Adlan (1), Budi Indra Setiawan (2), Chusnul Arif (3), Satyanto Krido Saptomo (4)
Estimation of evaporation rate is needed in hydrological data, especially in irrigation and drainage planning data. The method for estimating the evapotranspiration rate recommended by FAO is the Penman - Monteith method, however apart from this method there are still several methods that can be used if the data obtained in the field are different. Evaluation of the method of estimating the rate of evapotranspration is expected to help in choosing the right method when different data is obtained, so with this evaluation, we can see the accuracy of the methods. The methods that are closest to accuracy with the Penman - Monteith method are Hargreaves, Makkink, Turc, Blaney-Cridlle and Penman. If ordered based on the ranking of the evaluation results, the method that is closest to the Penman - Monteith method is Hargreaves, because of all the evaluation variabels Hargreaves has the best evaluation value. While the closest model based on the best R2 value is the Jensen-Haise model, but the error value of this model is very high.
Berengena, J dan P. Gavilan. 2005. Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation in a Highly Advective Semiarid Environment. Journal of Irrigation and darinage Engineering. 131(2):147 – 163
Blaney H.F., dan W. D. Criddle. 1962. Determining Consumptive Use and Irrigation Water Requirements. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
[BMKG] http://www.dataonline.bmkg.go.id (diakses 2020)
Cepece J.C, Catteneo D, Lim Y.S, Rodriguez E.E, Upham L, Campbel K.L.2002. Comparison of Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods.
Doorenbos J dan Pruitt W.O. 1977. Guideline for Predicting Crop Water Requirement. FAO. Rome.144 p
Fibriana, R, Ginting, Y.S, Ferdiansyah, E, Mubarak, S. 2018. Analisis Besar Atau Laju Evapotranspirasi pada Daerah Terbuka. Agrotekma, 2 (2): 130 - 137
Hargreaves, G. H. 1982. Estimation of potential evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 108: 223-230
Karo, V.B. Riska. 2020. Kajian Beberapa Metode Perhitungan Nilai Evapotranspirasi Potensial (Studi Kasus Desa Semangat Kecamatan Merdeka Kabupaten Karo). Program Studi Keteknikan Pertanian. Universitas Sumatra Utara.
Kharrufa, N. 1985. Simplified equation for evapotranspiration in arid regions. Beiträge Hydrol 5: 39–47
Manik, T K., R. B. Rosadi dan A. Karyanto. 2012. Evaluasi Metode Penman-Monteith dalam Menduga Laju Evapotranspirasi Standar (ET0) di Dataran Rendah Propinsi Lampung, Indonesia. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian. 26 (2): 121 – 128
Romanenko, V. A. 1961. Computation of the autumn soil moisture using a universal relationship for a large area. Proc. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Res. Inst. (Kiev) 3
Runtunuwu, E, Syahbuddin, H, dan Pramudia, A. 2008. Validasi Model Pendugaan Evapotranspirasi: Upaya Melengkapi Sistem Database Iklim Nasional. Jurnal Tanah Dan Iklim 27: 1-8
Suprayogi, S, Setiawan I.B., dan Prasetyo, L.B. 2003. Penerapan Beberapa Model Evapotranspirasi Di Daerah Tropika. Buletin Keteknikan Pertanian. 17 (2) : 7-13.
Saidah, H, Sulistyono, H, Budianto, M. B. 2020. Kalibrasi Persamaan Thornthwaite dan Evaporasi Panci Untuk Memprediksi Evapotranspirasi Potensial Pada Daerah Dengan Data Cuaca Terbatas. Jurnal Sains Teknologi &Lingkungan 6 (1): 72-84
Steduto, P., M. Todorovic, A. Caliandro, dan P. Rubino. 2003. Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Estimates by The Penman-Monteith Equation in Southern Italy. Constant Vs. Variabel Canopy Resistance. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 74: 217–225
Temesken, B., S. Eching, B. Davidoff dan K. Frame. 2005. Comparison of Some Reference Evapotranspiration Equations for California. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131 (1):73-84