Section Research Articles

Design and Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Modified Aerobic Composters for Food and Agricultural Waste Management

Vol. 10 No. 2: October 2025:

Rasendriya Arkananta Bhanu Loppies (1), Joana Febrita (2), Chusnul Arif (3)

(1) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(3) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

The management of organic waste, such as food scraps and straw, remains a challenge, particularly in residential areas that produce large amounts of waste but lack effective waste management systems. This study aimed to design and evaluate the performance of two types of aerobic composters: a conventional method and a modified method using a passive aeration system with perforated pipes. Six compost material variations were tested based on different ratios of food waste to straw and observed over an eight-week period using key parameters such as temperature, height, pH, moisture content, organic carbon, nitrogen content, and C/N ratio. The results showed that All compost variations met the compost quality standards of SNI 7763:2024. No significant difference was found between the conventional and modified methods based on ANOVA test results for the C/N ratio and pH. This study concluded that variation B6 was the most favorable, as it produced a C/N ratio closest to the standard value, met the quality standard criteria during the composting process, and reached acceptable pH and carbon levels more quickly than the other variations. Therefore, the compost quality of variation A2 and A3 was superior and reached maturity in a shorter time compared to the other treatments.

References

[1] Wang X, Teng Y, Wang X, Xu Y, Li R, Sun Y, et al. Effects of combined pollution of organic pollutants and heavy metals on biodiversity and soil multifunctionality in e-waste contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2022;440:129727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129727.

[2] FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2020. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2020.

[3] Lee H, Kim S, Park J. Microbial dynamics and organic matter decomposition during composting of food waste. J Environ Manag. 2019;248:109299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109299.

[4] Ayumi IDE, Lutfi M, Nugroho A. Efektivitas tipe pengomposan (konvensional, aerasi, dan rak segitiga) terhadap sifat fisik dan kimia kompos dari sludge biogas dan serbuk gergaji. J Keteknikan Pertanian Tropis dan Biosistem. 2017;5(3):265–72.

[5] Ariyanti M, Samudro G, Handayani DS. Penentuan rasio bahan sampah organik optimum terhadap kinerja Compost Solid Phase Microbial Fuel Cells (CSMFCs). J Presipitasi. 2019;16(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v16i1.24-28.

[6] Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. Bioresour Technol. 2008;100(22):5444–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027.

[7] Jassey B, Zaman S, Ceesay B, Touray K, Ngum I, Prakoso H. The effectiveness of EM4 and Local Micro-organisms (LOM) Activators in Organic Waste Processing in Brikama Market West Coast Region, The Gambia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;1098(1):012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1098/1/012010.

[8] Sarker A, Baul T, Nath T, Karmakar S, Paul A. Household solid waste management in a recently established municipality of Bangladesh: Prevailing practices, residents’ perceptions, attitude and awareness. World Dev Sustain. 2023;2:100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100120.

[9] [BSN] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. SNI 7763:2024 tentang Pupuk Organik Padat. Jakarta: BSN; 2024.

[10] Herlina F. 2014. Bioactivators effectiveness and utilization in bulking agents of water hyacinth as compost. Jurnal Integrasi Sistem Industri. 1(2): 35-44. doi: 10.24853/jisi.1.2.%25p.

[11] Islam S, Hoque M. 2019. Temporal Changes of Physical Parameters of Solid Waste During Barrel Composting. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources. 11(1):153-157. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v11i1-2.43382. [12] Qiao C, Penton C, Liu C, Shen Z, Ou Y, Liu Z, et al. Key extracellular enzymes triggered high-efficiency composting associated with bacterial community succession. Bioresour Technol. 2019;288:121576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121576.

[12] Widarti BN, Kasran RF, Sarwono E. 2015. Pengaruh ukuran bahan terhadap kompos pada pemanfaatan tandan kosong kelapa sawit. Jukung: Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan. 1(1): 1–7. doi: 10.20527/jukung.v1i1.1034.

[13] Bachtiar B, Ahmad AH. 2019. Analisis kandungan hara kompos johar Cassia siamea dengan penambahan aktivator PROMI. Bioma: Jurnal Biologi Makassar. 4(1): 68-76. https://doi.org/10.20956/bioma.v4i1.6493

[14] Zhang W, Yu C, Wang X, Hai L. Increased abundance of nitrogen transforming bacteria by higher C/N ratio reduces the total losses of N and C in chicken manure and corn stover mix composting. Bioresour Technol. 2019;294:122410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122410.

[15] Eiland F, Klamer M, Lind A, Leth M, Bååth E. Influence of initial C/N ratio on chemical and microbial composition during long term composting of straw. Microb Ecol. 2001;41:272–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000071.

How to Cite

1.
Design and Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Modified Aerobic Composters for Food and Agricultural Waste Management . J-Sil [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 28 [cited 2026 Jan. 6];10(2):327-36. Available from: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jsil/article/view/67181