Pengaruh Substitusi Pakan Komersial dengan Pakan Hasil Samping Agroindustri pada Babi Fase Grower

Effect of Agroindustrial By-Product as Commercial Feed Substitution on Grower Phase Pigs

Authors

  • A M Pongtuluran Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • I K G Wiryawan Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Salundik Departemen Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Peternakan, Fakultas Peternakan, IPB University, Jl. Agatis Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • W Negara Pusat Riset Peternakan, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.23.1.1-9

Keywords:

Commercial Feed, pigs, by-products, agroindustry, substitution

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the impact of substituting commercial feed with agroindustrial by-product feed on the growth performance of pigs in the grower phase and the benefits obtained by farmers. A total of 20 pigs aged 18 weeks were tested in a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications. The feed treatments were P0= commercial feed (CP 552), P1= 50% CP552 and 50% agroindustry feed, P2= 100% agroindustry feed, and P3= P2 feed with the addition of phytase and mannase enzymes. The results showed that feed consumption, body weight gain, and feed conversion were not significantly different among the treatments. The digestibility of the P0 was significantly higher than that of P1, P2, and P3 (p<0.05). The digestibility of the P3 was not significantly different from that of the P1; however, it was significantly higher than P2 (p<0.05).  The IOFC of P2 was higher than P0 and P1, while P3 resulted in the highest IOFC among treatments. It can be concluded that utilizing feed containing agro-industrial by-products could substitute 100% of commercial feed in growing pigs and provides 60% higher income than commercial feed. Moreover, additional phytase and mannase enzymes on agroindustrial by-products feed might provide 89% higher income than commercial feed.

Key words:        agroindustry, by-products, commercial feed, pigs, substitution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aderibigbe AS, Park CS, Johnson T, Velayudhan DE, Vinyeta E & Adeola O. 2024. Efficacy of a novel multi-enzime feed additive on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiome of weanling pigs fed corn-wheat or wheat-barley-based diet. Journal of Animal Science, 102: 112 https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae064

Afreen M, & Ucak I. 2020. Fish processing wastes used as feed ingredient for animal feed and aquaculture feed. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 6(2): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.18331/SFS2020.6.2.7

Ajila CM, Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Godbout S & Valéro JR. 2012. Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 32(4): 382–400. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2012.659172

da Silva CA, Callegari MA, Dias CP, de Souza KL, de Carvalho RH, Alebrante L, da Silva Martins CC, Heck A & Fascina V B. 2022. Increasing doses of bacterial fitase (Citrobacter braakii) improves performance and carcass characteristics of pigs in growing and finishing phases. Animals, 12(19) : 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192552

Genova JL, Rupolo PE, de Azevedo LB , Henz D, Carvalho ST, Kipper M, de Gonçalves GAC, Vilela HLO, Pasquetti TJ, de Oliveira NTE, Dietrich ARM & de Carvalho PL O. 2023. Β-Mannase supplementation in diets reduced in 85 Kcal metabolizable energy/Kg containing xylanase-fitase improves gain to feed ratio, nutrient usage, and backfat thickness in finisher pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1144692

Guachamín-Guachamín RA & Quisirumbay-Gaibor JR. 2024. Effect of fitases in pig diets on production performance: Meta-analysis. Ciencia Tecnologia Agropecuaria, 36(6): 4519 - 452. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol25_num1_art:3362

Henry DD, Ciriaco FM, Araujo RC, Fontes PLP, Rostoll-cangiano L, Sanford CD, Schulmeister TM, Jr, CBD, Lamb GC & Dilorenzo N. 2020. Palatability in pigs, the pleasure of consumption1. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 12(1): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.09.005%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.060

Ho NN, Do TL, Tran DT & Nguyen TT. 2022. Indigenous pig production and welfare of ultra-poor ethnic minority households in the Northern mountains of Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1): 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01348-6

Hoang Q, N, & Guntoro B. 2020. Challenges, opportunities and prospects of swine industry in vietnam. Proceeding International Conference on Green Agroindustry, 4 :189–196.

Hong SM, Jang HD, Kim HJ, Yoo JS, Lee JH & Kim IH. 2011. Effects of enzime complex supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles and economic feed cost in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 53(2) :113–118. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2011.53.2.113

Huenul E, Salazar L, Frias D, Videka M, Luna D, Dwyer DM & Figueroa J. 2023. Effects of flavour variety on the intake and palatability of commercial feed in nursery pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1218198

Iyai DA, Nurhayati D, Arim M, Saragih D, Orisu M, Djunaedi M, Randa SY, Warsono I, Syufi Y, Murwanto A, Pakage S, Mulyadi, Rumetor S, Suawa E, Rahardjo D, Baaka A, Arizona R, Seseray D, Monim H, Wajo MJ. 2021). Analyses of interlinked actors in determining the potential business beneficiaries of small-scale pig farming systems in West Papua, Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(2): e05911https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05911

Jang JC, Kim KH, Kim DH, Jang SK, Hong JS, Heo PS & Kim, Y. Y. 2020. Effects of increasing levels of palm kernel meal containing β-mannase to growing-finishing pig diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and pork quality. Livestock Science, 238: 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104041

Kaca N I, Tonga Y, Suariani L, Sanjaya GAMP, I & Made Yudiastari NM, Ketut Etty Suwitari, KEN. 2021. Dry matter digestibility, organic matter and digestibility in vitro of setaria grass at types and different dosage of fertilizers. International Journal of Life Sciences Available Online at Www.Sciencescholar.Us, 5(3): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijls.v5n3.1530

Keraru EN, Harianto, Yusalina. 2021. Profitability and Technical Efficiency of Household Scale Pig Farming in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertania. !7 (1): 27-38

Kim MJ, Ingale SL, Hosseindoust A, Choi YH, Kim KY & Chae BJ. 2021. Synergistic effect of exogenous multi-enzime and fitase on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood metabolites, intestinal microflora and morphology in broilers fed corn-wheat-soybean meal diets. Animal Bioscience, 34(8): 1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0663

Liu F, Li J, Ni H, Azad MAK, Mo K & Yin Y. 2023. The effects of fitase and non-starch polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzimes on trace element deposition, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of growing–finishing pigs. Animals, 13(4): 549 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040549

Malenica D, Kass M & Bhat R. 2023. Sustainable management and valorization of agri-food industrial wastes and by-products as animal feed: For ruminants, non-ruminants and as poultry feed. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1): 117 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010117

Matialo CC, Elly FH, Dalie S & Rorimpandey B. 2020. Pengaruh biaya pakan terhadap keuntungan peternak babi di desa Werdhi Agung kecamatan Dumoga Barat. ZOOTEC. 40 (2) : 724-734. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/zootek/article/view/30194

Ouweltjes W, Verschuren LMG, Pijlman J, Bergsma R, Schokker D, Knol EF, van der Aar PJ, Molist F & Calus MPL. 2018. The repeatability of individual nutrient digestibility in pigs. Livestock Science, 207: 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.11.013

Parameters OS. 2020. Defatted rice bran supplementation in diets of finshing. Animals 10 (3) :449 doi: 10.3390/ani10030449

Pomar C & Remus A. 2019. Precision pig feeding: A breakthrough toward sustainability. Animal Frontiers, 9(2): 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz006

Quang HV & Tuong T Van. 2018. Economics of scale in pig production in vietnam. Tạp Chí Nông Nghiệp và Phát Triển Nông Thôn, 11: 0–13.

Rao ZX, Tokach MD, Woodworth JC, DeRouchey JM, Goodband RD & Gebhardt JT. 2023. Effects of various feed additives on finishing pig growth performance and carcass characteristics: A Review. Animals, 13(2):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020200

Riwukore JR, Habaora F, Hildayanti SK & Susanto Y. 2019. The local community perception towards pig farming in Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(5): 9660–9664. https://www.journalajst.com/local-community-perception-towards-pig-farming-kupang-city-east-nusa-tenggara-indonesia

Rojas OJ & Stein HH. 2017. Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1

Shastak Y, Ader P, Feuerstein D, Ruehle R & Matuschek M. 2015. β-Mannan and mannase in poultry nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 71(1): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915000136

Shurson GC, Hung YT, Jang JC & Urriola PE. 2021. Measures matter—determining the true nutri-physiological value of feed ingredients for swine. Animals, 11(5): 1–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051259

Sureshkumar S, Song J, Sampath V & Kim I. 2023a. Exogenous enzimes as zootechnical additives in monogastric animalfFeed: A Review. Agriculture, 13(12): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122195

Sureshkumar S, Song J, Sampath V & Kim, I. 2023b. Exogenous enzimes as zootechnical additives in monogastric animal feed: A Review. Agriculture 13(12) : 2195 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122195

Szabó C, Lugata K J & Ortega ADSV. 2023. Gut Health and Influencing Factors in Pigs. Animals, 13(8) :1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081350

Tala S & Irfan M. 2020. Budidaya ternak babi fase starter dengan penggunaan sumber pakan konsentrat yang berbeda di kabupaten Tana Toraja. Jurnal Galung Tropika, 9(1): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31850/jgt.v9i1.517

Torres-Pitarch A, Hermans D, Manzanilla EG, Bindelle J, Everaert N, Beckers Y, Torrallardona D, Bruggeman G, Gardiner GE & Lawlor PG. 2017. Effect of feed enzimes on digestibility and growth in weaned pigs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 233: 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.024

Ullo M, Randa SY & Hartini S. 2020. Kecernaan nutrien dan performa ternak babi fase starter yang diberi pakan campuran bahan pakan limbah. Livestock and Animal Research. 18 (2) : 97 https://103.23.224.239/lar/article/view/42931

Valente JDT, Genova JL, Kim SW, Saraiva A & Rocha GC. 2024. Carbohydrases and fitase in poultry and pig nutrition: A Review beyond the Nutrients and Energy Matrix. Animals, 14(2) ; 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020226

Vangroenweghe F, Poulsen K & Thas O. 2021. Supplementation of a β-mannase enzime reduces post-weaning diarrhea and antibiotic use in piglets on an alternative diet with additional soybean meal. Porcine Health Management, 7(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-021-00191-5

Vangroenweghe F & Thas, O. 2022. Supplementation of a β-Mannase Enzime improves feed efficiency in palm kernel expeller rich swine diets. Austin Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism, 9(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjnutrmetab.2022.1123

Vastolo A, Calabrò S & Cutrignelli MI.2022. A review on the use of agro-industrial CO-products in animals’ diets. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 21(1): 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2022.2039562

Wang YM, Yu HT, Zhou JY, Zeng XF, Wang G, Cai S, Huang S, Zhu ZP, Tan JJ, Johnston LJ, Levesque CL & Qiao SY. 2019. Effects of feeding growing-finishing pigs with low crude protein diets on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and nutrient digestibility in different areas of China. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 256: 114256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114256

Widayati TW, Rahayu BWI, Rahardjo DD & Santoso B. 2019. The utilization of agricultural and food industry wastes as feed of grower pigs in Manokwari Regency West Papua. Animal Production, 20(3): 165 - 172. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2018.20.3.723

Xiong X, Tan B, Song M, JiP, Kim K, Yin Y & Liu Y. 2019. Nutritional intervention for the intestinal development and health of weaned pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00046

Yang K, Qing Y, Yu Q, Tang X, Chen G, Fang R & Liu H. 2021. By-product feeds: Current understanding and future perspectives. Agriculture 11(3): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030207

Yang W, Jiang F, Yu B, Huang Z, Luo Y, Wu A, Zheng P, Mao X, Yu J, Luo J, Yan H & He, J. 2023. Effect of different dietary lipid sources on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health in weaned pigs. Animals, 13(19) :1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13193006

Zijlstra RT & Beltranena E. 2022. Feeding coproducts to pigs to reduce feed cost and reach sustainable food production. Animal Frontiers, 12(6): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac067

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Pengaruh Substitusi Pakan Komersial dengan Pakan Hasil Samping Agroindustri pada Babi Fase Grower: Effect of Agroindustrial By-Product as Commercial Feed Substitution on Grower Phase Pigs. (2025). Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 23(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29244/jintp.23.1.1-9