December 1, 2024, from 22-11-2023 website: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/regioncajamarca/noticias/935907-cajamarca-alberga-a-mas-de-755-mil-vacunos-y-registra-el-17-5-de-produccion-lechera-a-nivel-nacional
Gómez Urrutia, V., & Jiménez Figueroa, A. (2015). Corresponsabilidad familiar y el equilibrio trabajo-familia: medios para mejorar la equidad de género. Polis, 14(40), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-65682015000100018
Gu, B., Ren, C., Zhou, X., Wang, C., Guo, Y., Diao, Y., Shen, S., Reis, S., Li, W., Xu, J., & Gu, B. (2023). Aging threatens sustainability of smallholder farming in China. Nature, 616(7955), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05738-w
Huertas, S. M., Bobadilla, P. E., Alcántara, I., Akkermans, E., & van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M. (2021). Benefits of silvopastoral systems for keeping beef cattle. Animals, 11(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040992
INEI. (2023). Sistema Regional para la Toma de Decisiones. Retrieved December 8, 2024, from https://systems.inei.gob.pe/SIRTOD/app/consulta
Klasen, S., Meyer, K. M., Dislich, C., Euler, M., Faust, H., Gatto, M., Hettig, E., Melati, D., Surati, I., Otten, F., Pérez-Cruzado, C., Steinebach, S., Suria, T., & Wiegand, K. (2016). Economic and ecological trade-offs of agricultural specialization at different spatial scales. Ecological Economics, 122, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.001
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR : An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and Analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899
Milera, M., Machado, L., Amaro, O., Hernández, M., & Sánchez, S. (2019). Intensive rational grazing as alternative for low-emission animal husbandry. Pastos y Forrajes, 42(1), 3–12. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-3425
Milone, P., & Ventura, F. (2019). New generation farmers: Rediscovering the peasantry. Journal of Rural Studies, 65, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.009
Muhamad, G. M., Heshmati, A., & Khayyat, N. T. (2021). How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources? Resources Policy, 72, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102047
Mulema, A. A., Jogo, W., Damtew, E., Mekonnen, K., & Thorne, P. (2019). Women farmers’ participation in the agricultural research process: implications for agricultural sustainability in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1569578
Murgueitio, E., Chará, J., Solarte, A., Uribe, F., Zapata, C., & Rivera, J. (2013). Agroforestería pecuaria y sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos (SSPi) para la adaptación ganadera al cambio climático. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 26, 313-316. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324845
Ouali, M., Belhouadjeb, F. A., Soufan, W., & Rihan, H. Z. (2023). Sustainability evaluation of pastoral livestock systems. Animals, 13(8), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081335
Pollesch, N. L., & Dale, V. H. (2016). Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods and implications. Ecological Economics, 130, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.018
Porto, R. T., & Sili, M. E. (2020). Toma de decisiones y gestión productiva en el sector agropecuario del Noreste de La Pampa (Argentina). Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 58(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2020.198357
Ren, C., Zhou, X., Wang, C., Guo, Y., Diao, Y., Shen, S., Reis, S., Li, W., Xu, J., & Gu, B. (2023). Ageing threatens sustainability of smallholder farming in China. Nature, 616(7955), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05738-w
Ruiz Méndez, D., Quezada, M. E., & Vega Valero, C. Z. (2020). Estadística robusta aplicada a las medidas de localización y escala: Nota Técnica. Revista Digital Internacional de Psicología y Ciencia Social, 6(2), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.22402/j.rdipycs.unam.6.2.2020.302.499-517
Sánchez, A. C., Kamau, H. N., Grazioli, F., & Jones, S. K. (2022). Financial profitability of diversified farming systems: A global meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 201, 107595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107595
Sandoval Yate, D. F., Triana Ángel, N., & Burkart, S. (2024). Pathways towards sustainability: A capacity needs assessment for the implementation of the Colombian Policy for Sustainable Cattle 2022–2050. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103472
Sanjari, G., Yu, B., Ghadiri, H., Ciesiolka, C. A. A., & Rose, C. W. (2009). Effects of time-controlled grazing on runoff and sediment loss. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 47(8), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09032
SENAMHI. (2025). Mapa climático del Perú. Retrieved February 24, 2025, from https://www.senamhi.gob.pe/?p=mapa-climatico-del-peru
Stock, P., & Burton, R. J. F. (2011). Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability, 3(8), 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081090
Superintendencia Nacional de Salud. (2023). Adultos mayores son el grupo con mayor vulneración de sus derechos en salud. Retrieved December 18, 2024, from 28 de febrero de 2023 website: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/susalud/noticias/718639-adultos-mayores-son-el-grupo-con-mayor-vulneracion-de-sus-derechos-en-salud
Torres Jara de García, G. P., Durand-Chávez, L. M., Quispe-Ccasa, H. A., Linares-Rivera, J. L., Segura Portocarrero, G. T., Calderón Tito, R., Vásquez Pérez, H. V., Maicelo Quintana, J. L., Ampuero-Trigoso, G., Robles Rodríguez, R. R., & Saucedo-Uriarte, J. A. (2023). Sustainability of livestock farms: The case of the district of Moyobamba, Peru. Heliyon, 9(2), e13153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13153
Varijakshapanicker, P., McKune, S., Miller, L., Hendrickx, S., Balehegn, M., Dahl, G. E., & Adesogan, A. T. (2019). Sustainable livestock systems to improve human health, nutrition, and economic status. Animal Frontiers, 9(4), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz041
Williams, M., Murphy, C. P., Sleator, R. D., Ring, S. C., & Berry, D. P. (2021). Genetic and nongenetic factors associated with lactation length in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(1), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18941
Zarei, Z., Karami, E., & Keshavarz, M. (2020). Co-production of knowledge and adaptation to water scarcity in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 262, 110283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110283
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Article Details
How to Cite
