Comparative Performance Analysis of YOLOv10-Based Models with CBAM and SPPFCSPC for Body Condition Score Assessment in Beef Cattle
Abstract
Body condition score assessment serves as a critical metric for evaluating the health, nutritional status, and overall well-being of beef cattle, playing a pivotal role in herd management and productivity optimization. Traditional manual BCS assessment methods are inherently subjective, labor-intensive, and impractical for large-scale operations, thereby necessitating an automated and data-driven approach. This study investigates the performance of YOLOv10-based deep learning models, incorporating the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) and spatial pyramid pooling-fast cross-stage partial connections (SPPFCSPC) to enhance feature extraction, classification accuracy, and computational efficiency in BCS estimation. A total of 432 annotated images representing five BCS categories (1–5) were used for model training and evaluation. The models were assessed using precision, recall, and F1 Score, with expert-labeled ground truth ensuring robustness. Results show that the YOLOv10x variant achieved the highest classification accuracy of 88.2%, highlighting its superior detection capability. YOLOv10m exhibited a balanced trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency, achieving an F1 Score of 79.2%. The integration of CBAM improved precision but slightly reduced recall, whereas SPPFCSPC enhanced recall at the expense of increased computational complexity. Notably, YOLOv10n achieved the fastest inference time of 1.0 ms but with a lower accuracy of 82.4%, underscoring the trade-off between model depth and real-time applicability. These findings validate the effectiveness of attention-based and multi-scale feature learning strategies for improving the automation of BCS classification in beef cattle.
Full text article
References
Azzaro, G., Caccamo, M., Ferguson, J. D., Battiato, S., Farinella, G. M., Guarnera, G. C., Puglisi, G., Petriglieri, R., & Licitra, G. (2011). Objective estimation of body condition score by modeling cow body shape from digital images. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(5), 2126–2137. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3467
Ghaffari, M. H., Sadri, H., & Sauerwein, H. (2023). Assessment of body condition score and body fat reserves in relation to insulin sensitivity and metabolic phenotyping in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(2), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22549
He, H., Chen, C., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). Body condition scoring network based on improved YOLOX. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 26(3), 1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-023-01171-x
Jooshin, H. K., Nangir, M., & Seyedarabi, H. (2024). Inception‐YOLO: Computational cost and accuracy improvement of the YOLOv5 model based on employing modified CSP, SPPF, and inception modules. IET Image Processing, 18(8), 1985-1999. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.13077
Li, J., Zeng, P., Yue, S., Zheng, Z., Qin, L., & Song, H. (2025). Automatic body condition scoring system for dairy cows in group state based on improved YOLOv5 and video analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 15(2), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2025.01.010
Long, S. T., ToanN. C., GioiP. V., & HangP. T. (2022). Factors associated with the odds of pregnancy for dairy cattle after treatment of ovarian disorders in Northern Vietnam. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 45(3), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2022.45.3.277
Nagy, S. Á., Kilim, O., Csabai, I., Gábor, G., & Solymosi, N. (2023). Impact evaluation of score classes and annotation regions in deep learning-based dairy cow body condition prediction. Animals, 13, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020194
Patterson, D. J., Perry, R. C., and Kiracofe, G. H. (2021). Body condition scoring of beef cattle. https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g2230.
Qiao, Y., Kong, H., Clark, C., Lomax, S., Su, D., Eiffert, S., & Sukkarieh, S. (2021). Intelligent perception for cattle monitoring: A review for cattle identification, body condition score evaluation, and weight estimation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 185, 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106143
Spoliansky, R., Edan, Y., Parmet, Y., & Halachmi, I. (2016). Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional Kinect camera. Journal of dairy science, 99(9),7714-7725. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10607
Utaminingrum, F., Johan, A. W. S. B., Somawirata, I. K., Risnandar, & Septiarini, A. (2022). Descending stairs and floors classification as control reference in autonomous smart wheelchair. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8), Part B, 6040–6047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.07.025
Utaminingrum, F., Alqadri, A. M., Somawirata, I. K., Karim, C., Septiarini, A., Lin, C. Y., & Shih, T. K. (2023). Feature selection of gray-level co-occurrence matrix using genetic algorithm with extreme learning machine classification for early detection of pole roads. Results in Engineering, 20, 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101437
Wang, A., Chen, H., Liu, L., Chen, K., Lin, Z., Han, J., & Ding, G. (2024). Yolov10: Real-time end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14458. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14458
Wang, Y., Mücher, S., Wang, W., Guo, L., & Kooistra, L. (2023). A review of three-dimensional computer vision used in precision livestock farming for cattle growth management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 206, 107687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107687
Xiong, Y., Condotta, I. C., Musgrave, J. A., Brown-Brandl, T. M., & Mulliniks, J. T. (2023). Estimating body weight and body condition score of mature beef cows using depth images. Translational Animal Science, 7(1), txad085. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad085
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Tropical Animal Science Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.