Section Research Articles

Analysis of Landslide Vulnerability and Its Impact on Population and Infrastructure Exposure in Central Bogor District Using AHP and Open Geospatial Data

Vol. 10 No. 2: October 2025:

Vincent Vincent (1), Zainab Ramadhanis (2), Sutoyo Sutoyo (3), Yuli Suharnoto (4), Tri Sudibyo (5)

(1) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(3) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(4) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
(5) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, IPB University, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Indonesia’s location at the convergence of three active tectonic plates makes it highly susceptible to various natural disasters, with landslides being among the most frequent and destructive, particularly in mountainous and densely populated urban areas. Central Bogor District in West Java represents a vulnerable area where steep topography, high rainfall intensity, and dense population heighten landslide risk. Despite recurrent landslide events, comprehensive vulnerability assessments integrating both physical and socio-environmental factors remain limited. This study aims to produce a spatially explicit landslide vulnerability map for Central Bogor District by utilizing open geospatial data and applying a GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to assign weights to four primary physical parameters—rainfall, slope, lithology, and land cover—based on their relative contribution to landslide susceptibility. Supporting data were derived from Sentinel-1A imagery (InSAR), Landsat-8 classification, CHIRPS precipitation records, and official geological maps. These physical layers were then integrated with exposure indicators, including population density, infrastructure distribution, and accessibility data from OpenStreetMap. The results delineated three landslide vulnerability zones: high (49.87 ha), moderate (481.82 ha), and low (236.45 ha). High-risk zones, such as Gudang and Paledang Sub-districts, feature steep slopes, weak geological formations, and dense settlements. Overlay analysis also revealed a significant concentration of critical infrastructure within moderate-to-high vulnerability zones, highlighting exposure and potential service disruption during hazard events. The study underscores the critical value of combining open geospatial data with AHP-based weighting to inform targeted disaster mitigation, infrastructure planning, and resilient urban development. The resulting maps can guide policy and preparedness strategies to reduce landslide impacts in high-risk urban areas.

References

[1] Murjaya J. Seismotektonik wilayah Indonesia Timur. Buletin Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika. 2023;4(3):14–22.
[2] Tjandra K. Empat bencana geologi yang Paling Mematikan. Yogyakarta: UGM PRESS; 2018.
[3] Pramono J, Kusumastuti D, Choerudin A. The community participation in disaster mitigation to managing the impact of natural disasters in Indonesia. 2020.
[4] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana [BNPB]. Data dan Informasi Bencana Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): BNPB; 2024.
[5] Arsyad U, Barkey R, Wahyuni, Matandung KK. Karakteristik tanah longsor di Daerah Aliran Sungai Tangka. J Hutan dan Masyarakat. 2018;10(1):203–14.
[6] Hidayat R, Sutanto SJ, Hidayah A, Ridwan B, Mulyana A. Development of a landslide early warning system in Indonesia. Geosciences. 2019;9(10):451. doi:10.3390/geosciences9100451
[7] Bagal MG, Sorate DR, Desai PA. Geo-technical and geological study, management plan of landslide. J Adv Sci Technol. 2023;20(1):119–126. doi:10.29070/wc8dv634
[8] Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi [PVMBG]. Laporan pemeriksaan bencana gerakan tanah Kec. Bogor Tengah, Kota Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 5]. Available from: https://geologi.esdm.go.id/
[9] Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah [BPBD]. Kota Bogor. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 5]. Available from: https://bpbd.kotabogor.go.id/
[10] Feng Q, Xu H, Wu Z, You Y, Liu W, Ge S. Improved Goldstein interferogram filter based on local fringe frequency estimation. Sensors. 2016 Nov 23;16(11):1976.
[11] Lang R, Shao G, Pijanowski BC, Farnsworth RL. Optimizing unsupervised classifications of remotely sensed imagery with a data-assisted labeling approach. Computers & Geosciences. 2008 Dec 1;34(12):1877-85.
[12] Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1(1):83. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
[13] Susanti PD, Miardini A, Harjadi B. Analisis kerentanan tanah longsor sebagai dasar mitigasi di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. J Penelit Pengelolaan DAS. 2017;1(1):49–59.
[14] Scarpelli G, Ferretti A, Mammoliti E, Ruggeri P, Sakellariadi E. Ground investigation: a tool for landslide risk mitigation of infrastructures. Procedia Struct Integr. 2024;62:530–537. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.075
[15] Pollock W, Wartman J. Human vulnerability to landslides. GeoHealth. 2020;4(10):e2020GH000287. doi:10.1029/2020GH000287

How to Cite

1.
Analysis of Landslide Vulnerability and Its Impact on Population and Infrastructure Exposure in Central Bogor District Using AHP and Open Geospatial Data. J-Sil [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 28 [cited 2025 Dec. 23];10(2):287-96. Available from: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jsil/article/view/66966