Optimizing Organizational Performance in Bridge Maintenance using Stakeholder Analysis

Rully Andhika Karim; Naufal Budi Laksono; Fahreza Ardiyanto; Yusuf Latief; Bambang  Trigunarsyah

doi:10.29244/jsil.10.1.127-138

Rully Andhika Karim ⁽¹⁾, Naufal Budi Laksono ⁽²⁾, Fahreza Ardiyanto ⁽³⁾, Yusuf Latief ⁽⁴⁾, Bambang Trigunarsyah ⁽⁵⁾

(1) Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 16424, Indonesia

(2) Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 16424, Indonesia

(3) Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 16424, Indonesia

(4) Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 16424, Indonesia

(5) School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Australia, Australia

Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Bridge maintenance and care is an important aspect in maintaining the safety and efficiency of transportation infrastructure. However, challenges in coordination between various stakeholders often hamper operational effectiveness. This study aims to analyze the organization of bridge maintenance and care work using a stakeholder analysis approach, in order to improve organizational performance. The methods used in this study are qualitative and quantitative approaches, involving data collection through in-depth interviews and surveys of stakeholders, including the government, contractors, and user communities. The data obtained were analyzed to identify factors that influence organizational performance in bridge maintenance. The results show that active stakeholder involvement and effective communication contribute significantly to increasing efficiency and effectiveness in the bridge maintenance process. This study confirms that the application of stakeholder analysis can improve organizational performance in bridge maintenance by strengthening relationships between stakeholders and responding to their needs and expectations. Practical recommendations for the implementation of this strategy are presented, including the importance of communication training and collaboration between stakeholders. This study is expected to contribute to the development of policies and best practices in bridge infrastructure maintenance in the future.

References

[1] J. D. Alamsjah, “Estimasi tahun konstruksi jembatan di Indonesia menggunakan analisis data satelit landsat,” 2020, Accessed: Aug. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/12609
[2] A. Muhammad Ridho Fakhrin, “Evaluasi Kelembagaan pada Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan Tol Trans Sumatera Berbasis Risiko untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Waktu = Risk-Based Institutional Evaluation of Trans Sumatera Toll Road Infrastructure Development to Improve Time Performance,” Universitas Indonesia Library. Accessed: Jul. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://lib.ui.ac.id
[3] “Jumlah Jembatan Nasional | Open Data PUPR.” Accessed: Aug. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://data.pu.go.id/dataset/jumlah-jembatan-nasional
[4] P. Sriraj, B. Zou, L. Dirks, N. P. Farazi, and ..., “Maritime freight data collection systems and database to support performance measures and market analyses,” FHWA-ICT-20 …, no. Query date: 2024-07-16 22:11:14, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/116677
[5] B. GANI, “EVALUASI METODE ‘BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM’ INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Jembatan Kabupaten Agam),” masters, Universitas Andalas, 2016. Accessed: Aug. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://scholar.unand.ac.id/17349/
[6] F. Hariman, H. C. H, and A. Triwiyono, “EVALUASI DAN PROGRAM PEMELIHARAAN JEMBATAN DENGAN METODE BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS) (Studi Kasus : Empat Jembatan Propinsi D.I. Yogyakarta),” Civil Engineering Forum Teknik Sipil, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 581–593, 2007.
[7] J. Xue, G. Q. Shen, Y. Li, J. Wang, and I. Zafar, “Dynamic Stakeholder-Associated Topic Modeling on Public Concerns in Megainfrastructure Projects: Case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 36, no. 6, p. 04020078, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000845.
[8] J.-H. Chen, M.-C. Su, S.-K. Lin, W.-J. Lin, and M. Gheisari, “Smart bridge maintenance using cluster merging algorithm based on self-organizing map optimization,” Automation in Construction, vol. 152, p. 104913, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104913.
[9] J. Yu, J. Huo, Q. Shi, G. Sheng, and H. Zhang, “An Exploration on the Organizational Structure Design of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Authority,” in The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, E. Qi, J. Shen, and R. Dou, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp. 975–985. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37270-4_93.
[10] N. Laksono, Y. T. Hasiholan, Y. Latief, and D. E. Saputro, “Pengembangan Standar Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Pekerjaan Pemeliharaan dan Perawatan Struktur Atas Jembatan Beton Berbasis Risiko untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Keselamatan Konstruksi,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2024.
[11] A. D. Orcesi and C. F. Cremona, “A bridge network maintenance framework for Pareto optimization of stakeholders/users costs,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 1230–1243, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.013.
[12] J. Xue, G. Q. Shen, Y. Li, J. Wang, and I. Zafar, “Dynamic Stakeholder-Associated Topic Modeling on Public Concerns in Megainfrastructure Projects: Case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 36, no. 04020078, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000845.
[13] Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)–Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute, 2017.
[14] A. Khan, M. Waris, S. Panigrahi, M. Sajid, and ..., “Improving the performance of public sector infrastructure projects: Role of project governance and stakeholder management,” Journal of Management …, no. Query date: 2024-07-16 22:11:14, 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000886.
[15] T. Loi, “Stakeholder management: a case of its related capability and performance,” Management decision, no. Query date: 2024-07-16 22:11:14, 2016, doi: 10.1108/MD-06-2015-0244.
[16] A. J. C. Marinho and J. Couto, “Contribution to improvement of knowledge management in the construction industry - Stakeholders’ perspective on implementation in the largest construction companies,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2022.2132652.
[17] A. Becker and M. Caldwell, “Stakeholder perceptions of seaport resilience strategies: A case study of Gulfport (Mississippi) and Providence (Rhode Island),” Coastal Management, no. Query date: 2024-07-16 22:11:14, 2015, doi: 10.1080/08920753.2014.983422.
[18] F. Schiavone, D. Mancini, D. Leone, and ..., “Digital business models and ridesharing for value co-creation in healthcare: A multi-stakeholder ecosystem analysis,” … Forecasting and Social …, no. Query date: 2024-07-26 14:13:17, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521000792
[19] L. Bourne, Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. taylorfrancis.com, 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315610573.
[20] “(PDF) Stakeholder Power-Interest Analysis of disaster insurance for public infrastructure in Semarang City,” ResearchGate, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.14710/mkts.v26i2.32086.
[21] R. Goyal, M. J. Whelan, and T. L. Cavalline, “Multivariable Proportional Hazards-Based Probabilistic Model for Bridge Deterioration Forecasting,” J. Infrastruct. Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000534.