Analisis Siklus Hidup pada Campuran Aspal dengan Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Dengan Metode Life Cycle Asessment

Fardzanela Suwarto; Tri Sudibyo

doi:10.29244/jsil.9.2.315-326

Fardzanela Suwarto ⁽¹⁾, Tri Sudibyo ⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

(2) Universitas IPB, Indonesia

Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Penelitian ini mengevaluasi dampak lingkungan dari penggunaan Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) dalam campuran aspal dengan metode Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Variasi RAP mulai dari 0% hingga 50% dianalisis terhadap 18 kategori dampak, termasuk Global Warming, Water Consumption, dan Resource Scarcity. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa RAP mengurangi Mineral Resource Scarcity hingga 37,1%, Land Use 35,2%, dan Water Consumption sebesar 26,2%, dengan kontribusi terbesar berasal dari pengurangan penggunaan material baru. Namun, RAP meningkatkan dampak pada Terrestrial Ecotoxicity akibat konsumsi energi yang lebih tinggi pada fase pencampuran. Penelitian ini mendukung penggunaan RAP untuk meningkatkan keberlanjutan infrastruktur jalan dengan optimasi proses pencampuran untuk meminimalkan dampak negatif.

References

1. World Bank. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation in Road Construction and Rehabilitation, A Toolkit for Developing Countries; ROADEO Toolkit User Manual User Manual. A World Bank Rep. 2011;
2. Santero NJ, Masanet E, Horvath A. Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps. Resour Conserv Recycl [Internet]. 2011;55(9–10):810–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.009
3. Zhao Z, Xiao F, Amirkhanian S. Recent applications of waste solid materials in pavement engineering. Waste Manag [Internet]. 2020;108:78–105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.024
4. Dong Q, Huang B. Laboratory Evaluation on Resilient Modulus and Rate Dependencies of RAP Used as Unbound Base Material. J Mater Civ Eng. 2014;26(2):379–83.
5. Audrey Copeland. Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures: State of the Practice. Rep No FHWA-HRT-11-021. 2011;(FHWA):McLean, Virginia.
6. Zaumanis M, Mallick RB. Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: State of the art. Int J Pavement Eng [Internet]. 2015;16(1):39–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.893331
7. Lo Presti D, Jiménez Del Barco Carrión A, Airey G, Hajj E. Towards 100% recycling of reclaimed asphalt in road surface courses: Binder design methodology and case studies. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2016;131:43–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.093
8. Porot L, Di Nolfo M, Polastro E, Tulcinsky S. Life cycle evaluation for reusing Reclaimed Asphalt with a bio-rejuvenating agent. In: Porot, Laurent, et al “Life cycle evaluation for reusing Reclaimed Asphalt with a bio-rejuvenating agent” Proceedings of the 6th Eurasphalt Eurobitume Congress. Prague, Czech Republic; 2017. p. 1–8.
9. D’Angelo J, Harm E, Bartoszek J, Baumgardner G, Corrigan M, Cowsert J, et al. Warm-Mix asphalt : European Practice. Fed Highw Adm. 2008;68.
10. Vaitkus A, Vorobjovas V, Žalimienė L, Žiliūt L. The research on the use of warm mix asphalt for asphalt Pavement structures Road traffic noise mitigation under development of noiseless pavements View project Modular pavements View project THE RESEARCH ON THE USE OF WARM MIX ASPHALT FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. In: Proceedings of the XXVII International Baltic Road Conference [Internet]. Riga, Latvia; 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237582194
11. McDaniel RS, Soleymani H, Anderson RM, Turner P, Peterson R. Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method. NCHRP Proj D9-12 Contract Final Rep. 2000;30(October):1–280.
12. Gulotta TM, Mistretta M, Praticò FG. A life cycle scenario analysis of different pavement technologies for urban roads. Sci Total Environ. 2019;673:585–93.
13. Santero NJ, Masanet E, Horvath A. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review. Resour Conserv Recycl [Internet]. 2011;55(9–10):801–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010
14. ISO. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines. Vol. 14044. ISO; 2006.
15. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Schryver A De, Struijs J, Zelm R Van. ReCiPe 2008. Potentials [Internet]. 2009;(January):1–44. Available from: http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/ReCiPe_main_report_final_27-02-2009_web.pdf
16. Pré. Product Ecology Consultants SimaPro 9 software. Amersfoort, The Netherlands; 2010.